Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 小洁的频道!

Channel

小洁的频道!

@xiaojiedepindao

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

288subscribers

+281 since we began measuring on 10 October 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004335600949
TypeChannel
Username@xiaojiedepindao
Created9 October 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded10 October 2026
Last confirmed live29 October 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/xiaojiedepindao

Topic

Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 29 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7288147.510 October 2026 — 7 subscribers10 October 2026 — 7 subscribers13 October 2026 — 144 subscribers21 October 2026 — 205 subscribers29 October 2026 — 288 subscribers10 October 202629 October 2026
5 measurements spanning 19 days, net +281. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Oct 2026, 15:49288+83
21 Oct 2026, 14:48205+61
13 Oct 2026, 18:51144+137
10 Oct 2026, 14:227no change
10 Oct 2026, 13:477first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 9 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.8%
avg views ÷ 288 subscribers
Avg views / post
83.0
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
6
of 6 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 October 2026
Posts held6 (9 October 2026 – 10 October 2026)
Views total332
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Oct 2026, 14:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 6 posts held from the last 30 days (16.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Oct 2026, 05:40 UTC98 viewsread 10 October 2026
Photo

小洁: 身高/体重163cm/108斤 三围94c-62-96 年龄04 洪山欢乐谷 邻家小妹,长相甜美纯欲嘞,身材高挑比例非常赞哦,喜好运动,🐺🐺🐺🐺🐺🐺配合度高,待哥哥来解锁新体验。 茶水费: 500—次45分钟 900俩次90分钟q 可提供课室,也可外出上门。 服务流程:细腻口活可亲可摸陪浴调情胸推漫游丝袜高跟制服诱惑爱爱姿势高度配合解锁。 联系方式 @xiaojiedeh

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @xiaojiedepindao. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“小洁的频道!” (@xiaojiedepindao), 288 subscribers as measured 29 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xiaojiedepindao.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.