Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Uzum и ВЭД по цене карго для Wildberries и Ozon | Маркетплейсы и товарный бизнес

Channel

Uzum и ВЭД по цене карго для Wildberries и Ozon | Маркетплейсы и товарный бизнес

@whiteimportved

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

19,529subscribers

-348 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001636236065
TypeChannel
Username@whiteimportved
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/whiteimportved

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

19,52919,87719,7037 August 2026 — 19,877 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,877 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,876 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,865 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,854 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,849 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,837 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,824 subscribers13 August 2026 — 19,816 subscribers15 August 2026 — 19,810 subscribers16 August 2026 — 19,786 subscribers17 August 2026 — 19,768 subscribers18 August 2026 — 19,755 subscribers19 August 2026 — 19,746 subscribers20 August 2026 — 19,737 subscribers22 August 2026 — 19,722 subscribers23 August 2026 — 19,715 subscribers25 August 2026 — 19,701 subscribers26 August 2026 — 19,692 subscribers27 August 2026 — 19,690 subscribers28 August 2026 — 19,674 subscribers29 August 2026 — 19,663 subscribers30 August 2026 — 19,661 subscribers31 August 2026 — 19,658 subscribers1 September 2026 — 19,650 subscribers1 September 2026 — 19,638 subscribers3 September 2026 — 19,622 subscribers4 September 2026 — 19,615 subscribers7 September 2026 — 19,582 subscribers10 September 2026 — 19,550 subscribers12 September 2026 — 19,540 subscribers14 September 2026 — 19,538 subscribers16 September 2026 — 19,530 subscribers18 September 2026 — 19,529 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -348. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,477–19,929 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 14:1719,529-1
16 Sept 2026, 04:5919,530-8
14 Sept 2026, 09:2119,538-2
12 Sept 2026, 16:2019,540-10
10 Sept 2026, 13:1719,550-32
7 Sept 2026, 05:5819,582-33
4 Sept 2026, 12:3819,615-7
3 Sept 2026, 01:0519,622-16
1 Sept 2026, 23:2919,638-12
1 Sept 2026, 00:1319,650-8
31 Aug 2026, 02:5419,658-3
30 Aug 2026, 01:1819,661-2
29 Aug 2026, 04:1319,663-11
28 Aug 2026, 01:2519,674-16
27 Aug 2026, 01:3719,690-2
26 Aug 2026, 02:2619,692-9
25 Aug 2026, 03:1819,701-14
23 Aug 2026, 22:3519,715-7
22 Aug 2026, 05:3819,722-15
20 Aug 2026, 22:2419,737first reading

Engagement

78 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.14%
avg views ÷ 19,529 subscribers
Avg views / post
223
42 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
42
of 78 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 26 of 42 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held78 (27 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total9,352
Reactions total127
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 01:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

339 reactions across 61 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍17852.5%
12837.8%
🔥298.55%
🆒20.59%
🙏20.59%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 61 of the 78 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 339 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 78 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 14:07 UTC138 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Вам говорят, что при белом ввозе можно вернуть китайский НДС 13%. Это правда наполовину, и вторая половина важнее. Ребят, объясним механику, хотя нам самим было бы выгоднее этого не объяснять. Экспортный НДС в Китае возвращает кто-то один. Либо ваш поставщик, либо вы. Вдвоём вернуть одну и ту же сумму физически невозможно. Если поставщик его не возвращает — он закладывает эту сумму в вашу цену. Если возвращаете вы

2 Sept 2026, 07:06 UTC178 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

До 40% возвратов при оплате инвойса в Китай — из-за ошибки в назначении платежа. Не санкции, не банк, не «всё закрыли». Строка в платёжке. По оценкам рынка, 30-40% попыток перевести деньги в Китай через классические каналы упираются в задержки, дополнительные проверки или возврат средств: китайские банки усилили комплаенс и проверяют каждую операцию. При этом больше 70% инвойсов поставщики выставляют в юанях. Ребя

