Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ВОРМЫЧ

Channel

ВОРМЫЧ

@wormganger

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

29,804subscribers

+942 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001196594840
TypeChannel
Username@wormganger
Created11 February 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/wormganger

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

35,900 average views per post against 29,830 subscribers — an engagement rate of 120.5%. Across the 24,284 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,001–31,620 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.53% and 21.9%, with a median of 11.2%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (9 August 2026 8 September 2026)
Posts measured9 of 9 published in the window (0 exact, 9 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled323,540
Mature posts only133.1% over 8 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers29,830 measured 5 September 2026
Cohortb10000:rus · 24,284 channels · p10 2.82% · p25 5.53% · p50 11.2% · p75 21.9% · p90 39.5%
Position in cohort99.662th percentile · 10.8× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.092% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 8 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

28,81729,83929,3286 August 2026 — 28,862 subscribers6 August 2026 — 28,867 subscribers7 August 2026 — 28,866 subscribers8 August 2026 — 28,850 subscribers10 August 2026 — 28,826 subscribers11 August 2026 — 28,817 subscribers12 August 2026 — 28,872 subscribers14 August 2026 — 29,061 subscribers15 August 2026 — 29,141 subscribers16 August 2026 — 29,574 subscribers18 August 2026 — 29,664 subscribers19 August 2026 — 29,724 subscribers20 August 2026 — 29,780 subscribers21 August 2026 — 29,795 subscribers22 August 2026 — 29,798 subscribers24 August 2026 — 29,778 subscribers25 August 2026 — 29,777 subscribers26 August 2026 — 29,798 subscribers27 August 2026 — 29,796 subscribers28 August 2026 — 29,803 subscribers29 August 2026 — 29,808 subscribers30 August 2026 — 29,815 subscribers31 August 2026 — 29,816 subscribers1 September 2026 — 29,818 subscribers2 September 2026 — 29,834 subscribers3 September 2026 — 29,839 subscribers5 September 2026 — 29,830 subscribers8 September 2026 — 29,804 subscribers29,8046 August 20268 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 34 days, net +942. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,664–29,992 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 17:5729,804-26
5 Sept 2026, 10:1729,830-9
3 Sept 2026, 12:3929,839+5
2 Sept 2026, 09:1229,834+16
1 Sept 2026, 12:2429,818+2
31 Aug 2026, 09:5429,816+1
30 Aug 2026, 13:0429,815+7
29 Aug 2026, 10:3729,808+5
28 Aug 2026, 10:5829,803+7
27 Aug 2026, 09:0429,796-2
26 Aug 2026, 11:4329,798+21
25 Aug 2026, 09:1129,777-1
24 Aug 2026, 06:1529,778-20
22 Aug 2026, 13:2429,798+3
21 Aug 2026, 04:1329,795+15
20 Aug 2026, 03:0429,780+56
19 Aug 2026, 00:3529,724+60
18 Aug 2026, 00:1129,664+90
16 Aug 2026, 21:5429,574+433
15 Aug 2026, 13:3829,141first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 2 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
120.6%
avg views ÷ 29,804 subscribers
Avg views / post
35,900
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.79%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 September 2026
Posts held23 (2 July 20264 September 2026)
Views total323,540
Reactions total12,264
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Sept 2026, 01:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 39s
Average length
33s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

21,685 reactions across 23 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🕊11,17451.5%
custom 52084399629234486996,19728.6%
💯4,31419.9%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21,685 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 4 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
717
across the posts below
Posts paid on
17
of 23 we hold a reading for · 74%
Most on one post
428
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @wormganger. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 July 2026 to 4 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Sept 2026, 20:54 UTC≈11,600 views469 reactions1 Starread 7 September 2026
Video

🏴‍☠️🩸❤️

custom 5208439962923448699320🕊78💯71

3 Sept 2026, 15:10 UTC≈5,840 views142 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Photo

Канал своих пацанов по рэпу! Залетайте! добейте 22к - @TRAP

🕊88custom 520843996292344869932💯22

1 Sept 2026, 13:51 UTC≈17,400 views1,159 reactions8 Starsread 7 September 2026
Forwarded from @molodoykaluga

Здоровья Рианочке ! Динамика реально очень положительная , очень много кушает , радуется мелочам и любит играть .

