Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 吃遍天下瓜

Channel

吃遍天下瓜

@woaichigua0

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

23,488subscribers

+17,486 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001591906565
TypeChannel
Username@woaichigua0
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/woaichigua0

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

7.2 average views per post against 23,488 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.031%. Across the 1,639 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,006–31,616 subscribers, posting mainly in Chinese — the middle half sit between 1.44% and 7.73%, with a median of 3.33%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (25 August 2026 24 September 2026)
Posts measured36 of 36 published in the window (36 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled260
Mature posts only0.042% over 10 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers23,488 measured 18 September 2026
Cohortb10000:zho · 1,639 channels · p10 0.442% · p25 1.44% · p50 3.33% · p75 7.73% · p90 14.7%
Position in cohort0.794th percentile · 1/111 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.123% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageChinese · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 24 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

5,85723,48814,672.56 August 2026 — 6,002 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,006 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,957 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,949 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5,857 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,821 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,814 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,798 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,787 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,779 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,723 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,589 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,364 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,148 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,889 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,702 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,484 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,279 subscribers4 September 2026 — 9,383 subscribers9 September 2026 — 8,403 subscribers13 September 2026 — 15,035 subscribers14 September 2026 — 19,735 subscribers16 September 2026 — 19,499 subscribers18 September 2026 — 23,488 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
24 measurements spanning 43 days, net +17,486. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,212–26,133 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 15:0123,488+3,989
16 Sept 2026, 06:4019,499-236
14 Sept 2026, 14:3719,735+4,700
13 Sept 2026, 03:5715,035+6,632
9 Sept 2026, 05:198,403-980
4 Sept 2026, 02:579,383-896
2 Sept 2026, 18:0810,279-205
1 Sept 2026, 14:4210,484-218
31 Aug 2026, 13:5710,702-187
30 Aug 2026, 14:2510,889+741
29 Aug 2026, 11:4910,148-216
28 Aug 2026, 09:0510,364-225
27 Aug 2026, 09:0410,589-134
26 Aug 2026, 06:0210,723-56
25 Aug 2026, 06:2210,779-8
24 Aug 2026, 03:5310,787-11
22 Aug 2026, 11:3610,798-16
21 Aug 2026, 02:0410,814-7
20 Aug 2026, 00:0210,821+4,964
16 Aug 2026, 17:535,857first reading

Engagement

149 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.031%
avg views ÷ 23,488 subscribers
Avg views / post
7.2
36 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
36
of 149 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held149 (6 August 202629 August 2026)
Views total260
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 04:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 33m
Average length
56s

Measured directly from 101 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 149 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 149 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 02:23 UTC2 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🥱😀😀😀😔😔 🫥OK游戏中心总押100万U ✅创诚信经营 | 立安全首选 ✅免注册 | 免实名 | 不限IP ✅有上押 | 放心玩 | 才好玩 ——————————————- ➡关注频道置顶 @gaobo⬅ ➡😀😀项福利等你来领⬅ ——————————————- 😀😀😀😀😀😀点击进入 😀😀😀😀😀😀点击进入 😀😀😀😀😀😀点击进入 😩😩😀😀😀😀点击进入 ——————————————- 诚邀个人代理,团队代理,网站站长,飞机群主,有流量即可变现 超高佣金 百分百扶持,巅峰代理模式 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀: @gbvip 😀😀😀😀: @gaobo

28 Aug 2026, 16:48 UTC5 viewsread 29 August 2026
Video

🎁【永盛娱乐|新会员专享 · 首充赠豪礼】 新用户首充即送高额彩金,最高可领1288 USDT! 💎 活动一|新会员首充 💰50 → 送18 💰100 → 送38 💰300 → 送88 💰500 → 送128 💰1000 → 送188 💰5000u → 送588 💰10000u → 送1288 群链接: yinuo.ysyl24.com 🎯 领取条件 ✅ 仅限首次参与本活动的用户 ✅ 彩金+本金完成5倍流水即可提现 ✅ 活动仅限电子游戏类目使用 ⚠️ 重要提醒 充值成功账单不变动 联系财务 @yscw08 领取 严禁一人多号、同IP、同设备、团队套利等违规行为 一经发现违规,将取消活动资格,收回彩金,并扣除所有盈利,只退还本金,并冻结账户 活动最终解释权归永盛娱乐所有

