Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for kupfernickelley

Channel

kupfernickelley

@whitenick3l

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

39subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003653740273
TypeChannel
Username@whitenick3l
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/whitenick3l

Growth

3840398 August 2026 — 39 subscribers9 August 2026 — 40 subscribers10 August 2026 — 40 subscribers16 August 2026 — 39 subscribers24 August 2026 — 38 subscribers9 September 2026 — 39 subscribers8 August 20269 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 32 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 38–40 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 16:1739+1
24 Aug 2026, 08:4538-1
16 Aug 2026, 17:3939-1
10 Aug 2026, 18:3240no change
9 Aug 2026, 07:5440+1
8 Aug 2026, 08:3039first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 20 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

190 reactions across 12 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4724.7%
🍓2613.7%
custom 52444908274843770932312.1%
🔥2111.1%
💘2010.5%
🥰178.95%
custom 524703451757046435594.74%
custom 531682993085875275184.21%
custom 533270986376611349452.63%
custom 535291596690688573152.63%
🌭42.11%
custom 535028274393254591521.05%
custom 535047701389327638421.05%
🕊10.526%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 190 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2026, 06:52 UTC42 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

энимал хоспитал это тюрьма я и непятке опчть #скетчи

💘63🍓3🥰3

22 Jul 2026, 16:51 UTC45 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @nepyatkaaPhoto

Нормальные арты скоро будут. Держите нарисованногг в магме фурри и свина из энгри бердс

🔥42🍓2💘2🥰2

22 Jul 2026, 16:49 UTC38 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

магма с наисветлейшей (😇) непятке #щп #скетчи (?)

5🍓2🔥2🥰2

22 Jul 2026, 16:45 UTC35 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

привет козлики в магме #щп #скетч

6🍓2🔥2

22 Jul 2026, 16:34 UTC33 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026

я сброшу бомбу в этот канал

🔥5🍓3🥰3

20 Jul 2026, 13:50 UTC42 views26 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

т*пые good omens 💀💀💀 усатый азирафаэль я отвыкла от графического планшета #скетч #щп

11🔥7🥰6🍓1💘1

4 Jul 2026, 03:15 UTC79 views20 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

я улетела

8🍓5custom 52444908274843770934💘2🕊1

3 Jul 2026, 16:23 UTC71 views18 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

привет , никель козел вообще готовятся коллабы, +смена названия канала ( Я все еще никель, но немного упрощу его) а пока шо я накидываю свою ос , референс будэ , обещаю… кстати коллабы открыты теперь 😎 #скетч

custom 52444908274843770936custom 53168299308587527514custom 53327098637661134944custom 53529159669068857312🍓1custom 53504770138932763841

22 Jun 2026, 15:26 UTC89 views20 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @nepyatkaaPhoto

Итак, все экзамены сданы, а значит я могу возвращаться к рисованию😌😌держите скетч джона

🌭4custom 52444908274843770934custom 53168299308587527514🍓3custom 535291596690688573121💘1custom 53327098637661134941

21 Jun 2026, 17:26 UTC78 views23 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

такое творчество принимается? 😒 (23 балла, лол, я щаслива. задачи обе засчитали )

8💘6custom 52444908274843770935custom 52470345175704643553custom 53504770138932763841

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @whitenick3l. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“kupfernickelley” (@whitenick3l), 39 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/whitenick3l.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.