11 measurements spanning 30 days, net +19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,356–9,402 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Sept 2026, 17:20
9,384
-13
2 Sept 2026, 11:04
9,397
+1
30 Aug 2026, 15:24
9,396
+27
27 Aug 2026, 16:02
9,369
-4
24 Aug 2026, 22:13
9,373
+3
21 Aug 2026, 08:53
9,370
-3
18 Aug 2026, 00:42
9,373
-7
15 Aug 2026, 06:22
9,380
+19
11 Aug 2026, 23:02
9,361
-3
8 Aug 2026, 13:13
9,364
-1
7 Aug 2026, 13:31
9,365
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
25.9%
avg views ÷ 9,384 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,430
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.98%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 10 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held
10 (1 August 2026 – 27 August 2026)
Views total
14,570
Reactions total
640
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Aug 2026, 06:45 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
40s
Average length
40s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,750 reactions across 9 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
764
43.7%
🔥
399
22.8%
custom 5426908658460021651
346
19.8%
⚡
65
3.71%
👏
62
3.54%
👍
46
2.63%
🥰
34
1.94%
🤣
15
0.857%
😍
11
0.629%
custom 5321400416011847079
5
0.286%
👎
3
0.171%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,750 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 10 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @wildisssimo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 27 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
ЧТО ЧИТАЕМ В СЕНТЯБРЕ?!
Дэниел Мейсон «Северный лес».
Во-первых, нужно быть готовым к неспешному, анти-СДВГэшному повествованию идеальному для сентября.
Во-вторых, а что если героем роман будет не человек, а место, которое 300 лет наблюдает за переменами вокруг?!
В-третьих, раз уж наш любимый Вергезе приклеился к креслу, тоже так хотим:)
Обсуждаем онлайн 24 сентября.
Расписание живых встреч в Новосибирске:
20 се…
«СБОРЩИКИ ЯГОД» АМАНДА ПИТЕРС
Зафиналим книжное лето обсуждением дебютного романа канадской писательницы:)
Жду ваши рецензии в комментариях под этим постом.
Мой отзыв по традиции в первом.
Сегодня вечером объявлю книгу сентября:)
Что уже читали в клубе здесь:
#wildissimo_книги
Однажды читательница меня спросила, можно ли использовать бьюти-гаджет от WAU со своей привычной косметикой?
Можно, я так делаю уже три месяца:)
И сиюминутно команда WAU предложила протестировать именно их косметическую линейку. А кто я такая, чтобы отказываться от новых интересных продуктов?
Спойлер: нам это надо, девочки✨
Пошагово пройдемся по бьюти-алгоритму, который и составляет качественный домашний уход:
…
📕ЖИВАЯ ВСТРЕЧА КНИЖНОГО КЛУБА 📕
Обсуждаем «Сборщики ягод» Аманды Питерс.
Когда: 23 августа, воскресенье, 14:00
Локация: Феттучитто, Урицкого 4 (Новосибирск)
Стоимость билета: 2000 ₽
Угощаем бокалом игристого, спэшл закуской Conchiglioni ripieni al forno (как звучит!) и тирамису.
ДРУГ КЛУБА В АВГУСТЕ-
центр здоровья и красоты OSNOVA
Сайт: https://osnova.expert
Подарок для каждого участника встречи – гостевое з…
ПОКУПКИ НА МАРКЕТПЛЕЙСАХ
Версия: ЕДА🍤🥟🫒
Пришло время пополнить буфеты и маршрутную карту к сердцам:)
1. Фруктовые горчицы к сыру - самая идеально закуска к вину. Раньше брали на маркете, сейчас пробуем тут: https://ozon.ru/t/sXaU3tu
Еще есть овощные закуски - https://ozon.ru/t/zLeMScz
2. Нет ничего вкуснее домашнего песто, но если что готовый здесь: https://ozon.ru/t/CrhrRtB
3. Очень вкусный бальзамический соус…
Слова и фразы, которые бесят
готовлюсь к новому семестру в универе, обновляю лекцию по речевым штампам! помогайте:)
Здесь не будет фундамента, на котором держатся создатели магния:
«от слова совсем», «крайний» вместо «последний», «имеет место быть».
Пройдемся по миру интернета и, в частности, блогинга)
1 место
Штампы в комментариях
Обожаю остроумие даже больше, чем деньги. Но может скажем им, что хорошо это был…
КОЛЛАГЕНОВЫЕ НОВОСТИ🔥
Знаю, что многие ждали бесплатную доставку и возможность заказывать коллаген через маркетплейсы.
Уже 5 (!) лет я сотрудничаю с ребятами, и наконец это свершилось.
ПЕРВЫЙ ЖИВОЙ КОЛЛАГЕН НА OZON
(прям кликайте на эту ссылку, чтобы промик сработал)
Приятная скидка по промокоду:
WILDISSIMO
Банка экономичнее, но я сильно полюбила формат стиков: во-первых, дневная дозировка уже отмерена, во-вторы…
ЧТО ЧИТАЮТ В КНИЖНОМ КЛУБЕ ОПРЫ УИНФРИ
новая рубрика: буду знакомить вас с книжными клубами звёзд и делиться теми находками, которые могут отозваться и нам.
Знакомьтесь, Oprah’s Book Club превратил чтение в массовое культурное событие. Пример самого долгоиграющего клуба, который существует 30 лет!
Интересные факты:
-клуб возник в 1996 году, все как у нас: участники читают одно произведение в месяц,
-единственны…
ДАЙДЖЕСТ ИЮЛЯ
мой июль, как будто такой: братья-месяцы, я все беру на себя!
-ровно 1 числа я не смогла заправиться. В эпоху ковида пожили, пробуем топливный кризис,
-докрутили проект кухни-гостиной- это 100% попадание! У меня будет буфет для супницы и леопардовые стулья😭
-ходила болеть за подругу на интеллектуальное шоу «Что? Где? Когда?» Если перестанете записываться на мои курсы, устроюсь чуваком, который бьет …
❤204🥰33⚡15👏11🔥8👍2custom 54269086584600216512
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @wildisssimo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@wildisssimo edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
18 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 27 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Александр Бессонов @AleksBessonov · 59,562 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 22 August 2026
FitКатики @FitKatiki · 55,051 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 23 August 2026
Kvadromama @marinka_kvadromama · 45,149 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“WILDISSIMO печатает…” (@wildisssimo), 9,384 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wildisssimo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.