28 Aug 2026, 16:05 UTC5 viewsread 29 August 2026

#频道互推 #相似推荐 ------------------------------ 📢 合肥女奴库 📢 缅北老街吃瓜中心 📢 妈妈 母子 乱伦 新闻 📢 缅北吃瓜社 📢 吃瓜娱乐资讯🔥 @SSBYQ 📢 一线吃瓜网 📢 吃瓜/大曝光 📢 东南亚DJ俱乐部 📢 🍉 全球吃瓜 📢 柬埔寨零距离 ------------------------------ ☁️ 互推入口:@sooo

28 Aug 2026, 12:57 UTC7 viewsread 29 August 2026
Video

徘徊在溺水不溺水之间,救生员被小姐姐迷惑到了

28 Aug 2026, 12:57 UTC7 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

张雪峰的妻子李丽婧太想念张雪峰了,亲自跑到河南看望那个神似张雪峰的烧烤摊摊主 一个考研,一个烤肉,都是84年的属鼠,女儿也同岁,一个张雪峰,一个张耀峰,这世界就是那么巧合……

28 Aug 2026, 12:56 UTC7 viewsread 29 August 2026
Video

老头到底在干嘛?人都快挂到墙上了还不老实,现场画面让人哭笑不得

28 Aug 2026, 12:56 UTC7 viewsread 29 August 2026
Video

兄弟们麻烦翻译下,最后到底成没成啊,可以的话我就跟着学了 #吃瓜 #搞笑 #搭讪 #抽象

28 Aug 2026, 12:56 UTC7 viewsread 29 August 2026
Video

下场遇到低血糖的哥们 刚好下场遇到低血糖的哥们,我来帮帮他 #搞笑 #真人cs #吃瓜 #迷惑行为

Showing the 12 most recent of 149 posts we hold for @woaichigua0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 35 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

欧博/亚星/利博私网/万利私网🅰️环球UG私网
@hgq45 · 3,785
4 posts
欧博亚星利博万利AG贵宾会一比一
@agag1233 · 2,771
3 posts
速搜官方频道-TON中文索引🇨🇳
@cn123 · 8,801
3 posts
速搜❤️‍🔥流量互推/广告交易
@TonAdNews · 11,055
3 posts
欧博亚星环球UG环球360私网一比一
@agag217 · 3,776
2 posts
环球360私网🅰️环球UG私网🅰️利博私网🅰️正网一比一
@agag31223 · 3,641
2 posts
东南亚博客热搜榜/曝光
@bx666aa8 · 5,392
2 posts
经济时政 新闻🌖
@CJXW1 · 9,083
2 posts
皇冠体育 皇冠足球 皇冠代理 欧博代理
@dashuiruanjian47 · 13,959
2 posts
全国楼凤个人资源信息库🔍
@dlpLF · 13,219
2 posts
国漫|全集|动漫🌈集中营🌈
@dongmanjizhongying · 6,045
2 posts
欧博一比一 亚星一比一 利博万利环球UG环球360正网私网
@hgq181 · 3,691
2 posts
环球360私网♣️环球UG私网♣️利博私网♣️正网一比一
@hgq3548 · 3,769
2 posts
i8国际(⚽️2026世界杯专属平台)大品牌秒出款
@usdtoki8 · 5,262
2 posts
免费加速器|免费VPN|免费节点
@xxoohak112 · 7,265
2 posts
求职招聘/东南亚头条
@bx666zz8 · 16,241
1 post
亚星代理🅰️欧博代理🅰️BBIN宝马会代理🅰️亚星欧博/百家乐代理
@dianhaowang7 · 281
1 post
环球UG私网♠️环球360私网♠️利博私网♠️正网一比一
@hgq2166 · 3,705
1 post
亚星私网🅰️欧博私网🅰️皇冠足球正网私网1:1
@oubo2020 · 9,231
1 post
Telegram群组推荐/群组排行/优质群组
@TGroup666 · 5,656
1 post
亚星代理 欧博代理 亚星私网 欧博私网
@yaxing6666 · 7,471
1 post
皇冠代理 皇冠足球 皇冠体育 亚星代理
@yaxing6699 · 10,217
1 post
皇冠代理皇冠体育 皇冠官网 利博真人
@yaxing838 · 853
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“吃遍天下瓜” (@woaichigua0), 23,488 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/woaichigua0.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.