🕊744💯219custom 5208439962923448699196

1 Sept 2026, 13:26 UTC≈25,700 views2,170 reactions82 Starsread 7 September 2026
Photo

🏴‍☠️ Записки Ворма#6 🏴‍☠️ Всем привет, ребята! Это я, Саня Ворм. Спешу сообщить вам новости о состоянии Ри. Вот что могу рассказать на данный момент. На позапрошлой неделе Риану перевели из реанимации в нейрохирургию, а на прошлой неделе из нейрохирургии — уже в реабилитацию. Риана в ясном сознании: кушает, разговаривает, улыбается, смотрит мультики и так далее. ❤️ Но пока что она не ходит из-за перелома ноги и ком

🕊1,500custom 5208439962923448699371💯299

22 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC≈24,200 views603 reactions10 Starsread 7 September 2026

Скоро новый пост в формате «Записки Ворма» 🏴‍☠️

💯385custom 5208439962923448699130🕊88

16 Aug 2026, 05:59 UTC≈38,400 views1,825 reactions20 Starsread 7 September 2026

Уважаемые паблики, СМИ и т.д. будьте добры проверяйте информацию которую вы постите! Особенно хочется выделить Рифмы и Панчи, ведь вы транслируете на аудиторию 1,5 млн чел. Уберите ОСЛА из своей редакции, поставьте на его место хотя бы обезьяну, она будет более компетентна. Почему то ваш ОСЁЛ прикрепил к посту о инциденте фото моей сестры! и видимо не вкурсе что за "мелкое хулиганство" обычно выписывают штраф 500р, н

custom 52084399629234486991,180🕊384💯261

15 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC≈116,000 views4,120 reactions428 Starsread 7 September 2026

Ребята, здравствуйте! Это Саня Ворм, и я пишу это всё с трудом, т.к. эмоционально меня нет. Я не могу и не смогу передать словами какой ужас я переживаю и испытываю, без преувеличения такое не пожелаю даже самому злейшему врагу. Не вижу смысла пересказывать этот ужас, вы сами знаете ситуацию от ТВ и новостных пабликов. Я узнаю о ситуации практически столько же. Я никогда не пойму, почему моей доченьке пришлось пережи

🕊3,040custom 5208439962923448699603💯477

13 Aug 2026, 01:06 UTC≈45,100 views1,114 reactions2 Starsread 7 September 2026
Photo

😈 Записки Ворма#5 😈 Всем привет, дописываю вам вторую часть своих последних дней на свободе, родные 👋❤️ Вторая часть. 29 число я провел дома, вместе с детьми. Получил позитив, собрался к ДР, место выбрали, гостей пригласили, всё готово. Спокойный, добрый семейный день. 🎉🥳Праздновать свой юбилей я решил с 30 на 31. (др у меня 31 если чо 😂), а дальше как пойдёт. Плейсом для празднования я выбрал небольшой клуб кото

🕊798custom 5208439962923448699200💯116

10 Aug 2026, 09:54 UTC≈39,300 views662 reactions15 Starsread 7 September 2026
Video

😈 Записки Ворма#5 😈 Всем привет ребята! 🤝Поймал себя на мысли что довольно часто вспоминаю последнюю неделю перед #, она была реально насыщенной. Я думаю поделюсь ею с вами, всё равно делать нечего 😃 Часть первая. Питер: 26-е вечер, допивая бутылку вина беру сумку и неспеша выхожу во двор и ожидаю, вот вот уже должны были подъехать Артем менеджер и наш друг водитель Лева, который приехал только что из Питера, точн

🕊460custom 5208439962923448699115💯87

8 Aug 2026, 13:59 UTC≈31,900 views472 reactions1 Starread 7 September 2026

В понедельник новые «Записки Ворма» 🏴‍☠️

🕊300custom 5208439962923448699107💯65

5 Aug 2026, 05:24 UTC≈35,600 views770 reactionsread 7 September 2026

Скоро будут опубликованы новые «Записки Ворма» в обновлённом формате. Ставьте реакции, если хотите увидеть их как можно скорее! 🤝❤️

