Channel
@xauhqresults
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
33subscribers
+26 since we began measuring on 29 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003882969959 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xauhqresults |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 18 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 29 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xauhqresults |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 17:20 | 33 | +12 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 16:01 | 21 | +13 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 8 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 12:30 | 7 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (18 July 2026 – 29 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🏛️ X A U H Q | E X E C U T I V E AUGUST 2026 | MONTHLY PERFORMANCE SUMMARY ━━━━━━━━━━━━━ [ STATUS: CHALLENGING BUT PROFITABLE ] ⚔️ 💰 TOTAL GAINS: +3,643 PIPS 🛡️ TOTAL LOSSES: -708 PIPS 👑 NET RESULT: +2,935 PIPS 🎯 WIN RR: 1 : 41.3 🛡️ LOSS RR: 1 : 8.0 🏆 NET RR: 1 : 33.3 📊 23 TRADES • 14 WINNING • 9 LOSING • 0 ACTIVE ━━━━━━━━━━━━━ THE HEADQUARTERS VERDICT August was challenging from the start, with Week 1 closing n…
❤1
🏛️ X A U H Q | E X E C U T I V E JULY 2026 | FINAL PERFORMANCE SUMMARY ━━━━━━━━━━━━━ [ STATUS: CONSISTENT EXECUTION ] ⚔️ 💰 TOTAL GAINS: +9,167 PIPS 🛡️ TOTAL LOSSES: -935 PIPS 👑 NET PROFIT: +8,232 PIPS 🎯 WIN RR: 1 : 92.3 🛡️ LOSS RR: 1 : 9.3 🏆 NET RR: 1 : 83.0 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━ THE HEADQUARTERS VERDICT July wasn't about chasing every move—it was about executing only when the probability was on our side. Despite a r…
🏛️ X A U H Q | E X E C U T I V E JULY 2026 | WEEK 3 PERFORMANCE SUMMARY ━━━━━━━━━━━━━ [ STATUS: SELECTIVE EXECUTION ] ⚔️ 💰 TOTAL GAINS: +6,254 PIPS 🛡️ TOTAL LOSSES: -760 PIPS 👑 NET PROFIT: +5,494 PIPS 🎯 WIN RR: 1 : 66.5 🛡️ LOSS RR: 1 : 6.8 🏆 NET RR: 1 : 59.7 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━ THE HEADQUARTERS VERDICT This week rewarded patience over aggression. Several setups were intentionally skipped due to a lack of confirmati…
🏛️ X A U H Q | E X E C U T I V E JULY 2026 | PERFORMANCE SUMMARY ━━━━━━━━━━━━━ [ STATUS: MARKET DOMINATION ] 📈🔥 💰 TOTAL GAINS: +5,564 PIPS 🛡️ TOTAL LOSSES: -620 PIPS 👑 NET PROFIT: +4,944 PIPS 🎯 WIN RR: 1 : 60.3 🛡️ LOSS RR: 1 : 5.5 🏆 NET RR: 1 : 54.8 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━ THE HEADQUARTERS VERDICT Despite the FOMC Minutes, U.S. ISM PMI, Unemployment Claims, and other major macroeconomic events, disciplined execution and…
🏛️ X A U H Q | E X E C U T I V E JULY 2026 | WEEK 1 PERFORMANCE SUMMARY ━━━━━━━━━━━━━ [ STATUS: MARKET DOMINATION ] 📈🔥 PERFORMANCE SUMMARY ━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 💰 TOTAL GAINS: +3,182 PIPS 🛡️ TOTAL LOSSES: -370 PIPS 👑 NET PROFIT: +2,812 PIPS 🎯 WIN RR: 1 : 37.3 🛡️ LOSS RR: 1 : 4.0 🏆 NET RR: 1 : 33.3 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━ THE HEADQUARTERS VERDICT Despite high-impact events including U.S. NFP, Unemployment Data, and major macroe…
🏛️ X A U H Q | E X E C U T I V E JUNE 2026 | WEEK 4 PERFORMANCE SUMMARY ━━━━━━━━━━━━━ [ STATUS: MARKET DOMINATION ] 📈🔥 I. THE EXECUTION LOG (PIPS) ━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🔹 Trade 01: +265 Pips ✅ 🔹 Trade 02: +110 Pips ✅ 🔹 Trade 03: +240 Pips ✅ 🔹 Trade 04: +700 Pips ✅ 🔹 Trade 05: +550 Pips ✅ 🔹 Trade 06: +100 Pips ✅ 🔹 Trade 07: +100 Pips ✅ 🔻 Trade 08: -240 Pips ❌ 🔹 Trade 09: +130 Pips ✅ 🔻 Trade 10: -80 Pips ❌ 🔹 Trade 11: +1,120…
