Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
30 measurements spanning 42 days, net +309. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,389–10,795 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 05:18
10,748
+12
15 Sept 2026, 04:41
10,736
+13
13 Sept 2026, 10:17
10,723
+19
11 Sept 2026, 12:41
10,704
+47
8 Sept 2026, 17:02
10,657
+18
5 Sept 2026, 12:16
10,639
+3
3 Sept 2026, 16:17
10,636
+5
2 Sept 2026, 06:04
10,631
+109
1 Sept 2026, 04:34
10,522
+3
30 Aug 2026, 07:09
10,519
+3
29 Aug 2026, 05:24
10,516
+5
28 Aug 2026, 05:23
10,511
+8
27 Aug 2026, 01:54
10,503
+13
26 Aug 2026, 02:12
10,490
+16
25 Aug 2026, 04:57
10,474
-9
24 Aug 2026, 04:23
10,483
+3
22 Aug 2026, 09:07
10,480
+5
20 Aug 2026, 22:43
10,475
+6
19 Aug 2026, 20:08
10,469
+4
18 Aug 2026, 19:36
10,465
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.8%
avg views ÷ 10,748 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,480
1 post measured
Reaction rate
1.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 8 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026
Posts held
8 (15 July 2026 – 24 August 2026)
Views total
1,480
Reactions total
20
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Aug 2026, 13:29 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 44s
Average length
1m 44s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
244 reactions across 8 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
70
28.7%
❤
63
25.8%
custom 5442764526665629104
42
17.2%
👍
17
6.97%
custom 5260549594240012674
14
5.74%
🎉
10
4.10%
🤔
10
4.10%
👎
9
3.69%
😁
9
3.69%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 244 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Интернет строился для людей,
а теперь его всё чаще читают машины
В новой статье на Хабре разбираемся, как ИИ меняет поисковую выдачу и для чего сайты начинают делать отдельный слой для моделей — llms.txt. Остаётся главный вопрос: кому доверять — оригиналу или пересказу?
Рекомендуем к прочтению всем, кто работает с контентом, документацией или ИИ-инструментами и хочет понять, куда движется сеть.
🔗 ссылка на статью
Привет!
На связи Лёша Никулин, я продакт привлечения в команде Подбора Сферы Х5
Сегодня поделюсь, как мы запустили новый карьерный сайт и Личный кабинет кандидата.
Спойлер – теперь путь кандидата становится проще и понятнее. Ведь узнать больше об X5, посмотреть возможности, оставить отклик или зарегистрироваться теперь можно в одном месте.
А ещё в личном кабинете кандидат может следить за статусом, подключаться к…
В X5 Tech прошёл летний День Донора 🩸
91 участник, 40+ литров плазмы и компонентов крови — и каждый литр уже кому-то помогает. Например, тромбоциты одного из наших коллег уже пошли на помощь пациенту.
Именно такие моменты помогают осознать, насколько важен вклад каждого донора.
Спасибо всем, кто был в этот день с нами! 🫶
Друзья, Митап MoscowPython & X5 Tech, который должен был пройти 29 июля, перенесён. О новой дате сообщим позднее.
Надеемся на скорую встречу — следите за нашими обновлениями.
Суперстажёрская игра завершена
Все 12 концовок открыты, любимые истории выбраны — спасибо, что были в игре 💜
20 победителей получают сертификат «Пятёрочки» на 2000 ₽:
Ренат Ким
Даша
киро4ка
jlast1o
ксюшенька 🧸🧺
Maria
Λенα Δ
Александр Шавалиев
Artem
Вера Потехина
Ксюша Мануйлова
Данателло Тарт
Дмитрий Николаев
bella
Michael С
Сергей
Давид
sonich
Юлиус
Кубик
Поздравляем победителей 🎉
Делитесь своими любимыми…
Раздали стиля хлеба и зрелищ на ITMO Family Day
11 июля X5 Tech приехал в Парк 300-летия Санкт-Петербурга, чтобы поучаствовать в большом летнем фестивале для выпускников, будущих студентов и их родителей.
Несмотря на дождь мы:
• поймали дзен на сапах;
• провели мастер-классы по плетению авосек;
• успели сделать памятные снимки на фотозоне
• рассказали гостям, как ритейл изменился за 20 лет.
А в конце дня разыграл…
Ненастоящие бабушки и пельмени, сделанные с любовью
Так мы проверяли участников митапа — смогут ли они отличить ИИ-контент от человеческого. Оказалось, что это не так очевидно 👀
Делись в комментариях: ты легко опознаёшь ИИ-контент в медиа?
Бэкенд собрался за день…
а интерфейс пилишь уже неделю
В новой статье на Хабре Василий Рассказов, начальник отдела новых ИИ-решений в X5 Tech, разбирает, почему фронт в среднем в 6 раз тяжелее бэка — и что это значит, если строишь продукт с AI-ассистентом через specification-driven development.
Смотрим на состояния компонентов, обработку ошибок, дизайн-систему и локализацию — и на то, почему AI пишет интерфейс хуже…
👍7🔥6👎5🤔3custom 54427645266656291043❤1😁1
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @x5_tech. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
AvitoTech @avitotech · 25,625 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 September 2026
Перекрёсток @perekrestok_store · 132,750 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 15 August 2026
Ozon Tech @ozon_tech · 29,730 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 8 September 2026
МТС Банк | Карьера @mtsbankcareer · 30,304 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 7 September 2026
Код Желтый @kod_zheltyi · 33,061 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 September 2026
T-Crew @t_crew · 43,300 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 29 August 2026
VK Team @vkjobs · 25,707 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 September 2026
Ozon Team @ozonteam · 22,823 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 September 2026
Avito Career @avito_career · 66,216 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 21 August 2026
Карьера в Альфа-Банке @alfabank_career · 25,047 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 15 September 2026
Alfa Digital @alfadigital_jobs · 54,393 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 24 August 2026
Злой коллега @zloy_kollega · 45,064 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 28 August 2026
Карьера в ВТБ @vtb_career · 89,485 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 August 2026
Yandex for Developers @Yandex4Developers · 28,505 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
2ГИС Команда @team2gis · 44,850 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 August 2026
Карьера в Сбере! @careersber · 136,237 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“X5 Tech” (@x5_tech), 10,748 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/x5_tech.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.