Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for カデメ–プル

Channel

カデメ–プル

@x1hhdw

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

24subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003756256886
TypeChannel
Username@x1hhdw
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 5 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/x1hhdw

Growth

202522.58 August 2026 — 20 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20 subscribers15 August 2026 — 25 subscribers6 September 2026 — 24 subscribers248 August 20266 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 29 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19–26 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 05:1924-1
15 Aug 2026, 12:5525+5
11 Aug 2026, 16:1620no change
8 Aug 2026, 10:4520first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
31s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

89 reactions across 9 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 8.99% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 540894289616021218788.99%
custom 525819365435432187577.87%
custom 525841165830433263977.87%
custom 529188028974265005577.87%
custom 523341992221373662066.74%
custom 523585543495851974266.74%
custom 525600034770023186566.74%
custom 528515274745946267066.74%
custom 529650272252515168566.74%
custom 525796638186488735644.49%
custom 525825126275066386144.49%
custom 532597636436332370144.49%
custom 543361729859214524044.49%
custom 525124946533079235833.37%
custom 525841888243932795633.37%
custom 528528313407665049633.37%
custom 534399463693329569733.37%
custom 526044883430725925922.25%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 89 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 14 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @x1hhdw. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 20:00 UTC76 views15 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026
Photo

#Results これが、七つの大罪だ。 伝説 Kore ga, Nanatsu no Taizai da.

custom 52581936543543218753custom 52358554349585197422custom 52851527474594626702custom 52852831340766504962custom 52918802897426500552custom 53439946369332956972custom 54336172985921452402

1 Aug 2026, 17:12 UTC73 views11 reactionsread 11 August 2026
File

🤍

custom 52851527474594626702custom 52918802897426500552custom 54089428961602121872custom 52358554349585197421custom 52512494653307923581custom 52581936543543218751custom 52852831340766504961custom 53439946369332956971

29 Jul 2026, 13:00 UTC160 views21 reactionsread 11 August 2026
File

Just me and my twins💗

custom 54089428961602121874custom 52358554349585197423custom 52581936543543218753custom 52918802897426500553custom 52512494653307923582custom 52604488343072592592custom 52851527474594626702custom 54336172985921452402

24 Jul 2026, 09:49 UTC73 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @RamislkaPhoto

«🌟» My fav

custom 52334199222137366201custom 52560003477002318651custom 52582512627506638611custom 52584116583043326391custom 52584188824393279561custom 52965027225251516851custom 53259763643633237011

21 Jul 2026, 21:01 UTC104 views10 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🔤 could be your Tommy 💕💕 🎀🔤ou could be my Pusheen 😇

custom 52560003477002318652custom 52965027225251516852custom 52334199222137366201custom 52579663818648873561custom 52584116583043326391custom 52584188824393279561custom 53259763643633237011custom 54089428961602121871

19 Jul 2026, 22:27 UTC122 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

( 愛 , 102 Day's) – With Ramil🌟

custom 52584116583043326392custom 52334199222137366201custom 52560003477002318651custom 52579663818648873561custom 52582512627506638611custom 52965027225251516851custom 53259763643633237011

19 Jul 2026, 22:26 UTC74 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @RamislkaPhoto

🎀

custom 52334199222137366201custom 52560003477002318651custom 52579663818648873561custom 52582512627506638611custom 52584116583043326391custom 52584188824393279561custom 52965027225251516851

19 Jul 2026, 10:37 UTC98 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

ˏˋ 🖤 * 🔤appy 🔤irthday 🔤ay🫐

custom 52334199222137366202custom 52584116583043326392custom 52560003477002318651custom 52579663818648873561custom 52582512627506638611custom 52965027225251516851custom 53259763643633237011

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @x1hhdw. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“カデメ–プル” (@x1hhdw), 24 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/x1hhdw.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.