Ich hab's getan. So lange habe ich es vor mir hergeschoben. UND seit 2 Minuten habe ich es echt gemacht.

Channel
Network Marketing ohne Namensliste 💪 Willi Prokop - MLM Erfahrungen
@willi_prokop
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,930subscribers
-367 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001492171066 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @willi_prokop |
| Description | 1. Wichtige FB Updates für MLM 2. +200 hilfreiche (gratis) Audio Trainings 3. unveröffentlichte Tipps und Tricks Network Marketing ohne Akquise Erfahrungen von Willi Prokop. https://www.williprokop.at |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/willi_prokop |
Topic
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 15:14 | 7,930 | -13 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 12:27 | 7,943 | -11 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 10:06 | 7,954 | -16 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 23:46 | 7,970 | -6 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 03:09 | 7,976 | -15 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 12:06 | 7,991 | -15 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 15:56 | 8,006 | -11 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 17:59 | 8,017 | -10 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 02:18 | 8,027 | -22 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 16:14 | 8,049 | -56 |
| 24 Sept 2026, 23:01 | 8,105 | -24 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 23:01 | 8,129 | -18 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 14:40 | 8,147 | -15 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 12:16 | 8,162 | -12 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 12:01 | 8,174 | -16 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 8,190 | -17 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:39 | 8,207 | -9 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 11:26 | 8,216 | -17 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 10:18 | 8,233 | -16 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 07:52 | 8,249 | first reading |
Engagement
53 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 12.3%
- avg views ÷ 7,930 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 975
- 22 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 22
- of 53 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 53 (23 June 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 21,460 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 23:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 18
- Videos
- 2
- Links
- 527
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 22 posts held from the last 30 days (27.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
👉 Hier direkt zur Aufzeichnung: https://www.facebook.com/groups/momentummacher/ Thema gestern Abend im Live: Massive Weihnachts-Umsätze mit 3 unbekannten FB-Strategien. Wenn Angela Weihnachtsplätzchen backt, gibt es keinen Streit. ;-) Auf Facebook streiten sich viele um Reichweite. Und gehen leer aus. Warum? Metas OCR-Scanner scannt jedes Etikett auf deinen Fotos. Und würgt die Sichtbarkeit ab. In der Aufzeichnun…
Heute 19.00 Uhr gehe ich LIVE Ich wollte heute eigentlich schon die ersten Weihnachtskekse testen. Rein zur Qualitätskontrolle natürlich. ;-) Haha. ABER vorher machen wir noch dein Weihnachtsgeschäft startklar. Um Punkt 19.00 Uhr zeige ich dir 3 unbekannte Facebook-Strategien für den November und Dezember. Die meisten im Network machen sich jetzt wieder verrückt. Schreiben alte Bekannte an. Oder pflastern ihr Pro…
Guten Morgääähnn. Etwas verschlafen sitze ich heute da. ;-) Ich habe immer früh gearbeitet. Denn man "muss ja diszipliniert" sein. ABER … warum habe ich es 16 Jahre nicht geschafft? Obwohl ich so fleißig war. Ich habe mit vielen Leuten gesprochen. Meine ganze Spamliste Namensliste abgearbeitet. Mein höchster Scheck: 200 Euronen Und das war eine Warenrückvergütung eigentlich. Das größte Problem war das hier: Me…
Bis heute, Sonntag, 23.59 Uhr nur mehr: Warum vertreiben die meisten Beitrittsfragen Interessenten sofort? Weil sie falsch gestellt sind. Ich habe das aus 169 Gruppen-Analysen ganz genau herausgearbeitet. Und heute mache ich das zum ersten Mal öffentlich. Es geht um Willis 4-Fragen-Formel für deine Facebook-Gruppe. Kein langes Video, wo du mitschreiben musst. Sondern eine glasklare Anleitung als Text zum direkten Rau…
Kennst du das schon? Wird dir 100% im Network helfen. Rock it!° Dein Willi PS: Morgen endet die Aktion auf www.speedinar.net
Der größte Fehler im Network Marketing Ich habe gestern zum ersten Mal darüber gesprochen hier. Rock it! Dein Willi PS: Bis Sonntag bekommst du meine Frage-Formel im Speedinar.
Ich habe 169 Networker FB-Gruppen analysiert. UND das ist der größte Fehler. Er kostet dir enorme Umsätze. Was das ist? Zeige ich dir heute in einem FB-LIVE Video. Um 19 Uhr. Wie kannst du dabei sein? Sei pünktlich hier in meiner FB-Gruppe drin. Oder gehe hier in mein FB-Event rein. Rock it! Dein Willi
169 Gruppen analysiert Und das ist der #1 Fehler. Rock it! Dein Willi
Du lässt so viel Potenzial liegen. Ja, echt. Warum? Du hast stille Beobachter in deinen FB Stories. Sie lesen mit. ABER sie kaufen nicht. Noch nicht. Wenn du es jedoch richtig machen würdest, ändert sich alles. Das habe ich schon so oft gesehen. Ich habe für dich einen Walkthrough gefilmt. Den kannst du dir hier bis heute Mitternacht holen. Wenn du bis dahin im Speedinar bist. Danach geht es nicht mehr. Es i…
Hör mal: Das kennst du noch nicht. Rock it! Dein Willi PS: Am Sonntag ist es vorbei.
"Willi, warum bekommen meine Network Marketing Postings keine Sichtbarkeit mehr?" Ganz klar. Weil du GEGEN die neue Stoppuhr von Facebook arbeitest. ABER was meinst du damit? Das erkläre ich dir hier in meinem Video. Rock it! Dein Willi PS: Bis So 25.10. kannst du stille Beobachter in Erstlinien verwandeln.
Showing the 12 most recent of 53 posts we hold for @willi_prokop. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Loewentatze · 33,605
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Network Marketing ohne Namensliste 💪 Willi Prokop - MLM Erfahrungen” (@willi_prokop), 7,930 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/willi_prokop.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.