🏛️ X A U H Q | E X E C U T I V E MAY 01 — MAY 31, 2026 | MONTHLY PERFORMANCE SUMMARY ━━━━━━━━━━━━━ [ STATUS: MARKET DOMINATION ] 📉🔥 I. THE REVENUE (PIPS) ━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 💰 GAINS: + 5,892 🛡 LOSSES: - 233 👑 RESULT: + 5,659 PIPS ━━━━━━━━━━━━━ II. THE EFFICIENCY (RR) ━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🎯 WIN RR: 1 : 49.00 🛡️ LOSS RR: 1 : 2.00 🏆 NET RR: + 1 : 47.00 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━ III. THE HEADQUARTERS VERDICT May Month concluded. Despite ong…
🏛️ X A U H Q | E X E C U T I V E APRIL 01 — APRIL 30, 2026 | MONTHLY PERFORMANCE SUMMARY ━━━━━━━━━━━━━ [ STATUS: MARKET DOMINATION ] 📉🔥 I. THE REVENUE (PIPS) ━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 💰 GAINS: + 8,638 🛡 LOSSES: - 680 👑 RESULT: + 7,958 PIPS ━━━━━━━━━━━━━ II. THE EFFICIENCY (RR) ━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🎯 WIN RR: 1 : 72.00 🛡️ LOSS RR: 1 : 5.66 🏆 NET RR: + 1 : 66.33 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━ III. THE HEADQUARTERS VERDICT April Month concluded. Despi…
🏛️ X A U H Q | E X E C U T I V E MARCH 01 — MARCH 31, 2026 | MONTHLY PERFORMANCE SUMMARY ━━━━━━━━━━━━━ [ STATUS: MARKET DOMINATION ] 📉🔥 I. THE REVENUE (PIPS) ━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 💰 GAINS: + 15,080 🛡 LOSSES: - 1,195 👑 RESULT: + 13,885 PIPS ━━━━━━━━━━━━━ II. THE EFFICIENCY (RR) ━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🎯 WIN RR: 1 : 125.66 🛡️ LOSS RR: 1 : 9.95 🏆 NET RR: + 1 : 115.71 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━ III. THE HEADQUARTERS VERDICT March Week 4 conclud…
🏛️ X A U H Q | E X E C U T I V E FEB 01 — FEB 28, 2026 MONTHLY PERFORMANCE SUMMARY ━━━━━━━━━━━━━ [ STATUS: MARKET DOMINATION ] 📉🔥 I. THE REVENUE (PIPS) ━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 💰 GAINS: + 14152 🛡 LOSSES: - 2157 👑 RESULT: + 11,995 PIPS ━━━━━━━━━━━━━ II. THE EFFICIENCY (RR) ━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🎯 WIN RR: 1 : 117.93 🛡️ LOSS RR: 1 : 17.97 🏆 NET RR: + 1 : 99.96 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━ III. THE HEADQUARTERS VERDICT February 2026 concluded. 28 …
⭐️VIP TRADES: JANUARY 2026 PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS ⭐️ 📅01/01/2026 – 31/01/2026 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ✅Green Pips +12,178 🎯 ✅Red Pips -1358 😏 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ✅️Net Pips : +10,820 👑 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ✅Green RR +1:175 ⚡ ✅Red RR -1:20 😶 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ✅️ Net RR : +1:155 👑 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🔥 January 2026 trading has officially closed with a massive performance! The full month delivered +10,820 net pips …
⭐️VIP TRADES: DECEMBER 2025 PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS ⭐️ 📅01/12/2025 – 31/12/2025 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ✅Green Pips +3255 🎯 ✅Red Pips -363😏 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ✅️Net Pips : +2892 👑 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ✅Green RR +1:55⚡ ✅Red RR -1:6 😶 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ✅️ Net RR : +1:49 👑 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Quality Triumphs Over Quantity! ✨ Our Free Premium VIP Program delivers authentic, crystal-clear, and jaw-dropping results, …
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @xauhqresults. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“XAUHQ RESULTS” (@xauhqresults), 33 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xauhqresults.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.