Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Wir Wollen Reden:

Channel

Wir Wollen Reden:

@wir_wollen_reden

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

388subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001791519563
TypeChannel
Username@wir_wollen_reden
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/wir_wollen_reden

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 42% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3883963927 August 2026 — 394 subscribers8 August 2026 — 394 subscribers8 August 2026 — 395 subscribers15 August 2026 — 396 subscribers5 September 2026 — 390 subscribers14 September 2026 — 388 subscribers7 August 202614 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 38 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 387–397 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 00:40388-2
5 Sept 2026, 22:38390-6
15 Aug 2026, 07:05396+1
8 Aug 2026, 09:31395+1
8 Aug 2026, 05:51394no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:32394first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 43s
Average length
1m 43s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

18 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
844.4%
👍211.1%
👏211.1%
🔥211.1%
🕊211.1%
💯15.56%
🤣15.56%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 23:00 UTC21 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @IndikativJetztPhoto

Russenschleier, klarer Fall. Der Russe muss die Kamera verschleiert haben. Was soll es sonst sein? https://x.com/KratiKratos/status/2085615913831723389

7 Aug 2026, 22:09 UTC27 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @kodoroc

https://kodoroc.de/2026/08/07/dachte-katastrophenjahr/

7 Aug 2026, 12:39 UTC64 viewsread 8 August 2026

1975, 2021, heute: Das Muster hinter der Ceuta-Krise – Küppersbusch TV https://youtube.com/watch?v=ISXmr45tLJ8&is=e_ddXwKl68tSCzO1

7 Aug 2026, 08:29 UTC74 viewsread 8 August 2026

Der Beitrag ist vom 13. Mai 2026; ich glaube nicht, daß es inzwischen besser wurde. 😏 Tom

7 Aug 2026, 08:27 UTC93 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

„Jeder hatte Angst, was Falsches zu sagen. Jeder hatte Angst, den Job zu verlieren“ https://www.nachdenkseiten.de/?p=150342

💯1

6 Aug 2026, 21:59 UTC80 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @MediaGuerillaBerlinPhoto

Ernsthaft? Diese beiden Bilder eine Potato-Cam (1 und 2) sollen die Drohne von Leipzig zeigen. Ganz ehrlich? Für mich sieht das nach einer FPV-Drohne von Temu aus und das "Paket" mit den beiden dicken Leitungen nach einem LiPo-Akku, der sich gelöst hat (Block aus Zellen in silberner Pouch-Folie). Wenn das der Akku ist, stellt sich die Frage wo der Sprengstoff sein soll. Wenn das der Sprengstoff sein soll, stellt sich

2

6 Aug 2026, 17:04 UTC78 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

💥🤥 Behind Trump's bravado, the US doesn't have enough missiles to wage war against Iran — or elsewhere Donald Trump finally collided with reality over depleted US weapons stockpiles – blaming Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, who in turn blamed his deputy, in a buck-passing game that laid bare the White House's and the Pentagon's staggering incompetence. 🔴 Shortages of critical munitions – especially long-range guided

1

6 Aug 2026, 17:04 UTC83 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

💥🤥 Hinter Trumps großspurigen Äußerungen verbergen sich die Tatsache, dass die USA nicht über genügend Raketen verfügen, um einen Krieg gegen den Iran – oder anderswo – zu führen Donald Trump wurde schließlich mit der Realität der erschöpften US-Waffenvorräte konfrontiert – und gab Kriegsminister Pete Hegseth die Schuld, der wiederum seinen Stellvertreter beschuldigte, in einem Spiel der Schuldzuweisungen, das die e

🕊2

6 Aug 2026, 15:51 UTC83 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Drohnenvorfall am Leipziger Flughafen: Steckt das „Celler Loch“ dahinter... https://youtube.com/watch?v=tnZBNA2_Dkk&is=wRwsiYrZUvGmlNk_

2

6 Aug 2026, 11:28 UTC79 viewsread 8 August 2026

" ... „Explosion“ der Rohölpreise von 150 US-Dollar und mehr vorausgesagt. Obgleich sich die Versorgungslage seit März noch einmal deutlich verschlechtert hat, wird Öl zurzeit für rund 80 US-Dollar gehandelt, was dem langjährigen Durchschnitt entspricht. Wie konnten die Experten so deutlich danebenliegen? Die Antwort ist ebenso einfach wie für viele überraschend: China – der mit Abstand größte Ölimporteur der Welt –

6 Aug 2026, 11:28 UTC89 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Für unsere Transatlantiker zum Mitschreiben: Während die USA weltweit zündelt und Trump aus purem kurzsichtigem Eigeninteresse drauf und dran ist, die Weltwirtschaft ins Chaos stürzen, ist China der Anker für Stabilität. Wäre es da nicht an der Zeit, die deutsche Außen- und Wirtschaftspolitik diesen Realitäten anzupassen?"

👍1🤣1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @wir_wollen_reden. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Wir Wollen Reden:” (@wir_wollen_reden), 388 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wir_wollen_reden.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.