Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Слово коже

Channel

Слово коже

@wordtoskin

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

12,206subscribers

-139 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001523463255
TypeChannel
Username@wordtoskin
Created11 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/wordtoskin

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

12,20612,34512,275.56 August 2026 — 12,345 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,345 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,344 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,342 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,341 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,337 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,326 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,325 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,322 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,315 subscribers15 August 2026 — 12,313 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,307 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,308 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,305 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,306 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,301 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,297 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,289 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,286 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,280 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,277 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,273 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,271 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,264 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,260 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,256 subscribers4 September 2026 — 12,245 subscribers6 September 2026 — 12,243 subscribers9 September 2026 — 12,237 subscribers11 September 2026 — 12,226 subscribers13 September 2026 — 12,215 subscribers15 September 2026 — 12,209 subscribers17 September 2026 — 12,206 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net -139. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,185–12,366 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 09:3712,206-3
15 Sept 2026, 10:0012,209-6
13 Sept 2026, 15:2112,215-11
11 Sept 2026, 22:3612,226-11
9 Sept 2026, 15:5612,237-6
6 Sept 2026, 10:5512,243-2
4 Sept 2026, 03:2012,245-11
2 Sept 2026, 18:5812,256-4
1 Sept 2026, 16:2212,260-4
31 Aug 2026, 12:5912,264-7
30 Aug 2026, 12:2612,271-2
28 Aug 2026, 11:2412,273-4
27 Aug 2026, 07:5712,277-3
26 Aug 2026, 04:5312,280-6
25 Aug 2026, 06:5812,286-3
24 Aug 2026, 10:1412,289-8
22 Aug 2026, 19:3312,297-4
21 Aug 2026, 09:0712,301-5
20 Aug 2026, 11:4712,306+1
19 Aug 2026, 10:0212,305first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 20 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

241 reactions across 7 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥8736.1%
6225.7%
👍3715.4%
🥰197.88%
🤷145.81%
🙏104.15%
72.90%
👌20.83%
😢20.83%
🎉10.415%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 241 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 20 April 2026 to 29 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
14.3%
1 of 7 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
1,740
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
1,760
over 6 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2SDnjeN9qtE120 April 202620 April 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 20 April 2026 to 29 April 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

29 Apr 2026, 13:10 UTC≈9,620 views54 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Моете голову, но не чувствуете, что она чистая на 100%? 💇🚿 Возможно, на коже скопились ороговевшие клетки, остатки сухого шампуня или кожного сала. Говорят, проблему решает детокс скальпа — попросили дерматолога и трихолога Лианну Казарян объяснить, как он работает и кому подходит. А в каких вы отношениях с перхотью? 😢 — близкие подруги 🙏 — она иногда заглядывает в гости 🔥 — ни разу не встречались #СловоЭксперту

🔥28🙏108👍5😢2🎉1

28 Apr 2026, 11:24 UTC≈2,610 views21 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

📝 На упаковке написано: «Сокращает морщины». Да-да. Но кто вообще решил, что сыворотка, которую вы купили вчера, дает какой-то эффект? Продукты проходят через клинические исследования — о них и рассказываем в новом эпизоде подкаста «Слово коже: Диалоги с экспертами». Слушайте выпуск в Apple Podcasts, на Яндекс Музыке и ВКонтакте. Подключайтесь, чтобы знать о производстве косметики еще больше ✨ #Подкаст Подписыва

👍95🔥5👌2

27 Apr 2026, 12:15 UTC≈2,000 views48 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🪒 Сколько раз вы слышали, что бритва делает волосы жесткими? Мы слышим постоянно, поэтому попросили дерматолога Алену Щербатых объяснить, верить этому или нет, а заодно дать инструкцию по бритью для чайников. Не поскупитесь на огонечки, если хотите, чтобы Алена разобрала мифы о лазерной эпиляции 🪴 #СловоВолосам #СловоЭксперту

🔥367🥰5

25 Apr 2026, 16:11 UTC≈1,760 views16 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Poll

Как дерматологи оценивают эффективность продукта?

  1. По данным исследований и измерениям состояния кожи77%
  2. По впечатлениям участников от использования средства6%
  3. По внешней оценке кожи после нанесения продукта13%
  4. По отзывам о том, как средство ощущается на коже4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍10🔥42

24 Apr 2026, 13:20 UTC≈1,760 views34 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Да, этот пост снова о ретиноле 😀 Точнее, о его природном младшем брате бакучиоле, который расположил к себе миллионы обладательниц чувствительной кожи мягкостью и дружелюбием. Спросили у дерматовенеролога и косметолога Ирины Гнединой, чем он лучше обычного ретинола и как вводить его в уход. А как вы относитесь к бакучиолу? 🥰 — нравится! ⚡️ — не зашло 🤷 — пока не пробовал(-а) #СловоЭксперту #СловоИнгредиенту

🤷14🥰127👍1

22 Apr 2026, 10:16 UTC≈1,690 views40 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Даже маленькие действия приближают к цели 🩵 #СловоКоже_Цитата

29🔥9🥰2

20 Apr 2026, 11:45 UTC≈1,740 views28 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Advertisementerid 2SDnjeN9qtEPhoto

❔Черные точки или сальные нити — вот в чем вопрос. Разбираемся с косметологом и дерматологом Елизаветой Гинтовт, что это за загадочные сальные нити и чем они отличаются от темных собратьев. Листайте карточки! А если ищете средство для умывания, которое способно помочь от комедонов, попробуйте Очищающий пенящийся гель Effaclar для чувствительной жирной кожи лица и тела от La Roche-Posay. Он бережно удаляет загрязнен

👍1211🔥5

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @wordtoskin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

25 Apr 2026, 16:11 UTCAnonymous Quiz131 voters

Как дерматологи оценивают эффективность продукта?

  1. По данным исследований и измерениям состояния кожи77%
  2. По впечатлениям участников от использования средства6%
  3. По внешней оценке кожи после нанесения продукта13%
  4. По отзывам о том, как средство ощущается на коже4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 20 April 2026 to 29 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Слово коже” (@wordtoskin), 12,206 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wordtoskin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.