👍2🔥1

1 Sept 2026, 18:32 UTC216 views5 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

«Сравните белую поставку с карго» — так больше не получится. Ребят, карго в прежнем виде для селлеров закончилось. Оно не исчезло — оно переобулось. Те же схемы, те же люди, но теперь с документами. УПД, накладная, иногда декларация. Хоть что-то дают почти все: тех, кто возит совсем без бумаг, на рынке практически не осталось. Мы это называем пятьюдесятью оттенками нового карго, и оттенков за последние полгода ста

🔥5

1 Sept 2026, 12:07 UTC248 views10 reactionsread 3 September 2026
File

📁 Собрали инструкцию по GTIN и маркировке. Забирайте Мы разбирали это на эфире 27 августа, и вопросов оказалось столько, что мы решили оформить разбор отдельным документом. Пять страниц, всё по шагам 🗂 Начнём с того, из-за чего путаница. Маркировок три, и они разные. Не заменяют друг друга, а дополняют. 🏷 Таможенная маркировка — текст на упаковке по техрегламентам: наименование, артикул, поставщик, адрес, импортёр

5🔥3🙏2

1 Sept 2026, 07:32 UTC242 views9 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

9

31 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC274 views5 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

«Давайте в белую» — «Тогда плюс 30 процентов к стоимости». На разборе предприниматель рассказал, как у него умер переход. Образцы разработаны, к фабрикам обратились, услышали про плюс 30% — и всё остановилось. Ребят, история узнаваемая. И вот что в ней не досчитано. 30% вы видите. Это цифра, которую вам назвали вслух, и она пугает. А наценку посредника вы не видите. По нашим замерам по десяти торговым домам она с

👍5

30 Aug 2026, 08:32 UTC298 views5 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🗓Сколько занимает переход на белые закупки? Отвечаем честно: по-разному. И вот это «по-разному» стоит разложить, потому что от него зависит, успеете вы или нет. Ребят, мы посчитали по своим поставкам и поставкам участников. Получилось три сценария. 30 дней — это про 5% селлеров. Совпасть должно всё сразу: фабрика у вас уже есть и она экспортная, товар уже произведён, а вашей категории хватает отказного письма без

👍5

29 Aug 2026, 11:06 UTC436 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Хорошие новости! Мы сделали запись нашего последнего эфира для всех открытой📹 Смотреть можно по ссылке 👇 https://wb-school-gulnara.ru/rec_0827 📌 Программа эфира: 1️⃣ блок. Разбор последних новостей 📰 • Что Wildberries объявил 21 августа про GTIN — и почему у карго-закупщика этого номера просто неоткуда взять 🏷 • Почему площадку обойти можно, а «Честный знак» — нет 🔒 • Чего 1 октября не произойдёт. Всё разом не за

👍53

28 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTC303 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

📱 Сегодня утром ВБ поправил наши юридические данные. Сам.. Прилетело уведомление: «Обновили ваши юридические данные. Мы заметили, что они отличались от данных в реестрах ФНС». Открываем — и правда, наименование ИП переписано так, чтобы совпадало с реестром до буквы 🔗 В уведомлении прямым текстом: сведения об организации теперь подтягиваются из реестров ФНС автоматически. Само по себе — мелочь. Но она означает боль

28 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC269 views4 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🏷 ВБ уточнил правила по GTIN. Хорошая новость: переупаковывать ничего не придётся Вчера вышло разъяснение по товарам, которые подлежат обязательной маркировке. Разберём по пунктам, потому что первая версия новости напугала многих зря. Наносить GTIN на упаковку отдельно не нужно 📦 Если он уже содержится в коде маркировки — не требуется. Если на упаковке ваш собственный баркод — переклеивать его не надо. Достаточно

2👍2

28 Aug 2026, 13:08 UTC224 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Извините, что заставили ждать :))

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 78 posts we hold for @whiteimportved. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@whiteimportved edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
26 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Uzum и ВЭД по цене карго для Wildberries и Ozon | Маркетплейсы и товарный бизнес” (@whiteimportved), 19,529 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/whiteimportved.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.