🕊467custom 5208439962923448699186💯117

29 Jul 2026, 15:17 UTC≈67,200 views1,388 reactions55 Starsread 7 September 2026

😈 Записки Ворма#4 😈 Друзья мои, всем по привету! 👋 Давненько я вам ничего не писал сюда. Вот, думаю, пришла пора. 😃 Для начала хотел бы сказать, что материал ещё будет, причём в скором времени! Чувствую себя хорошо, даже скажу более: уже 4 месяца абсолютной трезвости, занятий спортом и чтения книг. Разум прояснился настолько, насколько я уже не мог себе представить. 💪Осознал, что, будучи зависимым от алкоголя и веще

🕊848custom 5208439962923448699331💯209

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @wormganger. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@wormganger edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
18 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Jul 2026, 14:35 UTCAnonymous Poll5,360 voters approx.

Какой трек с альбома больше всего вам зашёл?

  1. снова21%
  2. для себя15%
  3. процессинг16%
  4. напор12%
  5. нож20%
  6. спорт11%
  7. был на броуке17%
  8. всех своих10%
  9. геннадий35%

The shares total 157%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 4 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

frogboi пишет альбом
@frogboiondablock · 118
6 posts
МОЛОДОЙ КАЛУГА
@molodoykaluga · 28,718
6 posts
DIKIE KRIKI HADES
@dikiekriki · 245
5 posts
HOOD2HOOD
@h2h_hood2hood · 9,156
3 posts
ляныч
@pussydemolisher666 · 8,333
3 posts
SC™️
@sokolcrew · 344
3 posts
Милок
@milokktotakoy · 176
2 posts
PAVLЮХА🇷🇺
@pavluhaaaaaaa · 282
2 posts
AKEEM
@akeemakeemakeem · 79
1 post
бэйби гога [baby melo]
@babymelo_1 · 144,222
1 post
Big Barry
@bigbarrygs · 338
1 post
Candy Flip Boy #certifiedslatty
@candyflipboy2 · 1,911
1 post
CVPSULA
@cvpsula · 1,249
1 post
DIE2TIMES
@die2t1mes · 165
1 post
finallysmokkaa
@finally_smokkaa · 114
1 post
gang engine
@gangenginepsycho · 720
1 post
YG
@geofloy · 81
1 post
АСЫЧ
@h2h_asych · 2,935
1 post
Hi1Gang
@Hi1gang · 22
1 post
hood2hood_archive
@hood2hood_archive · 3,672
1 post
Hunty Hump
@huntyhump1 · 6,172
1 post
Джон Гарик
@johngarik_473 · 55,326
1 post
💊LiL Blassse💊
@lilblasse · 29
1 post
МАНИЛОРД H2H
@manemxneylxrdchanel · 1,553
1 post
Молодой Владимир
@MolodoiVladimir · 10,062
1 post
NEJN31🩸🐺 #GGD
@nein25b · 33
1 post
M A R G I E L A
@nemargiela · 185
1 post
ICYBANDO
@officialicybando · 11,813
1 post
Октябрь
@oktabrj · 12,994
1 post
СФЕРА ОТДЫХА
@OTDOXHNsznn · 75
1 post
ONLYWHITE
@poema666 · 276
1 post
HIMWAY
@qrl_sht · 1,630
1 post
Resowall 🛸 SCM 🧬
@resowallreal1 · 212
1 post
СВОЗИ
@swozzyboo · 5,031
1 post
Birthmark
@theBirthmark · 22
1 post
траков #interpolmostwanted⛈️
@trakovthelord · 6,297
1 post
YungBlessed
@yungblesseddam · 34
1 post
` yunplųuwælkkpurpp D
@yunpluwalkdpurppp · 155
1 post
жабий мир
@zabasabaa · 6
1 post

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 33 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

