Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for WINNING ZONE

Channel

WINNING ZONE

@winningzoneofficl

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,113subscribers

-34 since we began measuring on 21 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001529487912
TypeChannel
Username@winningzoneofficl
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded21 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/winningzoneofficl

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,1131,1471,13021 August 2026 — 1,147 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,147 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,146 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,143 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,140 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,135 subscribers7 September 2026 — 1,126 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,120 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,118 subscribers19 September 2026 — 1,113 subscribers21 August 202619 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 29 days, net -34. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,108–1,152 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 08:381,113-5
15 Sept 2026, 06:581,118-2
11 Sept 2026, 15:361,120-6
7 Sept 2026, 10:551,126-9
2 Sept 2026, 13:051,135-5
30 Aug 2026, 19:541,140-3
28 Aug 2026, 06:281,143-3
25 Aug 2026, 03:541,146-1
21 Aug 2026, 12:301,147no change
21 Aug 2026, 12:151,147first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 14 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

4 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
250.0%
👍250.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 14 September 2025 to 5 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Apr 2026, 10:03 UTC619 viewsread 21 August 2026

Virat Kohli Ready for CSK Battle 👑 RCB vs CSK Preview | IPL 2026 https://youtu.be/6vuyxoBbUOg https://youtu.be/6vuyxoBbUOg

29 Mar 2026, 07:39 UTC715 views1 reactionsread 21 August 2026

MI vs KKR IPL 2026 Match Preview | Who Will WIN at Wankhede? https://youtu.be/taCSn0WukTk https://youtu.be/taCSn0WukTk https://youtu.be/taCSn0WukTk

1

28 Mar 2026, 02:22 UTC735 viewsread 21 August 2026

RCB vs SRH 1st Match IPL 2026 – Match Preview | https://youtu.be/mvQHE9KNOgE https://youtu.be/mvQHE9KNOgE https://youtu.be/mvQHE9KNOgE

27 Mar 2026, 14:21 UTC737 views2 reactionsread 21 August 2026

HELLO EVERYONE ♥️ RCB VS SRH VIDEO COMING TODAY AT 9 PM GET READY WITH NEW CONTENT 😌

👍2

12 Mar 2026, 13:47 UTC773 viewsread 21 August 2026

Hello everyone Hope you guys well. I recently made this video after a long time ! Hope you guys love it ♥️ Youtube- https://youtu.be/80NpAFGnqGU

15 Nov 2025, 09:51 UTC≈1,040 viewsread 21 August 2026

IPL CSK-RR TRADE | Samson to CSK - Jadeja to Rajasthan Trade Swap Reality | IPL Biggest Swap https://youtu.be/0mGlm4tAqAk

15 Oct 2025, 17:12 UTC≈1,130 viewsread 21 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/live/eJZilvROC_0?si=XeJdP0EFJPcLXk_7

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @winningzoneofficl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Oct 2025, 03:02 UTCAnonymous Poll12 voters

Hello Guys 🙌🏻 Kya lagta hai game aayega wapas 🤐

  1. Pakka Aayega75%
  2. Ab nahi lagta Aayega25%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 14 September 2025 to 5 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

CricXPrediction
@dreamperfect_11 · 25,895
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 13 September 2026
Army Dost🇮🇳
@Armydost · 34,009
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 3 September 2026
Sarkari Tricks
@sarkaritrick · 79,637
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 5 September 2026
GRAND LEAGUE EXPERT"NO PRIME" 🏏
@grandleagueexpertranu · 62,867
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 21 August 2026
Perfect Win
@Perfectwinofficial · 45,363
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“WINNING ZONE” (@winningzoneofficl), 1,113 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/winningzoneofficl.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.