Channel
@wx_533
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
25,046subscribers
-2,034 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001891610660 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wx_533 |
| Description | 全网曝光热搜事件 ：专注于揭露事实- 曝光真相-最新动态资讯 -生活故事分享-海外华人求助！ ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🔍 缅甸缅北曝光： @anweitt 🔍柬埔寨曝光: @xinwenbg3 🔍柬埔寨头条： @zzyy_6699 🔍东南亚华人曝光: @xw_339 🔍东南亚前线大事件： @wx_533 🔍东南亚新闻曝光: @facai16161616 🔍迪拜华人曝光: @facail16888889 🔍麻豆国产影视: @cosfeng6 💁📲商务合作： @Wt11234 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 20 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 20 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wx_533 |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Oct 2026, 06:27 | 25,046 | -25 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 03:57 | 25,071 | -3 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 07:21 | 25,074 | -8 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 08:14 | 25,082 | -67 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 08:58 | 25,149 | -18 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 10:16 | 25,167 | -29 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 13:09 | 25,196 | -168 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 22:40 | 25,364 | -50 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 14:19 | 25,414 | -313 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 03:59 | 25,727 | -713 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 12:00 | 26,440 | -1,809 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 23:17 | 28,249 | -672 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 17:02 | 28,921 | -878 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 23:16 | 29,799 | -267 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 08:42 | 30,066 | -669 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 09:40 | 30,735 | +8,063 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 17:40 | 22,672 | -1,320 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 12:38 | 23,992 | -966 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 16:40 | 24,958 | -386 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:53 | 25,344 | first reading |
