Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for WikiTarjima

Channel

WikiTarjima

@wikitarjima

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,094subscribers

-43 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001960623347
TypeChannel
Username@wikitarjima
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/wikitarjima

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,0941,1371,115.57 August 2026 — 1,137 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,137 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,133 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,130 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,126 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,120 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,119 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,113 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,111 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,108 subscribers8 September 2026 — 1,100 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,096 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,094 subscribers7 August 202615 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 39 days, net -43. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,088–1,143 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 13:171,094-2
12 Sept 2026, 07:571,096-4
8 Sept 2026, 05:361,100-8
2 Sept 2026, 16:141,108-3
30 Aug 2026, 18:381,111-2
27 Aug 2026, 12:341,113-6
24 Aug 2026, 10:151,119-1
20 Aug 2026, 22:431,120-6
17 Aug 2026, 16:461,126-4
14 Aug 2026, 17:261,130-3
11 Aug 2026, 01:531,133-4
7 Aug 2026, 23:481,137no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:151,137first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

174 reactions across 19 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
⚡4224.1%
❤3922.4%
🔥2614.9%
👍2112.1%
😁2112.1%
🏆74.02%
🐳63.45%
🆒42.30%
👎21.15%
🕊21.15%
🤩21.15%
👌10.575%
🥴10.575%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 174 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 December 2025 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Jun 2026, 03:50 UTC856 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

U terma jamoa safidagi soʻnggi oʻyinini 37 yoshida Islandiyaga qarshi oʻtqazdi va oʻyinning 14- daqiqasida almashtirildi. Bir necha yil Winchester shaxrida istiqomat qilgan ushbu futbolchi kim? wikiTarjima – Original tarjimalar

⚡1

19 May 2026, 07:18 UTC992 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🕷️🎸 Olimlar Janubiy Amerikada yangi o‘rgimchak turini kashf etdi — Pikelinia floydmuraria. U mashhur Pink Floyd sharafiga nomlangan. Nomining ma’nosi ham qiziq: “floyd” — Pink Floyd guruhiga ishora qilsa, “muraria” lotinchada “devorga oid” degani. Bu nom guruhning mashhur The Wall albomiga ham nozik ishora hisoblanadi. 🧱🎶 Bu o‘rgimchak devor yoriqlari va uy atroflarida yashaydi hamda o‘zidan 6 baravar katta chumoli…

⚡2👍1🔥1🕊1🆒1

15 May 2026, 04:52 UTC≈1,500 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

“Beijing bikini” — Xitoydagi yozgi odat Xitoyda yozning jazirama kunlarida erkaklarning futbolkasini qornigacha ko‘tarib yurishi odati bor. Bu holat xalq orasida “Beijing bikini” deb ataladi. Ayniqsa parklar, ko‘cha oshxonalari va mototsiklda yurgan erkaklar orasida ko‘p uchraydi. An’anaviy xitoy tabobatiga ko‘ra, qorinni ochib yurish tanadagi “qi” energiyasi aylanishiga yordam beradi va issiqni yengillashtiradi. S…

😁5❤3🤩2🆒2⚡1👎1🥴1

12 Apr 2026, 07:53 UTC858 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @inteligenti_paucaPhoto

Tiffani effekti — bu odamlar tarixiy jihatdan to‘g‘ri bo‘lgan narsa yoki ismni faqat zamonaviy tuyulgani uchun noto‘g‘ri deb o‘ylash hodisasi. “Tiffany” ismi ko‘pchilikka hozirgi zamonga xosdek tuyuladi, lekin aslida u O‘rta asrlarda ham ishlatilgan. Shunga qaramay, tarixiy filmda bu ismni eshitsak, ko‘pchilik uni xato deb o‘ylaydi. Yoki Vikinglar haqidagi filmlarda ko'rsatiladigan 2 shoxli dubulg'alar, aslida Viki…

❤6⚡4🔥2🐳1

20 Feb 2026, 11:47 UTC≈1,200 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @inteligenti_pauca

​​▪️Qiziq tarixga ega olmos bilan tanishamiz Hope Diamond(Umid olmosi) — dunyodagi eng mashhur ko‘k olmos. Uning og‘irligi 45,52 karat. Rangining to‘q ko‘k bo‘lishiga sabab tarkibidagi bor elementi. Olmos Hindistonning Golkonda konlaridan XVII asrda qazib olingan. 1660-yillarda fransuz savdogari Jean-Baptiste Tavernier Hindistondan katta ko‘k olmosni Yevropaga olib kelgan. 1668-yilda Fransiya qiroli Louis XIV uni s…

❤7⚡4👍2

6 Feb 2026, 04:52 UTC≈1,320 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Bluff — bu poker o'yinida o‘zingizda kuchli karta bo‘lmasa ham, raqiblarni kuchli qo‘l bor deb ishontirib, ularni kartani tashlashga majbur qilish usuli. Bluff asosan raqiblar kam bo‘lganda, ehtiyotkor o‘yinchilarga qarshi va pozitsiyada bo‘lganda samarali ishlaydi. Uning pure bluff (umuman yutish imkoniyatisiz) va semi-bluff (keyingi karta bilan kuchayishi mumkin) kabi turlari bor. Bluffni har doim qilish to‘g‘ri e…

❤3👍3🔥3⚡1🐳1

25 Jan 2026, 15:45 UTC≈1,030 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @inteligenti_paucaFile

25,01.2026 Fazg'ona Zakovat Klubida o'tkazilgan Marafon uchun Intelhaf jamoasi paketi, Intelligenti Pauca

👍5❤4⚡1🐳1

25 Jan 2026, 13:53 UTC≈1,090 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

✨ Asr muhabbati — Bella va Mark ✨ Mark Shagal va Bella Rozenfeld o‘rtasidagi munosabatlar nafaqat eng mashhur sevgi hikoyalaridan biri, balki sermahsul ijodiy hamkorlik ham edi. Bella Shagal hayotida rafiqa, bosh ilhom manbai, muharrir va barcha ishlarida mustahkam tayanch bo‘lgan. Bella o‘zining «Yonayotgan chiroqlar» kitobida Shagal uning portretlaridan birini chizayotgan onlarni eslab, unga shunday murojaat qila…

🔥5⚡1❤1

21 Jan 2026, 06:58 UTC≈1,040 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

OK qayerdan chiqqan? 🤔 Bugun butun dunyo ishlatadigan OK aslida oddiy qisqartma emas, balki tarixdagi eng muvaffaqiyatli “mem”lardan biri. Eng mashhur versiyaga ko‘ra, OK 1839-yilda AQShda paydo bo‘lgan. O‘sha paytda jurnalistlar all correct (“hammasi to‘g‘ri”) iborasini hazil tariqasida oll korrect deb yozishgan. Shu yozuvdan OK qolib ketgan. 1840-yilda AQSh prezidenti Martin Van Byuren bu so‘zning ommalashishiga…

⚡9🏆2👌1🆒1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @wikitarjima. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Zakovat intellektual klubi
@zakovat · 29,087
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 9 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“WikiTarjima” (@wikitarjima), 1,094 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wikitarjima.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.