Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 小茉莉的小屋

Channel

小茉莉的小屋

@xiaomoli_yu

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,183subscribers

+1,979 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004303711028
TypeChannel
Username@xiaomoli_yu
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 6 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/xiaomoli_yu

Growth

2047,6383,9217 August 2026 — 204 subscribers7 August 2026 — 265 subscribers8 August 2026 — 265 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,638 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,317 subscribers21 August 2026 — 6,993 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,283 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,265 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,241 subscribers2 September 2026 — 2,221 subscribers7 September 2026 — 2,183 subscribers2,1837 August 20267 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 31 days, net +1,979. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 12:152,183-38
2 Sept 2026, 06:442,221-20
30 Aug 2026, 09:132,241-24
27 Aug 2026, 14:342,265-18
24 Aug 2026, 07:352,283-4,710
21 Aug 2026, 01:356,993-324
17 Aug 2026, 21:527,317-321
14 Aug 2026, 22:337,638+7,373
8 Aug 2026, 09:01265no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:56265+61
7 Aug 2026, 12:57204first reading

Engagement

41 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.8%
avg views ÷ 2,183 subscribers
Avg views / post
716
33 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.448%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
33
of 41 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 33 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held41 (6 August 202620 August 2026)
Views total23,643
Reactions total37
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 11:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 13s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

41 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1843.9%
👍1536.6%
❤‍🔥512.2%
🥰24.88%
👏12.44%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 07:34 UTC336 views1 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

这两天都🈵课啦周末还有一个空位可以约我闺蜜呢 @xevip520 我推介的靠谱哒🤩

👍1

19 Aug 2026, 11:06 UTC825 viewsread 20 August 2026

🥷 报告发布:Sehaj 💎 积分等级:VIP 0 —————————————— 🌸 老师:小茉莉 📞 联系:@xiaomoli5 📩 历史评价:https://t.me/xcdd_ss/26009 💰 水费:13 💃 颜值身材:萝莉身材,b胸,胸上粉嫩红宝石,腿细长比例很好 🏡 课室环境:干净舒适 ⚖️ 优点缺点:优点是活泼可爱身体柔。缺点无 🌟 推荐:满分 📝 过程描述:小茉莉家在步梯房,爬起来费劲,等我爬上去已经满头大汗,刚进去小茉莉就把水递到我嘴边,一边给我擦汗一边喂我喝水,属实把我感动一番。h部分妹妹全程配合,把家里每个角落都洒满了汗水,也把小茉莉累的够呛。走的时候,小茉莉一脸萌萌的送我到门口,我又抓着她的嘴亲了三下。“重要的话说三次,重要的人亲三下”,出门时候,小茉莉又给我塞了一包小饼干。路上吃着饼干回味着她的香味,常言道吃人嘴短,那吃了她的,喝了她的,最后还亲了她,这感觉大概是心软吧。 ————————————

19 Aug 2026, 10:56 UTC512 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

小茉莉 @xiaomoli5 163 40kg 萝莉属性,萝莉身材,乳头太粉了。 几个兄弟强推的妹妹。 情绪价值可以用夸张来形容,夸夸贴贴,蹲式服务,让我特别不好意思。 一点点小抽象。 主动式服务,舌吻,到处亲亲,口活力度大,让我几乎要爆炸。 女上坐上来,几下就把我秒了。 情绪价值 爆炸的萝莉,所有人都会喜欢的!

19 Aug 2026, 10:55 UTC601 viewsread 20 August 2026

【体验评分】:10 【人照几成】:10 【验证留名】:PandoraL 【验证时间】:2026.8.17 【妹子艺名】:小茉莉 【联系方式】@xiaomoli5 【上课水费】:13p 【位置环境】:静安老小区,很安全 【罩杯手感】:B,见过的最粉的 【颜值描述】:人照9.9分,图片和视频即是本人,嫩妹中的顶颜 【身材描述】:身高165左右,小骨架,很瘦,比例很好,有胸,皮肤白暂 【服务类型】: 情绪价值拉满,课表上有的都有,没有的就没有 【服务态度】:细心周到,无可挑剔 【屌感紧度】:很好 【个人总结】:估计是全网最宝藏的女孩了,至少目前是我心中的NO.1。颜值拉满,情绪拉满,性格阳光,又会聊天,待人细心周到,服务非常用心。妹妹是那种很容易让人心生保护欲的女孩子,能感受到妹妹的真诚。期待下一次相聚