МОЛОДОЙ КАЛУГА
@molodoykaluga · 28,718
#1
Джон Гарик
@johngarik_473 · 55,326
#2
MNGR David Kurbanov〽️
@davidkurbanov · 3,820
#3
СВОЗИ
@swozzyboo · 5,031
#4
BUDA +
@budaog · 359,129
#5
163ONMYNECK
@on1my6neck3 · 74,742
#6
scalevillain archive
@scalevillainarchive · 2,099
#7
FACELESS ANGEL 😇
@angelhvh33 · 3,130
#8
Moonkid Brothers 🌙
@mayotfamm · 40,715
#9
РЭП СМИ
@rapsmi · 58,348
#10
Магнум
@magnum_opu3 · 5,431
#11
KOOKY (next1kooky) 🐲🐐🍀
@kookybeatstore · 3,208 (as read 8 September 2026)
#12
HOOD MONEY
@hoodmoneymafia · 2,621
#13
MAYOT
@mayotofficialchannel · 205,789
#14
ICYBANDO
@officialicybando · 11,813
#15
scalevillain
@ilovevillains · 76,530
#16
Hunty Hump
@huntyhump1 · 6,172
#17
БЕНДО ВЗАНЕННЫХ
@bendovzane · 1,446
#18
#ZLG BASE
@zlg_base · 44,005
#19
benjamingotbenz
@communitymemory · 27,260
#20
УБИВАЮ BPM
@bpmkiller · 80,340
#21
Рифмы и Панчи 🤯
@rhymestg · 1,400,664
#22
OBLADAET * PLAYERS
@oblagram · 100,187
#23
9mice
@the9mice · 269,252
#24
Молодой Владимир
@MolodoiVladimir · 10,062
#25
ПАША ТЕХНИК LIVE
@pashatechniqueoriginal · 172,465
#26
unki🥀
@unkichat · 66,102
#27
stay_ugly
@stay_ug1y · 7,500
#28
CODEINE CRAZY.
@CodeineCrazyTG · 62,693
#29
AARNE TEAM
@aarneteam · 86,291
#30
bushido zho
@bushidozho · 189,471
#31
ICEGERGERT
@iceicegergert · 73,843
#32
Lovv66
@lovvdoublesix · 155,708
#33
Yarik Larinov
@yariklarinov · 7,032
#34
uglystephan
@uglystephan · 85,968
#35
THRILL РILL
@lilthrill · 42,986
#36
Рифмы и Музыка
@rhymesmus · 378,536
#37
HoodRichLuka
@hoodrichlukaaa · 10,903
#38
Риса за Творчество / РЗТ
@risazatvorchestvo · 162,456
#39
ЖНЕЦ/G4OUR
@gnec4g · 2,888
#40
⛩ Lottery Billz 🐉🏔️
@lotterybillz · 8,493
#41
LIL KRYSTALLL
@lilkrystalll · 92,135
#42
РРХП
@rrhp_b1tch · 13,893
#43
PLOHOY PAREN
@plohoypacan · 382,952
#44

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Джон Гарик
@johngarik_473 · 55,326
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 24 August 2026
бэйби гога [baby melo]
@babymelo_1 · 144,222
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 14 August 2026
ICEGERGERT
@iceicegergert · 73,843
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 19 August 2026
163ONMYNECK
@on1my6neck3 · 74,742
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 19 August 2026
ПАША ТЕХНИК LIVE
@pashatechniqueoriginal · 172,465
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 14 August 2026
#ZLG BASE
@zlg_base · 44,005
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 28 August 2026
Chief Keef Offical
@ChiefKeefOffical · 30,711
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 7 September 2026
tuborosho
@tuboroshochannel · 56,303
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 30 here — alongside 29 others — read 28 August 2026
MARK BULAH HYPE! 💦
@markbulahmoney · 74,438
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 19 August 2026
Улицы не спят/Uragan Hokage 🗣🗣
@hokahed · 112,187
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 25 August 2026
CODEINE CRAZY.
@CodeineCrazyTG · 62,693
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 21 August 2026
URAGAN LUDOMAN
@uraganludoman · 31,736
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 5 September 2026
METOX
@metoxmetox · 31,359
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 6 September 2026
AVENUE GANG
@avenuegang1 · 44,762
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 27 August 2026
лица андеграунда на каждый день.
@LAgroundfamily · 52,392
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 24 August 2026
YASMI FACE CONTROL
@yasmi1eader · 49,720
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 26 August 2026
УБИВАЮ BPM
@bpmkiller · 80,340
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ВОРМЫЧ” (@wormganger), 29,804 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wormganger.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.