1,043 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 109 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 476 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,043 (7 August 2026 – 20 October 2026) |
| Views total | 334,447 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 20 Oct 2026, 08:40 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 294 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
柬埔寨APD银行拟关三家分行引发关注 柬埔寨亚太发展银行（APD Bank）宣布将于11月1日起关闭金边奥林匹亚、诺罗敦及毛泽东大道三家分行，仅保留万谷总行。记者实地走访发现，部分分行已开始搬迁整理。 该行自今年3月起实施提款限制，引发多名大额储户不满并前往总行讨要说法。昨天，亦有数十名储户在APD总部门前聚集，要求该行对限制提取存款等作出解释。 随着今年已有太子、恒合等6家银行启动清算及致富银行被接管，接连发生的金融风险使柬埔寨银行业面临严峻的信任考验。 ➡️ 投稿联系： 遥 路😀
#巴基斯坦资讯：卡拉奇突袭涉嫌诈骗呼叫中心，11人被捕 10月19日——巴基斯坦国家网络犯罪调查局（NCCIA）在卡拉奇沙拉费萨尔路（Shahrah-e-Faisal）突袭一处涉嫌从事跨国网络诈骗的呼叫中心，逮捕11名嫌疑人，其中包括负责人亚西尔·吉尔吉蒂（Yasir Gilgiti）。 调查人员称，涉案人员涉嫌冒充美国银行、金融机构及债务结算机构工作人员，骗取外国公民的银行账户和个人财务信息。执法人员现场查扣电脑及其他电子设备。 目前，案件仍在进一步调查中，执法部门正追查涉案人员的具体分工及相关诈骗活动规模。 ➡️ 投稿联系： 遥 路😀
#群友投稿：提醒一下在马来西亚的同胞和留学生，最近街头出现了一种专骗好心人的套路。骗子冒充刚落地的中国同胞，自称银行卡被冻结、家人急等用钱，请人帮忙中转一笔资金。 对方会拿出转账记录，说跨境到账有延迟，明天才能收到，让人先垫几千块应急。中国驻马来西亚大使馆也提醒过，骗子还会伪造到账短信，用优惠汇率做诱饵，专挑留学生和游客下手。 提醒大家陌生人求助，只要涉及代转账、换汇、资金中转，一律不帮；钱没有真正到账，一分不垫。别因为对方自称同胞，又说得着急，就轻信那些转账记录和到账短信。私下换汇还可能触犯外汇管理规定。 万一被骗，应尽快拨打马来西亚报警电话999，或国家诈骗应对中心997，保存好聊天记录和转账凭证，也可以联系中国驻马来西亚大使馆求助。 ➡️ 投稿联系： 遥 路😀
#网友投稿：缅甸“小勐拉”又要开始抓人了，这两天中国那边进来了好多警察，听说是带着名单来的，身上只要有案子的都抓，诈骗（开工）也抓。 昨天晚上勐拉三禾被包围了，警察过来围之前跑出去好几个，然后警察局的车在街上到处去搜捕， 这两天，好多身上有案子的都已经提前跑路了，我老板前几天看情况不对也跑去仰光了，还在勐拉的兄弟都注意点吧 ➡️ 投稿联系： 遥 路😀
七星海官方发声：一贯坚决抵制各类网络诈骗及违法犯罪行为！ 昨天，七星海特区（Dara Sakor）官方通过脸书账号发声，阐明支持反诈及打击各类违法犯罪的立场。 七星海一贯坚决抵制各类网络诈骗及违法犯罪行为，坚定支持并积极配合柬埔寨政府及相关主管部门推进反诈治理工作。 七星海将持续强化风险防控体系建设，全力配合有关部门开展调查与执法行动，携手维护片区及周边社区的安全秩序与各方合法权益。我们始终认为，唯有立足法治、恪守诚信，方能实现区域长期、健康、可持续的发展。 不久前，七星海特区内的长湾园区及背后实控人邓丕兵被半岛电视台暗访并曝光涉诈问题，引发外界普遍关注。 ➡️ 投稿联系： 遥 路😀
白鹿曼谷见面会紧急叫停！缅北电诈、游客失踪风波蔓延，“倾家荡产式”兜底赢一众好感 原本定在10月25日举办的WeSpark「林深时见鹿」海外见面会，今天官方突然一纸公告宣布：不办了！直接取消！ 要说取消的原因，官方虽然给足了体面，说是“鉴于近期相关风险提示，与平台审慎沟通后”作出的决定。但懂的都懂，最近泰国的风评可是急转直下啊！前有缅北电诈集团的恐怖阴影笼罩，后有各种中国游客在泰国失踪、被拐的新闻频上热搜，甚至连反诈主播都公开喊话千万别去。这谁顶得住！ 面对粉丝群体日益弥漫的恐慌情绪，主办方和艺人方终于坐不住了。毕竟追星归追星，这要是真出了安全问题，谁能担得起这个责任？这波紧急叫停，只能说：干得漂亮，保命要紧！ ➡️ 投稿联系： 遥 路😀
#网友投稿：上周在菲律宾帕赛市，“KE TOWER大楼”管理方将一具尸体藏匿起来，躲避菲律宾警方的搜查。 警方在现场停留了三天，一无所获。大楼管理方随后处理了遗体。 死者是一名来自越南的年轻人，被公司关押，绝望之下试图从窗户逃跑。 目前，“KE TOWER大楼仍在正常运营。 ➡️ 投稿联系： 遥 路😀
