Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
11 measurements spanning 40 days, net -24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,782–1,817 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 19:01
1,786
-2
11 Sept 2026, 17:17
1,788
+1
7 Sept 2026, 09:19
1,787
-5
2 Sept 2026, 11:54
1,792
-7
30 Aug 2026, 02:07
1,799
-2
27 Aug 2026, 03:42
1,801
-4
24 Aug 2026, 11:34
1,805
-6
20 Aug 2026, 08:43
1,811
-2
14 Aug 2026, 06:09
1,813
+3
7 Aug 2026, 06:00
1,810
no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:48
1,810
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 17 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
418 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
156
37.3%
👍
122
29.2%
❤
80
19.1%
custom 5404737152514807182
23
5.50%
custom 5307767455374926379
17
4.07%
😁
16
3.83%
👎
2
0.478%
😱
2
0.478%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 418 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 17 April 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 19 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @wiscow_channel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 April 2026 to 2 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Brandformance — это красивое слово, чтобы назвать кампанию, которая не измерилась.
Интересный и острый спич выдал Александр Лебедев, директор по маркетингу ГК ФСК, на конференции AdIndex City 2026:
«Мы говорим, что наружка не измеряется, а диджитал измеряется. Но есть нюансы. Мне кажется, весь наш рекламный рынок - про нюансы.
Если у тебя мэтч данных в диджитале составляет всего 20–25%, то можно, конечно, говорить…
Эти 15 минут освободят вам десятки часов в ближайшие месяцы
По воскресеньям я вместе с нейронкой подвожу итоги недели: заполняю дневник, наговариваю нейронке контекст в свой «второй мозг» и подвожу итоги.
Хочу поделиться очень простым, но невероятно полезным упражнением, которое сам периодически делаю во время итогов.
7 вопросов для общения с неройнкой:
1) Откройте календарь или тасктрекер и расскажите (важно гол…
Требовательность равно токсичность?
Впервые пост дублируется 3ий раз, первый раз написан был еще в апреле 2024.
Ну уж больно актуальная тема)
Прямая градация - чем больше человек лентяй - тем больше от него ОС про великую токсичность руководителя.
Работать надо!)
Я уже слышал в своей адрес от узкого числа людей клейм токсичности и задумался, что всех их объединяет? Понял – не соответствие высоким стандартам работы:…
Агентский Интернет
(не, тут не про СК на программатик, тут про будущее)
Мы привыкли думать, что клиент бренда — это человек, но эта модель заканчивается. В 2026-2027 годах ожидается массовое появление AI-агентов, которые будут формулировать запросы, сравнивать варианты и все чаще становиться посредником между брендом и покупателем.
Это значит, что скоро ваш продукт будут выбирать не только глазами, эмоциями и рекла…
Мне всегда везет с командами
Рынок труда 2026 - интересная штука.
Вроде специалистов много, предложение в разы превышает спрос. Но настоящих игроков, которые перфомят и реально двигают бизнес, не найти. А без команды не рванешь. Спетая, крутая команда - это мощь и суперсила.
Кого нет и не будет в моей команде:
1. «Это не моя зона» / «Дайте ТЗ»
Сейчас, когда ИИ пишет код и тексты за секунды, ценность человека - мыс…
Китайский CTV: почему большой экран — это не телевизор
Максим Витт, директор по развитию бизнеса Adspector, специально для @dmcrus — о том, почему в Китае CTV давно стал самостоятельной медиасредой, а не просто «большим мобильным экраном», и какие тренды уже докатываются до российского рынка.
Как устроен ландшафт китайского CTV
Китайский рынок Smart TV — это автономная и глубоко интегрированная экосистема, которая…
ИИ в медицине
ИИ в медицине многие понимают слишком примитивно: как будто скоро появится бот, который просто заменит врача. На деле главный сдвиг вообще не в этом, а в том, что медицина постепенно уходит от лечения «среднего пациента» к работе с конкретным человеком.
Раньше система была устроена грубо. Есть жалобы, есть анализы, есть усредненный протокол лечения, дальше человека стараются встроить в типовую клиниче…
Самая дорогая вредная привычка в бизнесе — часовые встречи
Закон Паркинсона гласит: работа заполняет всё время, которое на неё выделили.
Дай задаче день и вместе с ИИ сделаешь главное. Дай неделю и много времени раздуешь на обсуждения, улучшайзинг и лишнее усложнение.
Я реально замечаю это по своему календарю, в котором веду планирование дня, а не в ToDo.
Ввёл два простых правила:
• любая встреча по умолчанию вм…
С Днем Победы!
Ну вот почему нельзя делать шоу на Мамаевом Кургане круглый год или хотя бы летом. Такой турпоток был бы…
🤘
❤14🔥9👍4👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @wiscow_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
С какой песней группа ТаТу выступала на Евровидении 2003?
Нас не догонят39%
Не верь, не бойся, не проси23%
Я сошла с ума19%
You and I19%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 17 April 2026 to 2 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ВАКАНСИИ НАРАСХВАТ @respond_to_work · 21,987 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 22 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Висков: Продажи, Маркетинг и Эффективность” (@wiscow_channel), 1,786 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wiscow_channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