19 Aug 2026, 10:55 UTC669 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

🎰 静安颜值嫩妹【小茉莉】@xiaomoli5 福利🧧 📮 参与条件 🪪 必须设置用户名 🎫 加入-上海艺术展览会备用群 🎫 加入-小茉莉的小屋 🎫 加入-上海艺术展览会交流群 └ 🎟️ 发言数大于 12 条 └ 🔑 发送口令﹝颜值嫩妹小茉莉﹞ 🎫 加入-上海艺术展览会榜单 🎫 加入-上海艺术展览会人气推荐榜 🎫 加入-上海艺术展览会报告区2.0 🎁 奖品名单 💰️ 现金红包🧧100 × 1 📜 抽奖说明 中奖者截图发给老师兑换 @xiaomoli5 开奖后(红包🧧24小时内领取过后作废) ‼️禁止刷屏乱性发言违规踢出 ‼️禁止刷屏乱性发言违规踢出 ‼️禁止刷屏乱性发言违规踢出 ‼️禁止刷屏乱性发言违规踢出 点击查看【小茉莉】个人资料:⬇️ https://t.me/yishuzanlanhui/31885 📆 开奖时间 • 北京时间 2026-08-25 21:23

19 Aug 2026, 04:47 UTC671 viewsread 20 August 2026

19号周三🈵 20号周四 6.30有p位其余时间🈵 21号周五3.30-7点空 22号周六7.30-11点空 约课请提前两天哇哥哥们🤩 约好的课请尽量不要迟到哇,最好提前过来找一下位置我发的地址导航可以直接到哒🤩 约课最好提前两天谢谢哥哥们的喜欢🤩

18 Aug 2026, 16:57 UTC844 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

谢谢哥哥们的投喂🤩太幸福啦遇到的哥哥都是特别好的人🤩都是我喜欢吃的🤩太懂我啦🤩真的是有心了🤩哥哥的重视比礼物🎁重要

18 Aug 2026, 16:21 UTC781 viewsread 20 August 2026

上海艺术展览会报告模板: https://t.me/+nFnE0wANtSRkMjEx 【体验评分】:10 【人照几成】:9.8 【验证留名】:alex 【验证时间】:2026.08.18 【妹子艺名】:小茉莉 【联系方式】:@xiaomoli5 【上课水费】:13p 【位置环境】:在小区,环境房间干净整洁,很温馨 【罩杯手感】:b,柔软 【身材描述】:1米65左右,照片差不多偏瘦,长相可爱,没有纹身,漫画腿 【服务类型】:帮忙洗,全程热心服务,69,蛇吻 【服务态度】:非常主动热情 【屌感紧度】:正常 【个人总结】:刚进门,小姐姐穿了一身可爱的衣服袜子,简直像漫画女主。进来之后,递一瓶水,带到沙发旁聊天,声音甜美可爱,小姐姐坐在我身上,香喷喷,简单几句关心,一天的烦恼烟消云散。 房间也是干净整洁,帮忙简单清洗后,回到房间让我挑衣服,好多可爱的衣服眼花缭乱。第一次过程体验非常好,69,蛇吻,身材很完美,很主动,是我喜欢的类型。很

18 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTC669 viewsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @hhjxreport

【沪杭精选报告】: https://t.me/hhlsml 联系方式:@xiaomoli5 💰 水费:1300p 💃 颜值身材:人照9.5分,颜值不错,乖乖女长相,身材嫩妹身材,胸软臀翘,皮肤白皙 🏡 课室环境:静安某老小区,课室内环境不错,装修还挺好的 ⚖️ 优点缺点:优点情绪价值高,标准乖乖女,反差感强,无缺点 🌟 推荐:相当推荐 📝 过程描述: 一进门小妹妹就帮忙脱鞋卸下背包,然后递水帮忙擦汗,服务很细致,然后在沙发上简单聊了一下天就开始舌吻起来了,一摸小蜜穴全是蜜水,不知舌了多久,然后脱衣洗漱,帮洗很细致,水中萧也很棒,还有帮忙擦干。挑选了一件适合她的可爱风常服就开始又一轮的舌吻,嫩妹三点式服务,服务很细致也很认真,然后口的时间也很久,深喉也很深,反向服务狂舔妹妹的蜜穴,蜜穴户型很漂亮,三点粉,差不多了就带套插入,蜜穴水分充足,包裹感强,具体爱爱过程不描述了,妹妹一点也不催,叫声很好听,反馈也很足,最后顺利出水,感觉时

18 Aug 2026, 15:24 UTC679 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

💃艺名:小茉莉 ✈️资料:https://t.me/shxyls/29501 ⛳️位置: #静安区 🙍‍♂️学生:岸岸 ———————————————— 老师非常水嫩,全程夹子音,女友感十足,略有罪恶感。 服务非常好,本人cj不多,是我迄今为止碰到服务最好,且主动的老师。肤白,可爱,完全符合我的xp,可惜精力有限,要不然再来1p,期待下次,绝对值得复刷。希望各位好好爱护。

Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @xiaomoli_yu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“小茉莉的小屋” (@xiaomoli_yu), 2,183 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xiaomoli_yu.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.