Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 42 days, net -35. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,543–2,588 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 18:40
2,548
-5
13 Sept 2026, 12:36
2,553
-1
10 Sept 2026, 02:16
2,554
-6
4 Sept 2026, 21:39
2,560
-3
1 Sept 2026, 14:04
2,563
-7
29 Aug 2026, 08:34
2,570
+1
26 Aug 2026, 08:43
2,569
-2
23 Aug 2026, 10:23
2,571
-3
20 Aug 2026, 05:43
2,574
-6
16 Aug 2026, 20:52
2,580
-2
13 Aug 2026, 06:18
2,582
+3
10 Aug 2026, 05:53
2,579
-2
6 Aug 2026, 23:20
2,581
-2
6 Aug 2026, 11:07
2,583
no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:59
2,583
first reading
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 14 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
27m 47s
Average length
6m 57s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
607 reactions across 12 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
160
26.4%
😁
101
16.6%
🤮
87
14.3%
👏
75
12.4%
💩
28
4.61%
😎
25
4.12%
💯
24
3.95%
👍
20
3.29%
🤡
14
2.31%
🤬
14
2.31%
🗿
9
1.48%
👎
7
1.15%
💅
7
1.15%
👀
6
0.988%
🤯
5
0.824%
❤
4
0.659%
🌚
4
0.659%
🥴
4
0.659%
🤨
3
0.494%
❤🔥
2
0.329%
5 further kinds
8
1.32%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 607 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 14 September 2024 to 28 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The West Deserves to be Flooded by Immigrants
by Balkan Odyssey
A video that argues that everything happening in the west is the natural consequence of what the West caused in the first place. There is nothing about the state of Western countries that can be blamed on anyone else other than the West herself.
As Oswald Spengler prophecied, The final destination of the West is inevitable.
——————
SEE ALSO
——————
Wha…
💩🇨🇳
Poop exploded everywhere landing on the road, cars, people, and pets the moment a sewage pipe pressure test in Nanning failed. This scene of horror shows feces falling from the sky after the initial explosion in China.
Race Maxing vs Race Mixing
Part 2 of 2
Race Mixing is a dysgenic process by which couples from different races come together to create self-destructive marriage partnerships. Statistics indicate that any combination with black men or white women yield typically unsuccessful relationships and are therefore dysgenic.
The most dysgenic combinations are:
5.) East Asian man + White woman
4.) Indian man + White woman
3.…
Race Maxing vs Race Mixing
Part 1 of 2
Race Maxing is a eugenic process by which couples from different races come together to create successful marriage partnerships. Statistics indicate that any combination of non-white women and non-black men yield typically successful relationships and are therefore eugenic.
The most eugenic combinations are:
5.) East Asian man + Indian woman
4.) Indian man + East Asian woman
…
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @whitesarebazed. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Chat GPT @ChatGPT_by_OpenAI · 36,525 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 1 September 2026
UPPCS POLICE CONSTABLE UPSSSC PET @up_police_constable_upsssc_pet_Q · 43,627 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Western Moment” (@whitesarebazed), 2,548 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/whitesarebazed.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
