Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝒲h𝙞tℰ!¡ s¡m𝙪la𝑐ruᵐ//愛// 'White Simulacrum

Channel

𝒲h𝙞tℰ!¡ s¡m𝙪la𝑐ruᵐ//愛// 'White Simulacrum

@whitesimulacrum

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

160subscribers

+151 since we began measuring on 13 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004275250926
TypeChannel
Username@whitesimulacrum
CreatedBetween 1 May 2026 and 11 September 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 October 2026
Last confirmed live30 October 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/whitesimulacrum

Topic

Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

916285.513 September 2026 — 9 subscribers14 September 2026 — 67 subscribers28 September 2026 — 143 subscribers8 October 2026 — 157 subscribers14 October 2026 — 157 subscribers23 October 2026 — 162 subscribers30 October 2026 — 160 subscribers16013 September 202630 October 2026
7 measurements spanning 47 days, net +151. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Oct 2026, 11:45160-2
23 Oct 2026, 12:08162+5
14 Oct 2026, 13:22157no change
8 Oct 2026, 01:37157+14
28 Sept 2026, 07:22143+76
14 Sept 2026, 13:2167+58
13 Sept 2026, 11:479first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
38.8%
avg views ÷ 160 subscribers
Avg views / post
62.0
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 October 2026
Posts held20 (11 September 2026 – 12 October 2026)
Views total248
Reactions total6
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Oct 2026, 13:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

164 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52061829962641179853722.6%
custom 53146332397704495983722.6%
custom 52064309017764436973420.7%
custom 59897916103915001183420.7%
custom 519757231698007987984.88%
custom 519955920750591854953.05%
custom 521112915791159618531.83%
custom 543818824760168536231.83%
custom 544764381137735298031.83%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 164 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 September 2026 to 12 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Oct 2026, 18:00 UTC46 views3 reactionsread 14 October 2026

✨𝑁𝑒𝑤ᵖ ᵒ ˢ ᵗ–❗️ 🪉🪉🪉🪉 🪉🪉🪉🪉 🔤ⲧυⲕⲉⲣⲡⲁⲕ ⲡⲟ.. 🔤𝑢𝓏и🎀 🪉🪉🪉🪉🪉🪉🪉🪉🪉 🪉🪉🪉🪉🪉🪉🪉🪉🪉 (//клик//) 音楽🤩@whitesimulacrumbot #pσs𝑡

custom 51975723169800798791custom 52111291579115961851custom 54381882476016853621

5 Oct 2026, 20:31 UTC80 views3 reactionsread 14 October 2026

✨𝑁𝑒𝑤ᵖ ᵒ ˢ ᵗ–❗️ 🪉🪉🪉🪉 🪉🪉🪉🪉 🔤ⲧυⲕⲉⲣⲡⲁⲕ ⲡⲟ.. 🤩ƴ𝑎🤩🤩 🪉🪉🪉🪉🪉🪉🪉🪉🪉 🪉🪉🪉🪉🪉🪉🪉🪉🪉 (//клик//) 音楽🤩@whitesimulacrumbot #pσs𝑡

custom 51995592075059185491custom 54381882476016853621custom 54476438113773529801

1 Oct 2026, 13:31 UTC108 views8 reactionsread 14 October 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 51975723169800798794custom 51995592075059185492custom 52111291579115961851custom 54476438113773529801

26 Sept 2026, 12:20 UTC143 views8 reactionsread 14 October 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 51975723169800798793custom 51995592075059185492custom 52111291579115961851custom 54381882476016853621custom 54476438113773529801

22 Sept 2026, 16:21 UTC144 views7 reactionsread 14 October 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 59897916103915001183custom 52064309017764436972custom 52061829962641179851custom 53146332397704495981

21 Sept 2026, 15:40 UTC160 views7 reactionsread 14 October 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 52061829962641179853custom 59897916103915001182custom 52064309017764436971custom 53146332397704495981

19 Sept 2026, 14:20 UTC178 views6 reactionsread 14 October 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 52061829962641179852custom 53146332397704495982custom 52064309017764436971custom 59897916103915001181

18 Sept 2026, 15:20 UTC187 views10 reactionsread 14 October 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 53146332397704495984custom 59897916103915001183custom 52061829962641179852custom 52064309017764436971

17 Sept 2026, 16:27 UTC211 views10 reactionsread 14 October 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 52061829962641179855custom 53146332397704495982custom 59897916103915001182custom 52064309017764436971

17 Sept 2026, 12:10 UTC215 views8 reactionsread 14 October 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 59897916103915001183custom 52061829962641179852custom 52064309017764436972custom 53146332397704495981

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @whitesimulacrum. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝒲h𝙞tℰ!¡ s¡m𝙪la𝑐ruᵐ//愛// 'White Simulacrum” (@whitesimulacrum), 160 subscribers as measured 30 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/whitesimulacrum.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.