Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for WLAD2 | Логи SEO-архитектора

Channel

WLAD2 | Логи SEO-архитектора

@wlad2chanel

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

447subscribers

+14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001074234880
TypeChannel
Username@wlad2chanel
CreatedBetween 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/wlad2chanel

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

432447439.57 August 2026 — 433 subscribers8 August 2026 — 432 subscribers16 August 2026 — 433 subscribers31 August 2026 — 435 subscribers10 September 2026 — 444 subscribers19 September 2026 — 447 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 43 days, net +14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 430–449 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 04:16447+3
10 Sept 2026, 19:55444+9
31 Aug 2026, 20:44435+2
16 Aug 2026, 02:08433+1
8 Aug 2026, 03:53432-1
7 Aug 2026, 03:46433first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

61 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤡1829.5%
🔥1727.9%
👍1321.3%
711.5%
custom 546111744161246224258.20%
custom 521967583788795626811.64%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 61 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 04:46 UTC117 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Сгенерил 1 пост и он сразу же попал в ответы Алисы на поиске Яндекса и виной всему эти триплеты 💁‍♂️

🤡2👍1

28 Jul 2026, 15:18 UTC538 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Год назад собрал одностраничный лендинг через ChatGPT. Благодаря подгонке плотности слов под Яндекс страница вышла в топ-10 без накрутки ПФ. Дальше подробно покажу, как устроена страница, и дам примерное понимание, что нужно делать. Возможно, чуть позже открою инструмент вживую и покажу, как быстро провернуть то же самое на любой странице любого сайта. Привет Джилавдарову, у которого тошнота в Яндексе не работает )

🔥9🤡54custom 54611174416124622422

22 Jul 2026, 16:49 UTC453 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

клод отказался писать всякий бред про известных людей, я ему говорю так проверяй инфу и потом пиши лол )

custom 52196758378879562681

22 Jul 2026, 10:37 UTC380 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

кек, хочу a/b тест сделать и посмотреть на какую фотку будет клевать, ставим ставки господа ) кому бы вы деньги понесли 1 или 2?

20 Jul 2026, 16:23 UTC350 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Юзаете букмарклеты?

  1. Да48%
  2. Нет20%
  3. У меня их парочку12%
  4. У меня их более 1014%
  5. Часто свои пишу через ИИ16%
  6. Просто посмотреть ответы14%

The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🤡32👍1🔥1

17 Jul 2026, 14:00 UTC321 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

как думаете зачем они столько h2 напихали на страницу? 😃

14 Jul 2026, 06:40 UTC326 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

тут все хорошо и имя домена и плитка в подвале ) https://luchshie-remontnye-kompanii-moskvy.com/ и Гуглу норм такое )

🔥3

8 Jul 2026, 12:04 UTC363 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

В прошлом месяце Дмитрий Шахов был проездом в Петербурге и провёл тут GEO-шную конференцию. Один человек, с которым я там общался, сказал примерно так: ехал на SEO-конференцию, а попал на GEO. С этого мы нормально поржали. Ещё запомнился один мужик, который рассказывал, что почти весь поток заявок на SEO у них построен через перехват. Есть свой колл-центр: люди заходят на сайты, потом им звонят и предлагают SEO. По

👍1🔥1

5 Jul 2026, 08:26 UTC409 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вчера на афтепати сео клаба спб очень громко поднимали тосты за триплеты, это всех улыбнуло 😜, сижу вспомнил улыбнулся еще раз Много фидбэка позитивного, был приятно удивлен, всем спасибо. Видео с афтепати https://youtu.be/owU2UvMtV5w

👍5

29 Jun 2026, 13:25 UTC462 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Итак, коллеги, вижу, откликнулся всего один человек — @mikejordan. Мне даже не придётся ничего в ИИ пихать 😄 Видимо, все остальные, кто хотел попасть на конференцию, уже купили себе билеты. И я, кстати, таких знаю — уже обсуждали, с кем пересечёмся на конфе. А кому было обломно участвовать — напишите почему? Рядом никто не живёт и не может приехать? Или страшно пукнуть в комментариях, а потом не выиграть? 😄

🤡2

23 Jun 2026, 16:57 UTC≈2,890 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

поставил себе строку бегущую на сайт и так кайфонул от того что клод это сгенерил за 5 минут, готовый плагин, раньше я такое делал на форум и женский сайт, платил проггеру денег, а тут пук и все готово, не идеально в плане функционала, но блин 5 минут кстати какой же кайф когда строчка бежит, у меня прям ощущение что сайт живой

🤡3custom 54611174416124622423

22 Jun 2026, 19:02 UTC583 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Когда везде эти триплеты мерещатся

👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @wlad2chanel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

20 Jul 2026, 16:23 UTCAnonymous Poll50 voters

Юзаете букмарклеты?

  1. Да48%
  2. Нет20%
  3. У меня их парочку12%
  4. У меня их более 1014%
  5. Часто свои пишу через ИИ16%
  6. Просто посмотреть ответы14%

The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“WLAD2 | Логи SEO-архитектора” (@wlad2chanel), 447 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wlad2chanel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.