Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for HžZ, v7ÇH. 🚫 #resttť

Channel

HžZ, v7ÇH. 🚫 #resttť

@wich0222

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

59subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003897498918
TypeChannel
Username@wich0222
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/wich0222

Growth

526156.58 August 2026 — 52 subscribers10 August 2026 — 52 subscribers17 August 2026 — 61 subscribers24 August 2026 — 59 subscribers598 August 202624 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 16 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 51–62 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 13:5859-2
17 Aug 2026, 10:5361+9
10 Aug 2026, 10:1652no change
8 Aug 2026, 21:3152first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
17s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

93 reactions across 7 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥2628.0%
custom 52336481395959768451212.9%
1111.8%
🤬1010.8%
custom 544982560751908285177.53%
custom 545868693250457963666.45%
💩66.45%
custom 522430145324125763244.30%
custom 522449951136314608333.23%
custom 545871606097278286833.23%
🤮33.23%
custom 545850254526359399322.15%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 93 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 March 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @wich0222. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 March 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 21:58 UTC50 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🐈🦷🦷😘🔆🌟🌟🔤 🔠 🅰️👍🙂🅰️🌑☺️🅰️🎀🟥🩸. 🏎 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ #зарисовка ; #многосерийка ; 🥩 #лидинты ; #2часть 🤩🤩🤩🤩 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 🌟 tw: паническая атака. #Интригававтоспорте (2ч) 🌟🌟 🌟🌟 тык тык тык 🌟🌟 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ От реальных людей взыты только имена и внешность. Всё написанное - художественный вымысел.

❤‍🔥4🤬32

28 Jul 2026, 19:57 UTC108 viewsread 10 August 2026

Если бы не я, он бы даже не родился

28 Jul 2026, 19:57 UTC298 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Фанаты импульса срочно должны мне отсосать

20 Jun 2026, 21:00 UTC108 viewsread 10 August 2026

Скажи пожалусто как ты относишься к 67

26 Apr 2026, 14:13 UTC220 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Не хочу никого кормить завтраками и обещаниями, потому: в ближайшее время не буду ничего писать и делать в пользу канала впринципе. Перегорела к зарисовкам и тгк. Мб, ближе к лету чёт дропну, но не факт. Можете особо ничего не ждать, ибо "контента" не будет. Ну или да, но только в больших промежутках по времени. ;))))

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @wich0222. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“HžZ, v7ÇH. 🚫 #resttť” (@wich0222), 59 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wich0222.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.