Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Woo

Channel

Woo

@woosoheil

Not marked by Telegram, checked 27 August 2026

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,419subscribers

-86 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002204040366
TypeChannel
Username@woosoheil
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/woosoheil

Growth

7,4197,6077,5136 August 2026 — 7,505 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,505 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,506 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,561 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,607 subscribers15 August 2026 — 7,588 subscribers18 August 2026 — 7,572 subscribers21 August 2026 — 7,543 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,502 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,480 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,471 subscribers3 September 2026 — 7,460 subscribers9 September 2026 — 7,419 subscribers6 August 20269 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 34 days, net -86. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,391–7,635 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 07:597,419-41
3 Sept 2026, 13:587,460-11
31 Aug 2026, 06:037,471-9
28 Aug 2026, 07:567,480-22
25 Aug 2026, 03:467,502-41
21 Aug 2026, 12:467,543-29
18 Aug 2026, 07:427,572-16
15 Aug 2026, 17:377,588-19
12 Aug 2026, 02:527,607+46
9 Aug 2026, 08:027,561+55
6 Aug 2026, 08:107,506+1
6 Aug 2026, 03:077,505no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:197,505first reading

Engagement

50 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.8%
avg views ÷ 7,419 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,180
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
21
of 50 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026
Posts held50 (23 July 202626 August 2026)
Views total24,693
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 22:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 27s
Average length
2m 09s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 49 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @woosoheil. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 50 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 26 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

24 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC885 viewsread 28 August 2026

🔸دلار آمریکا : 202,700 🔸دلار کانادا : 146,940 🔸یورو : 236,760 🔸پوند انگلیس : 276,590 🔸درهم امارات : 55,300 🔸یوآن چین : 30,160 🔸لیر ترکیه : 4,215 🔸سکه امامی : 223,000,000 🔸نیم سکه : 114,000,000 🔸ربع سکه : 62,500,000 🔸 گرم طلای 18 : 22,230,940 🔸مثقال طلا : 96,300,000 🔸تتر : 201,250 🔸اونس طلا : 4,637.5 🔸اونس نقره : 68.82 🔸بیت کوین : 77,384 @sarafha_com 👈 13:30 دوشنبه 2 شهریور 1405

24 Aug 2026, 09:45 UTC816 viewsread 28 August 2026

چرا ارتعاش و انرژی شما روی ادیت و کارتون تأثیر داره؟ 💫 چرا وسط کار زود خسته می‌شیم و بی‌خیالش می‌شیم؟ تو این ویس راجبش حرف زدیم و گفتیم چطور حال و انرژی‌مون می‌تونه روی کیفیت کار و ادامه دادن مسیرمون تأثیر بذاره. 🎧 بخشی از W Course 🎁❤️

22 Aug 2026, 11:10 UTC905 viewsread 28 August 2026

یکی از مبحث های W Course تو W Course خیلی بیشتر به این مسائل پرداختیم

22 Aug 2026, 11:10 UTC928 viewsread 28 August 2026

نوید محمدزاده و ماجرای «ساید گرفتن» توی سوشال‌مدیا 🧩 بچه‌های W Course 🤍 فکر می‌کنم توی سوشال‌مدیا لازم نیست برای هر موضوعی حتماً ساید بگیریم و یکی رو انتخاب کنیم. 🫂 مثلاً ماجرای نوید محمدزاده که بابت موضعش درباره فلسطین بخشی از فالوورهاشو از دست داد، نشون می‌ده چقدر سریع می‌تونیم آدم‌ها رو فقط بر اساس یک موضع قضاوت کنیم.

18 Aug 2026, 17:59 UTC≈1,360 viewsread 28 August 2026

یه چن نفری سفارش داشتن حاجی پیداتون نمیکنم چتام پاک شده 😂 پیام بدین تا بفرستم براتون تموم شده

Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @woosoheil. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

RapTime | خبر فوری
@raptimeorgg · 257,306
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Woo” (@woosoheil), 7,419 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/woosoheil.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.