Channel
@wtfbr0_0
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
198subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002252617270 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wtfbr0_0 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wtfbr0_0 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 11:39 | 198 | -3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:36 | 201 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:30 | 203 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 203 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 12 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
198 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💘 | 110 | 55.6% | |
| 🍓 | 47 | 23.7% | |
| custom 5461169453666432586 | 18 | 9.09% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 5.05% | |
| ⚡ | 8 | 4.04% | |
| 🎃 | 5 | 2.53% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 198 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 12 April 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
мне напомнили о существовании этого канала и я пришел к вам с очередным воссозданием тгк, клянусь, этот больше не удалю https://t.me/bludmish - тгк с артиками, но я щас в какой то прострации или что. не рисуется у меня в общем, но стараюсь чето постить https://t.me/bludmishchat - инфочат, тоже вродь важная штука. там прайсы, правила, мои осишки и прочее
🍓3
Signed ебать ты майонез 🇬🇧
лан я еще подумаю над всем, поразмышляю
💘11🎃1
Signed миш кгб
или може восстановить этот канал, что б не пересоздавать вечно ,-*
💘8🎃1
Signed миш кгб
брбрбр я не знаю тут ваще кто живчик остался, я в общ тот новы тгк удалил, я хз буду ли восстанавливать, я щас в дичайшем выгорании, я максимум очень глупые картинки рисую. бтв у меня есть щп, може кому надо, я постараюсь кинуть ссылку на него в лс, отпишитесь ок в коммы спасибо за внимание
💘12⚡3🎃1
Signed миш кгб
напоминаю!🤩
💘5
Signed миш кгб
этот канал останется архивом старых работ
💘8
Signed князь батюшка
шота мне очень полюбилось рисовать самого себя
🍓14💘4custom 54611694536664325862
Signed князь батюшка 🥚
ма шейла дэми и я канешна 🗿🗿 @nateyudi
🔥6💘5🍓2
Signed князь батюшка 🥚
немношка джона и меня ;-;
💘13🍓3
Signed князь батюшка 🥚
штош еще артик с ними двумя.-. @nateyudi
💘10🍓4custom 54611694536664325863
Signed князь батюшка 🥚
мне кажется у меня скилл чет скаканул. я если честно, удивлен пиздец ;-;
💘7🍓3🎃2custom 54611694536664325861
Signed князь батюшка 🥚
и моя осишка по фд питта,-, ево зовут Джон он медбрат йоу
custom 54611694536664325867🍓4🔥4
Signed князь батюшка 🥚
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @wtfbr0_0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“переезд||𝙈𝙐𝙎𝙃𝙍𝙊𝙊𝙈 𝙏𝙍𝙄𝙋 | 18+” (@wtfbr0_0), 198 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wtfbr0_0.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.