#小姐姐投稿：到底是有爱意才频繁聊天，还是频繁聊天才有爱意？ 回国以后才发现，原来距离真的会慢慢改变两个人的关系。我在国内，他还留在马来西亚。本来想着，暂时分开一段时间没什么，只要两个人心里有彼此，隔着屏幕也能好好谈恋爱。可最近不知道怎么了，他越来越少主动找我，消息经常发过去半天都没有回复。有时候我明明看见他在线，却迟迟等不到一句话。说不在意是假的，毕竟以前他不是这样的。 以前他忙起来，也会抽空告诉我一声，现在却连一句简单的解释都懒得给。 我不是非要他时时刻刻陪着我，也不是不懂他在马来西亚赚钱不容易。可再忙的人，真的连看一眼消息的时间都没有吗？有时候我甚至会怀疑，是不是我回国以后，他身边有了别的女人，所以才开始对我冷淡。以前总觉得自己不会胡思乱想，真到了这种时候才发现，女人的安全感，有时候真的会被一次次的已读不回消磨干净。 我也不知道是他真的变了，还是我离开以后，才发现自己在他心里没有想象中那么重要。 每次手机响起来，我都…
东帝汶今年逮捕448名涉诈人员，211人为中国籍 据有组织犯罪与腐败报道项目（OCCRP）报道，东帝汶今年已逮捕448名涉嫌网络诈骗的人员，其中包括211名中国人和181名印尼人。部分嫌疑人此前曾两次被捕、定罪，获释后仍继续从事诈骗活动。 在首都帝力的一次突击行动中，警方抓获18名外国人，但其中14人缴纳罚款后获释，另外4人被撤销指控。目前仍有53名嫌疑人被羁押候审。警方已查获62台星链终端及数百台电子设备。联合国毒品和犯罪问题办公室此前警告，东帝汶正面临网络诈骗产业扩张的风险。 ➡️ 投稿联系： 遥 路😀
#网友投稿：说一下尼泊尔的现状 2月份柬埔寨严查，我们来到尼泊尔，老板说有关系，来了后发现这个地方太穷了，移民局还拿钱不办事，由于超过了旅行签时间，工作签太贵公司不给办，只能先黑着 上个月有两个家里一起出来的老乡在路上被警察撞见了，要提供证件，发现已经过期了，当时我朋友就给他们赛钱，他们愣是不要，硬带进去警察局，接着公司开始找关系，最后要了300万卢比差不多2万美金，可是一直拖着不放人，钱收了不办事，问就说是在走流程，就一直关着，结果上个星期收到消息，要交罚款，并且驱逐出境，如果没钱交罚款就要先服刑再驱逐出境 问办事的官员就说先交钱需要再交300万卢比，于是公司又给了钱，给完钱第二天又说300万是一个人的，还需要再交300万，支付另一个人的，公司就有些犹豫了，让他们先处理一个人的，他们又说必须两个人一起交够了，一起办理，明摆着黑钱了，公司也不愿意拿钱了，奉劝还想来这里的狗推门来之前三思而后行 ➡️ 投稿联系： 遥 路😀
缅甸勐拉又有18名中国籍涉诈人员被移交中方！ 10月16日，勐拉方面经勐拉—打洛口岸，将18名中国籍涉诈人员移交给中方，相关涉案物品和证据也一并移交。 这已经不是今年第一次了。早在5月19日，勐拉方面就移交过5人；7月10日，又有40人被移交。算上这次，今年已知的这三批移交行动，涉及63名中国籍人员。 从5月的5人，到7月的40人，再到这次的18人，勐拉方面的相关打击行动仍在推进。至于这18人的具体涉案情况及后续处理结果，目前还没有更多详细信息公布。 ➡️ 投稿联系： 遥 路😀
第170次中老缅泰湄公河联合巡逻执法行动启动 今天上午，第170次中老缅泰湄公河联合巡逻执法行动启动仪式在云南西双版纳景哈警务码头举行。来自中国、老挝、缅甸、泰国四国有关执法部门，100余名执法队员齐聚码头参加仪式。 中方执法艇从景哈警务码头鸣笛启航，将前往预定水域，与老挝、缅甸执法艇会合，组成联合编队开展全线联合巡逻执法。此次行动在中方53107艇设立编队指挥所，由中老缅泰四方指挥长率代表团共同指挥行动。 本次行动采取分段巡航、全线联巡、水陆联动的模式开展，将对湄公河重点航道、险滩水域、沿岸码头及支流渡口开展巡逻管控，紧盯毒品贩运、非法偷渡、跨境走私等各类跨境违法犯罪，排查航道安全隐患，防范化解流域各类安全风险，保障沿岸各国群众、过往船舶及船员生命财产安全。 行动期间，四国执法部门将赴老挝召开多边信息交流会，各方互通流域治安动态，分析研判跨境犯罪新动向，围绕信息共享、案件协同处置、联合防控等内容磋商细化共治举措。 ➡…
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,043 posts we hold for @wx_533. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 50 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@wx_533 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚前线大事件曝光-头条新闻” (@wx_533), 25,046 subscribers as measured 20 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wx_533.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.