Channel
@xiaoyu5923
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
134subscribers
-13 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001733424274 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xiaoyu5923 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 20 August 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xiaoyu5923 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 23:16 | 134 | -5 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 02:14 | 139 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:13 | 143 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:37 | 144 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:57 | 146 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:45 | 147 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:53 | 147 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 20 August 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 February 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
68 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💩 | 26 | 38.2% | |
| ❤ | 21 | 30.9% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 22.1% | |
| 🤮 | 4 | 5.88% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.47% | |
| 😐 | 1 | 1.47% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 68 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 20 August 2022 to 22 February 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
想业绩长虹，没有一个好的三方角色怎么行 👌本频道只做精品素材~ ❤️套图 【欧美女】：https://t.me/gewen699 ❤️套图 【亚洲男】：https://t.me/gewen789 ❤️套图 【亚洲女】：https://t.me/gewen677 ❤️套图 【欧美男】：https://t.me/gewen6899 ❤️套图 【女私密】：https://t.me/simiads112 👌精品 【话术区】：https://t.me/xiaoyu66823 😇生活 【素材区】：https://t.me/gewen152 😜美工 【证件ps】 :https://t.me/dasd684445 ❤️绘画 【专属定制】https://t.me/LK995682DFC ❤️代写 【人设定制】:https://t.me/xiaoyu5923 😈代开 【飞机会员】https://t.me/LK995688FDS …
❤8💩5👍4👏1
人设代写，专业定制，全球任意国家，任意位置，各种职业，根据您的要求为您打造属于您独一无二的精品人设定位。【包含人物基本信息 家庭住址 人物生活经历 感情经历 创业经历 感情经历等等】 认准唯一客服 @gewen688
💩9❤1
专业人设资料定制 联系 @gewen688
❤7💩7
专业人设资料定制 联系 @gewen688
🤮4
专业人设资料定制 联系 @gewen688
❤2💩1😐1
人设代写，专业定制，全球任意国家，任意位置，各种职业，根据您的要求为您打造属于您独一无二的精品人设定位。【包含人物基本信息 家庭住址 人物生活经历 感情经历 创业经历 感情经历等等】 认准唯一客服 @gewen688
👍4💩1
专业人设资料定制 联系 @gewen688
👍4💩3❤2
专业人设资料定制 联系 @gewen688
👍3❤1
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @xiaoyu5923. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@xiaoyu5923 named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“人设代写” (@xiaoyu5923), 134 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xiaoyu5923.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.