Posted without readable text
👏3💋3🌭2🎉2😢1

Channel
@x_winline
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
27,188subscribers
-21 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002240871559 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @x_winline |
| Description | Winline news. |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 21 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/x_winline |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 05:59 | 27,188 | -1 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 10:38 | 27,189 | -1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 06:40 | 27,190 | -2 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 23:36 | 27,192 | -1 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 09:39 | 27,193 | -1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:38 | 27,194 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:39 | 27,195 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:53 | 27,196 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:11 | 27,197 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 27,200 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:14 | 27,201 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:04 | 27,202 | -1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 17:27 | 27,203 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 12:34 | 27,204 | -1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 15:47 | 27,205 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:55 | 27,206 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 03:55 | 27,207 | +1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 27,206 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:31 | 27,207 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 27,209 | first reading |
199 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 199 (2 August 2026 – 19 September 2026) |
| Views total | 212,626 |
| Reactions total | 3,451 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 19 Sept 2026, 16:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 46 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
7,421 reactions across 199 posts, in 60 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1,688 | 22.7% | |
| ❤ | 802 | 10.8% | |
| 🎉 | 688 | 9.27% | |
| 🔥 | 617 | 8.31% | |
| 🤔 | 584 | 7.87% | |
| 👏 | 267 | 3.60% | |
| 🗿 | 263 | 3.54% | |
| ⚡ | 251 | 3.38% | |
| 😁 | 240 | 3.23% | |
| 😢 | 197 | 2.65% | |
| 🤩 | 186 | 2.51% | |
| 🤯 | 173 | 2.33% | |
| 👎 | 172 | 2.32% | |
| 🥰 | 91 | 1.23% | |
| 🤣 | 89 | 1.20% | |
| 🫡 | 89 | 1.20% | |
| 😱 | 87 | 1.17% | |
| 🤬 | 74 | 0.997% | |
| 👀 | 70 | 0.943% | |
| 😈 | 68 | 0.916% | |
| 40 further kinds | 725 | 9.77% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 199 of the 199 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,421 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 199 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 19 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Posted without readable text
👏3💋3🌭2🎉2😢1
🗿 188,000 accounts in CS have been banned, even though their owners had previously reported cheaters. The top three countries with the highest percentage of such users are Russia at 40%, followed by the USA and Turkey at 28% each. ✅
🤬9👎4🤔2😱1
💃 Ammar The Dancer — Ammar is getting the hang of social media 😁 — how did he agree to this?
😁12❤5🎉2👍2
🕹️ Updated predictions for the CS2 Major — s1mple's team has less than a 10% chance of qualifying. Analyst Mischief conducted match simulations and calculated the approximate chances for European teams to receive invites to the main tournament. ➡️ Magic has nearly an 80% chance of getting an invitation. ➡️ s1mple's team has a 9.4% chance. ➡️ Virtus Pro has a 29% chance of qualifying for the Major.
👎14🤔5🤯2😢2👏1
📱 Valve has disabled online tracking for CS2 servers ➡️ The company has turned off the API that allowed third-party websites to track the number of players on official servers and by region in real time. ➡️ The overall online player count for CS2 on Steam continues to function — only the detailed statistics for individual servers are no longer available. Valve has not yet revealed the reason for this decision 🤔
🤔15👍3
⚡️ RGB lighting is causing your PC to lag in games! Actually, it’s not the lighting itself, but poorly optimized drivers. If you experience stuttering in a game despite having a normal average FPS, the culprit could be the proprietary Gigabyte Control Center (GCC) utility, specifically the dynamic GPU lighting synchronization (non-static GPU Sync). This was identified during tests in CS2. How to fix it: ➡️ Switch …
⚡29👍13🤔2
🅱️ FACEIT has recognized five young talents in CS2 The platform has named five players aged 18 and under who currently hold the highest rankings in the FACEIT leaderboard for their age group. ➡️ During the five-day Challenger Queue event, tired73 took first place in Europe. He was awarded the title of Best Young Talent & Upcomer and received $5,000.
🎉17👍4
🕹️ The captain of NAVI commented on the risk of missing the major after the team finished last in the tournament. Currently, the team has a 62.7% chance of qualifying for the major. ➡️ NAVI is currently the only organization that has attended every major in Counter-Strike.
🤔31👍11🤯5😢5👏2
🕹️ DRAW IN HONOR OF THE START 🏆🏆🏆🎁 STAR SERIES S4 ⤵️ The first tournament of this gaming season is about to begin, and to celebrate, we have prepared an exciting prize draw for you! 🎉 As promised, we have gathered the best prizes for you: 🏆 1. Dragonclaw Hook + 10,000 Freebet 🏆 2. Lunacy Headphones + 10,000 Freebet 🏆 3. WINLINE Pubstomp 2026 Sweatshirt + 10,000 Freebet 🅱️ 4. WINLINE Pubstomp 2026 T-shirt + 10,000 …
🎉24❤7👍4🔥3🤩2
🕹️ ATF can't find a game in Dota: Ammar shared that he has been searching for a match for 5 hours. Ammar mentioned that he has been looking for a match for about five hours, but the game still hasn't found him any opponents ❌ The Dota player even asked for help with this issue, joking that it seems like the game is deliberately preventing him from playing or winning. However, he has no intention of giving up.
🤨14👍3🤣2
Photo, posted without a caption
🤗8👌5🤷5👀2😴2
⚡️ GET YOUR CHANCE TO GO TO THE PGL MAJOR SINGAPORE THANKS TO NEXT GEN The first participant of the program has already taken advantage of its opportunities: ssscarfaccce attended 🕹️ The International 2026, where he not only created a ton of content for his channel but also got to know players and other streamers better. Now you can become a participant too ✅ 👍👍👍👍 in collaboration with the project, they will be giv…
🤝15👍4🎉2
Showing the 12 most recent of 199 posts we hold for @x_winline. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@x_winline edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Winline” (@x_winline), 27,188 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/x_winline.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.