от шопоголизма здесь не лечат!
я Крис, пишу много о бьюти и других женских штучках.
📍Петербург
@writeforfriends_pr
детский канал: @writeformoms
канал с находками: @slozhnoproyti
инст: https://www.instagram.com/kristabely
РКН https://clck.ru/3GEsVg
Created
Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
39 measurements spanning 69 days, net +285. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,441–29,273 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 39
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Oct 2026, 22:10
29,177
+18
13 Oct 2026, 18:21
29,159
+285
10 Oct 2026, 03:37
28,874
+281
5 Oct 2026, 22:36
28,593
-150
30 Sept 2026, 14:38
28,743
-149
18 Sept 2026, 01:58
28,892
-47
15 Sept 2026, 22:41
28,939
-39
14 Sept 2026, 06:37
28,978
+72
12 Sept 2026, 17:17
28,906
+50
10 Sept 2026, 14:41
28,856
+319
7 Sept 2026, 08:18
28,537
-23
4 Sept 2026, 15:19
28,560
-24
3 Sept 2026, 02:04
28,584
-29
2 Sept 2026, 03:08
28,613
-15
1 Sept 2026, 03:15
28,628
-21
30 Aug 2026, 23:16
28,649
-27
29 Aug 2026, 23:48
28,676
-18
28 Aug 2026, 21:23
28,694
-20
27 Aug 2026, 19:36
28,714
-14
26 Aug 2026, 18:04
28,728
first reading
Engagement
193 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 106 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.74%
avg views ÷ 29,177 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,260
108 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.29%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
108
of 193 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 October 2026
Posts held
193 (3 August 2026 – 14 October 2026)
Views total
243,970
Reactions total
5,590
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Oct 2026, 03:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,540
Videos
≈319
Links
≈618
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
12m 42s
Average length
45s
Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
9,062 reactions across 193 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 89.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
8,125
89.7%
⚡
886
9.78%
💘
44
0.486%
💯
7
0.077%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 193 of the 193 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,062 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 193 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 14 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 193 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @writeforfriends. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 193 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 14 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
и еще про масло для душа, я не договорила :)
— это не просто альтернатива гелю! особенно понравится, если после душа кожа стянутая, сухая или шелушится (в отопительный сезон все мы с таким сталкиваемся).
чем оно полезно:
→ мягко очищает кожу
→ поддерживает защитный барьер
→ уменьшает ощущение сухости и стянутости (если жетская вода, вообще маст)
→ делает кожу более мягкой и гладкой
→ подходит чувствительной, атопичн…
стабильно с наступлением осени моя полка в ванной пополняется литровой банкой масла для душа Bioderma <3
сколько бы всего разного не пробовала, возвращаюсь к нему!
→ очень хорошо смягчает и питает кожу, после него даже крем не обязательно наносить, но я наношу удовольствий ради.
трансформируется в пенку при контакте с водой, хорошо очищает, абсолютно не раздражает кожу. Подходит для атопичной кожи. Пользуемся всей …
если вы хотите добиться эффекта «стеклянной» кожи, забирайте одну из любимых комбинаций у Bhab 🏹
• берем сыворотку Hydra Calm, она отлично увлажняет и поддерживает кожный барьер → затем наносим пептидную маску-пленку, она деликатно отшелушивает и придает упругость → и закрываем все лифтинг-кремом, он наполняет кожу, придает эластичность.
внутри всех средств экстракт гриба чаги (slowchaga™), который помогает сохраня…
запускаю новую рубрику «день с брендом» 🌪️ буду показывать вам свой моноуход, собранный из средств одного бренда.
сегодня делюсь рецептом обалденного сияния, которого я добилась с помощью трех средств Bhab. Идеально, когда хочется, чтобы кожа выглядела на миллион <3
вдохновляю себя и вас на вкусный (и полезный) завтрак ☕️
насохраняла новые тарелочки, делюсь с вами, чтобы вы тоже добавили в избранное!
я кстати вообще без завтрака никогда свой день не начинаю, но знаю, что многие пропускают я этот прием пищи. Вы в какой команде?
❤️ — завтракаю каждый день
💘 — не люблю это делать
какая бы не была погода за окном - ботокс по расписанию :)
сегодня впервые делали в технике full-face, и поменяли препарат на миотокс (много лет ставили диспорт, но в данной технике он не подходит).
Алиса живет в уютном доме с мужем, сыновьями, котом Рыжим и 10 яблонями. И каждый её день - это искренняя и дико смешная попытка оседлать взрослую жизнь, оставаясь в душе немного ребенком.
Настоящая суперсила Алисы - лечить словом, замечать комедию в бытовых неурядицах и напоминать нам о том, что семейная жизнь не только одни сплошные заботы, но и огромное, теплое счастье.
В ее «Бюро» невероятно уютно. Обязательно …
❤39⚡10
Showing the 12 most recent of 193 posts we hold for @writeforfriends. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@writeforfriends edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 October 2026
Most recent edit
10 October 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
SOFIKSHEN здесь! @sofikshenzdes · 20,733 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 5 October 2026
Блог Нечаевой @NechaevaBlog · 44,592 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 25 August 2026
Tanya talks about... @Tanyatalksabout · 45,156 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 26 August 2026
Taty Ilina @tatyilina · 32,177 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 5 September 2026
бесконечный вишлист Софи @sophiaganzburg · 37,980 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 27 August 2026
Your bestie’s diary @yourbestiesdiary · 19,156 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 4 October 2026
Алекс_Самохвалова/Alex_Samohvalova @alex_samohvalova_blog · 32,124 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 6 September 2026
YANSIKK @yansikk · 37,507 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 31 August 2026
На страже красоты😍 @mskateantonova · 19,182 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 4 October 2026
by Ancho 🪐 @varichevaa · 18,312 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 23 September 2026
By Anakossh @anakossssh · 22,735 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 18 September 2026
Дары Пандоры @DarPandori · 59,935 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 30 here — alongside 29 others — read 5 September 2026
Инна Плетнева | Красота моими глазами @innamakeru · 60,289 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 22 August 2026
BEAUTY KISTOCHKA / Кисточка красоты @kistochkalife · 30,445 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 16 September 2026
Beauty_obsession💄 @beauty_obsesion · 37,401 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 4 September 2026
Ночь в отеле. с Анной Трейт. @hotelsnight · 32,955 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 4 September 2026
Poydemsomnoy🕊 @polenukk · 34,067 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 29 August 2026
iyudina_a @iyudina_anya · 24,368 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 30 September 2026
SOFIA 💌 @sofia_molz · 51,448 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 August 2026
хотелка дня! @hotelkadna · 27,606 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 10 September 2026
Pavlychenkoann 💔 @milovidnayanna · 22,684 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 17 September 2026
khvankris @khvankriss · 22,969 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 19 September 2026
KSENY LAPSHINA @kseny_patches · 33,080 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 1 September 2026
ele.chka | уход | беременность @beautyelechka · 26,291 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 48 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“и просто так” (@writeforfriends), 29,177 subscribers as measured 14 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/writeforfriends.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.