Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Пельменная😈🥟

Channel

Пельменная😈🥟

@wtsudji1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

70subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002131829142
TypeChannel
Username@wtsudji1
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/wtsudji1

Growth

657067.58 August 2026 — 65 subscribers10 August 2026 — 65 subscribers9 September 2026 — 67 subscribers17 September 2026 — 70 subscribers8 August 202617 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 40 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 64–71 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 07:0170+3
9 Sept 2026, 03:1867+2
10 Aug 2026, 02:4565no change
8 Aug 2026, 14:3265first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

78 reactions across 8 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54629839527949372431823.1%
custom 54183240023828295231519.2%
custom 54724260303733083681417.9%
custom 52557350175055895571215.4%
custom 5373034388290298388911.5%
56.41%
custom 520666517076759630322.56%
😨22.56%
🍓11.28%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 78 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 16:46 UTC30 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Для подшаров это ❌НЕ РЭМИЭЛЛА❌ и ❌НЕ ОЧЕРЕДНАЯ МИКУ❌

custom 54183240023828295233custom 54629839527949372432custom 54724260303733083681

Signed PelmenStalnoi67🍭

9 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTC30 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Заказала один ОЧЕНЬ ОЧЕНЬ сомнительный косплэ, потом узнаете почему, спойлерить не буду...🥺

custom 54629839527949372433custom 54183240023828295232custom 54724260303733083682

Signed PelmenStalnoi67🍭

9 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC33 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Ездила к любимой сеструхе, но фотки у меня только их крутейшей котости, он со мной спал🥺

custom 525573501750558955742custom 52066651707675963032custom 53730343882902983881

Signed PelmenStalnoi67🍭

7 Aug 2026, 21:58 UTC45 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Но на самом деле была большая конкуренция, прошли другие хеллсинговцы в крутых костюмах, я как-то научилась смиряться с таким, ну и пох, все равно мою Интегру хер кто переплюнет, я думаю, все согласятся🌟

custom 52557350175055895573custom 54183240023828295232custom 54629839527949372432

Signed PelmenStalnoi67🍭

7 Aug 2026, 21:57 UTC44 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

К сожалению, мы пролетели💔

😨2custom 52557350175055895571custom 54183240023828295231custom 54629839527949372431custom 54724260303733083681

Signed PelmenStalnoi67🍭

7 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTC52 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

А еще у меня теперь на полочке сидит Сая🌟 Фууу бутлеег фууу бее (мне похуй)

custom 54629839527949372436custom 54183240023828295234custom 547242603037330836821🍓1

Signed PelmenStalnoi67🍭

7 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC79 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Внезапная ночевочка 67 (спланированная) у Жени, посмотрели ужастиков, приготовили шашлык (не смогли на огне и перенесли в аэрогриль), попели песенки, все как обычно было круто, КРОМЕ КОНЦОВКИ. Убирали дом за 3 минуты, потому что приехали ее ролители, а потом полчаса прятались от них, там было столько экшена, жесть, НО В ЦЕЛОМ МНЕ ПОНРАВИЛОСЬ (экспириенс убегунчика я повторять не хочу)

custom 54629839527949372434custom 54183240023828295233custom 53730343882902983882

Signed PelmenStalnoi67🍭

5 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC69 views20 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Смотрите какую милашную штучку сделала, эта жи тру я🤩

custom 54724260303733083688custom 53730343882902983886custom 525573501750558955742

Signed PelmenStalnoi67🍭

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @wtsudji1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Пельменная😈🥟” (@wtsudji1), 70 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wtsudji1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.