По возможности повзаимодействуйте с постом, пожалуйста 🥺 https://x.com/i/status/2080266450103579065
custom 54113973797755433836❤5🍓4❤🔥1

Channel
@wreathofanemonia
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
125subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001827946342 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wreathofanemonia |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wreathofanemonia |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:07 | 125 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:25 | 126 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:02 | 126 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 2 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
117 reactions across 7 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5310112563353107279 | 30 | 25.6% | |
| ❤ | 20 | 17.1% | |
| 💔 | 17 | 14.5% | |
| custom 5411397379775543383 | 14 | 12.0% | |
| custom 5235799011973152650 | 8 | 6.84% | |
| ❤🔥 | 8 | 6.84% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 6.84% | |
| 🍓 | 4 | 3.42% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 2.56% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 2.56% | |
| custom 5199495916867823076 | 2 | 1.71% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 117 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 2 April 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
По возможности повзаимодействуйте с постом, пожалуйста 🥺 https://x.com/i/status/2080266450103579065
custom 54113973797755433836❤5🍓4❤🔥1
Posted without readable text
Вот бы трахнуть Скара в этом пиджаке 🥺
👍8❤5🤝3custom 54113973797755433831
– ੈ♡‧ Вести игру В казино, где каждый жест — ставка, а каждая улыбка — блеф, один игрок привык полагаться только на холодный расчёт. Лишь чьё-то навязчивое присутствие, которое невозможно игнорировать, ломает его привычный ритм игры. Запах, голос, мимолётное прикосновение — и карты в руках перестают подчиняться логике. Игра затягивается, концентрация внимания падает, а главная угроза оказывается не за столом, а прям…
custom 53101125633531072799custom 54113973797755433837custom 52357990119731526506
Это кстати была шутка Но шутка вышла из-под контроля
💔6😭3custom 51994959168678230762
увидимся через месяц
💔11
— 3 page Йоу #Heartbeat_analyst@wreathofanemonia #scarabedo
custom 531011256335310727911❤🔥7❤4
— 2 page #Heartbeat_analyst@wreathofanemonia #scarabedo
custom 531011256335310727910❤6custom 52357990119731526502
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @wreathofanemonia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Венок из цветов анемоний ||” (@wreathofanemonia), 125 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wreathofanemonia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.