Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for вуфеч архив [ЗАКРЫТО]

Channel

вуфеч архив [ЗАКРЫТО]

@woofech_arhiv

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

356subscribers

-20 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003468374591
TypeChannel
Username@woofech_arhiv
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/woofech_arhiv

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3563843706 August 2026 — 376 subscribers6 August 2026 — 376 subscribers7 August 2026 — 378 subscribers14 August 2026 — 384 subscribers22 August 2026 — 380 subscribers30 August 2026 — 375 subscribers6 September 2026 — 371 subscribers15 September 2026 — 356 subscribers6 August 202615 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 39 days, net -20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 352–388 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 04:01356-15
6 Sept 2026, 17:22371-4
30 Aug 2026, 01:47375-5
22 Aug 2026, 06:58380-4
14 Aug 2026, 21:48384+6
7 Aug 2026, 11:04378+2
6 Aug 2026, 20:19376no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:31376first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

228 reactions across 17 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
13257.9%
😢5725.0%
🤯219.21%
🐳114.82%
💔73.07%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 228 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC180 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026

но я все же буду надеяться что вуфеч когда нибудь извинится перед моей подругой и передо мной. все

14

Signed гнилой пенопласт [Z?] #🚸✂️ #D-Boy'sVersion(real)

3 Aug 2026, 12:43 UTC182 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

архив если что не закрывается

11

Signed гнилой пенопласт [Z?] #🚸✂️ #D-Boy'sVersion(real)

3 Aug 2026, 12:42 UTC179 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026

крч окончательно заявляю что тема моих отношений с вуфечем закрыта и больше не будет обсуждаться, а так же в хейт вуф кф я больше не вернусь ибо мне надоело участвовать в срачах с вуфом. очень буду надеяться что он понял что натворил и не продолжит творить хуйню как пару месяцев назад

😢16💔5

Signed гнилой пенопласт [Z?] #🚸✂️ #D-Boy'sVersion(real)

3 Aug 2026, 11:41 UTC186 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#предложка ахуеть ос рестора

🤯113💔2

Signed гнилой пенопласт [Z?] #🚸✂️ #D-Boy'sVersion(real)

2 Aug 2026, 22:13 UTC219 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

кинули

3

Signed гнилой пенопласт [Z?] #🚸✂️ #D-Boy'sVersion(real)

2 Aug 2026, 22:13 UTC219 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

спасеба

4

Signed гнилой пенопласт [Z?] #🚸✂️ #D-Boy'sVersion(real)

2 Aug 2026, 22:13 UTC219 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🐳111

Signed гнилой пенопласт [Z?] #🚸✂️ #D-Boy'sVersion(real)

2 Aug 2026, 22:10 UTC214 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#предложка кусок от арта. если у кого то полный есть, можете кинуть, паже? а то я потеряла взломанный тгк вуфа

🤯91

Signed гнилой пенопласт [Z?] #🚸✂️ #D-Boy'sVersion(real)

29 Jul 2026, 22:58 UTC377 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

да и про мое прошлое с ним не оч приятно вспоминать, про это я пожалуй тоже замолчу

10

Signed гнилой пенопласт [Z?] #D-Boy'sVersion(real)

29 Jul 2026, 22:57 UTC377 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

ладно, мне надоело вуфа обсасывать, он и так почти в последнее время нихуя не делает, так что просто продолжу сюда его старые арты заливать, архив же все таки

13

Signed гнилой пенопласт [Z?] #D-Boy'sVersion(real)

29 Jul 2026, 22:18 UTC384 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026

это ощущается как будто твои друзья начинают общаться с твоим буллером, только в моей ситуации админы кф на которого я полагалась начали общаться с человеком которого мне отменить помогали

😢193

Signed гнилой пенопласт [Z?] #D-Boy'sVersion(real)

29 Jul 2026, 22:14 UTC373 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026

не нравится мне все это

18

Signed гнилой пенопласт [Z?] #D-Boy'sVersion(real)

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @woofech_arhiv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“вуфеч архив [ЗАКРЫТО]” (@woofech_arhiv), 356 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/woofech_arhiv.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.