Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 西安天上人间报告

Channel

西安天上人间报告

@xatsrjb

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,424subscribers

+48 since we began measuring on 24 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003796726994
TypeChannel
Username@xatsrjb
Created1 August 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded24 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/xatsrjb

Growth

3,3763,4243,40024 August 2026 — 3,376 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,378 subscribers27 August 2026 — 3,390 subscribers30 August 2026 — 3,400 subscribers2 September 2026 — 3,403 subscribers6 September 2026 — 3,424 subscribers24 August 20266 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 13 days, net +48. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,369–3,431 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 08:023,424+21
2 Sept 2026, 01:163,403+3
30 Aug 2026, 05:573,400+10
27 Aug 2026, 13:423,390+12
24 Aug 2026, 23:123,378+2
24 Aug 2026, 07:153,376first reading

Engagement

4 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.394%
avg views ÷ 3,424 subscribers
Avg views / post
13.5
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 4 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026
Posts held4 (1 August 202624 August 2026)
Views total27
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Aug 2026, 07:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

24 Aug 2026, 06:28 UTC4 viewsread 24 August 2026

【天上人间工兵认证报告】 【妹子艺名】:#一玥 【联系方式】:@rryiyue 【验证留名】:克拉克 【验证时间】:2026.8.23 22:30 【所在位置】:莲湖区 【修车水费】:p600/pp1100 【是否代聊】:是 【身高身材】:152cm,82斤 【妹子年龄】:18 【湿度紧度】:紧 【颜值相似】:没有太大差别 【颜值分值】:9分 【凶器罩杯】:c罩杯 【环境卫生】:非常干净,没有任何外卖垃圾,独立小房间 【服务内容】:陪洗,kiss亲亲,口,👅蛋 【机车行为】:无 【优点】:干净整洁,态度好,服务好 【缺点】:呆 【性价比】:8分 【推荐程度】:8分 【个人发挥】:感谢天上人间工兵福利 房间干净整洁,一次性用品齐全,老师陪洗认真,陪洗把我全身上下几乎都用沐浴露打了一遍。洗澡完后,老师也自己清洗一边。 到了床边,开始认真服务,口的很认真,硬了以后,本来想女上,因为还想玩会奈子,但是老师不太会女上,后来转传教士,

23 Aug 2026, 15:48 UTC23 viewsread 24 August 2026

【天上人间工兵认证报告】 【妹子艺名】:#王妃儿 【联系方式】:@wangfeier688 【验证留名】:哈基鼠 【验证时间】:2026.8.23 20:00 【所在位置】:未央区 【修车水费】:p600/pp1100 【是否代聊】:是 【身高身材】:170cm,105斤 【妹子年龄】:22 【湿度紧度】:中等偏上 【颜值相似】:没有太大差别 【颜值分值】:9分 【凶器罩杯】:b罩杯 【环境卫生】:非常干净,没有任何外卖垃圾,烟灰缸没有烟把,床上有一次性床垫 【服务内容】:陪洗,kiss亲亲,口,👅蛋 【机车行为】:无 【优点】:干净整洁,态度好,服务好 【缺点】:话比较少 【性价比】:8分 【推荐程度】:8分 【个人发挥】:感谢天上人间工兵福利,我将会用最客观,最真实,最不绕弯子的话完成此次车评😃 酒店房间干净整洁,一次性用品齐全,老师有轻微洁癖,陪洗把我全身上下几乎都用沐浴露打了一遍,下面洗了两遍,加上我自己刚开始洗

Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @xatsrjb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“西安天上人间报告” (@xatsrjb), 3,424 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xatsrjb.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.