Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ibrohim | IELTS 8.5

Channel

Ibrohim | IELTS 8.5

@writingspeaking_with_ibrokhim

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

685subscribers

+36 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001657940068
TypeChannel
Username@writingspeaking_with_ibrokhim
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/writingspeaking_with_ibrokhim

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

64968566713 August 2026 — 649 subscribers13 August 2026 — 652 subscribers21 August 2026 — 664 subscribers27 August 2026 — 668 subscribers2 September 2026 — 670 subscribers10 September 2026 — 682 subscribers17 September 2026 — 685 subscribers13 August 202617 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 36 days, net +36. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 644–690 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 17:39685+3
10 Sept 2026, 13:01682+12
2 Sept 2026, 02:04670+2
27 Aug 2026, 03:13668+4
21 Aug 2026, 01:35664+12
13 Aug 2026, 16:18652+3
13 Aug 2026, 05:03649first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

207 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥10550.7%
😍2110.1%
😱188.70%
🎉157.25%
👏157.25%
🆒104.83%
💯94.35%
👨‍💻83.86%
🤔62.90%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 207 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @writingspeaking_with_ibrokhim. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 June 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 08:26 UTC114 views11 reactionsread 13 August 2026

The bar charts compare the prices of gasoline and petrol in States A and B from 2005 to 2009. Overall, the prices of both fuels in both states increased significantly to reach their peaks in 2008, before falling in the final year. It is also clear that gasoline was consistently more expensive than petrol in both states throughout the period. In State A, the cost of gasoline exceeded that of petrol by $0.20 in each …

🔥7👏1🤔1😱1🆒1

5 Aug 2026, 19:01 UTC283 views26 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Why I sent it, because you give more reactions to such things instead of masterpiece essays

🔥20💯4🤔2

5 Aug 2026, 19:00 UTC273 views36 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😍21🔥7👨‍💻5🆒2🤔1

3 Aug 2026, 14:07 UTC317 views10 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥4👨‍💻2💯2🆒2

3 Aug 2026, 04:15 UTC299 views8 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥5🎉3

27 Jul 2026, 09:59 UTC479 views14 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @CDI_ReportPhoto

🗓 JULY 18 📊 TASK 1: The charts below show the price of fuel in two states of the USA from 2005 to 2009. ✍️ TASK 2: Historical objects in museums all over the world should be returned to their countries of origin. To what extent do you agree or disagree? ✈️ @CDI_Report ✈️ @CDI_Report

🔥8👏4🆒2

16 Jul 2026, 19:00 UTC625 views22 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Monkey type da zo’ri bormi😂

😱14🔥4👏2👨‍💻1💯1

8 Jul 2026, 07:28 UTC839 views10 reactionsread 13 August 2026

The table illustrates the population of New Zealand based on age groups, showing both absolute figures and percentage changes between 2011 and 2012. Overall, the 40-64 and 65+ age groups followed an upward trend, whereas the reverse was true for the 15-19 and under 15 age groups. All these changes resulted in an increase in the total population. It is also clear that 15-19-year olds recorded the highest figures in b…

🔥9👏1

8 Jul 2026, 05:29 UTC566 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @CDI_ReportPhoto

🗓 JULY 3 📊 TASK 1: The table below shows information about the population of New Zealand from 2011 to 2012 by age group. ✍️ TASK 2: In some countries, people can have a variety of food that has been transported from all over the world. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? ✈️ @CDI_Report ✈️ @CDI_Report

🔥5

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @writingspeaking_with_ibrokhim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

IELTS Cambridge 1-18 Full Package Books
@IELTS_CAMBRIDGE1 · 141,563
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ibrohim | IELTS 8.5” (@writingspeaking_with_ibrokhim), 685 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/writingspeaking_with_ibrokhim.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.