Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 深圳 豆豆 小纯 朋友圈

Channel

深圳 豆豆 小纯 朋友圈

@xc2601

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,102subscribers

+4,100 since we began measuring on 2 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004413864392
TypeChannel
Username@xc2601
Created1 September 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded2 September 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/xc2601

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

24,7872,394.52 September 2026 — 2 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,634 subscribers8 September 2026 — 2,031 subscribers12 September 2026 — 4,787 subscribers16 September 2026 — 4,102 subscribers4,1022 September 202616 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 14 days, net +4,100. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 19:364,102-685
12 Sept 2026, 20:184,787+2,756
8 Sept 2026, 21:372,031+397
3 Sept 2026, 12:371,634+1,632
2 Sept 2026, 07:452first reading

Engagement

4 posts held, back to 1 September 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.195%
avg views ÷ 4,102 subscribers
Avg views / post
8.0
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
4
of 4 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held4 (1 September 20262 September 2026)
Views total24
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 07:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 05:54 UTC14 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

❤️【深圳甜妹】小纯大长腿 @Dd10012007 新人下海 模特兼职 🌻【个人简介】 🌹【尽身高168体重:🌹90斤 年龄:🌹18】【纯天然无人工,】【人照合一】【态度主动热情、皮肤白净细腻-线天,毛少水多B紧、三点粉嫩 🌷【服务内容:】【陪洗】【Ksii】【无套吹口活一流,】【制服诱惑】【各种姿势配合】【热情主动态度好】【角色扮演】 🌹(加米可以有jk制服) 🌹【课费】【一课40分钟-1000】 🌷【二课90分钟-2000】 【自带豪华工作室】【方便进出,有停车场】 朋友圈: https://t.me/xc2601 双向: @xiaochun862Bot

Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @xc2601. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“深圳 豆豆 小纯 朋友圈” (@xc2601), 4,102 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xc2601.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.