Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for маяк

Channel

маяк

@wphareisole

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

37subscribers

+18 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004482121215
TypeChannel
Username@wphareisole
Created1 August 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/wphareisole

Growth

19372812 August 2026 — 19 subscribers12 August 2026 — 22 subscribers19 August 2026 — 30 subscribers26 August 2026 — 31 subscribers3 September 2026 — 37 subscribers12 August 20263 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 23 days, net +18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16–40 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 19:4137+6
26 Aug 2026, 21:0431+1
19 Aug 2026, 02:4630+8
12 Aug 2026, 16:2422+3
12 Aug 2026, 02:0019first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

28 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52200955249122691451553.6%
custom 5219776069539757732725.0%
custom 5220198823170702713310.7%
custom 5222147209314726269310.7%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTC13 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

не чекайте ідеального тексту. сирий, але щирий уривок із нотаток завжди цінніший за вилизаний, але «порожній» допис

custom 52200955249122691454

10 Aug 2026, 08:48 UTC32 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

іноді замість простого «було холодно» варто спробувати описати погоду через навколишнє середовище. якщо дія стається в кімнаті — роздивіться її, зачепіться за один предмет й описуйте його зміни в контексті температури, наприклад. які деталі в книгах зазвичай торкаються вас найбільше — звуки, рухи, почуття…? завдання: спробуйте описати холодну або спекотну погоду в кімнаті.

custom 52200955249122691453custom 52197760695397577322

10 Aug 2026, 08:13 UTC31 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 52200955249122691454custom 52201988231707027131

8 Aug 2026, 21:23 UTC34 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

найважче в творчості — наважитися. момент, коли ти закриваєш нотатки в телефоні й думаєш: «ні, це занадто дивно, сиро, недостатньо, щоб комусь показати». ця студія для того, щоб обʼєднатися разом навколо таких однакових і різних водночас літер і почати. писатимемо разом — читатимемо, відгукуватимемось… робімо те, чого так часто не вистачає — даватимемо підтримку. тексти не мають жити в темряві. у «маяку» починає пр

custom 52221472093147262693custom 52201988231707027131

2 Aug 2026, 07:39 UTC56 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

перша чернетка має бути жахливою найбільший ворог будь-якого тексту — намагання писати одразу як редактор, а не як автор. коли ми вимагаємо від першого речення досконалости, ми перекриваємо собі кисень. перша чернетка — це викладання глини на стіл. з неї потім можна виліпити що завгодно, але спочатку ця глина має з'явитися. дозвольте собі писати погано. спробуйте навмисно написати погане речення, словосполучення, в

custom 52197760695397577322custom 52200955249122691452

1 Aug 2026, 17:46 UTC55 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 52200955249122691452custom 52197760695397577321

1 Aug 2026, 14:33 UTC54 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

«писати — ось це є повітря» я кажу це постійно. писати — це часто самотня і ляклива путь. залишитись один на один з порожнім аркушем і гадати: „комусь це взагалі потрібно?“ тут ми закликаємо всіх бути ввічливими, взаємощирими і чесними. це маяк у незрозумілості написаних і ще не створених літер, це безпечна гавань у темряві. тут немає токсичности, критика є обʼєктивна і неупереджена, знання і навички подаються у к

custom 52197760695397577322custom 52201988231707027131

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @wphareisole. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“маяк” (@wphareisole), 37 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wphareisole.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.