💯 车评系统 | 默认模式 【老师信息】:星玥 【验证留名】:shieldman 【上课时间】:2026-08-30 【整体评价】:👍 好评 【人照得分】:9 【颜值得分】:10 【身材得分】:9 【服务得分】:10 【态度得分】:10 【环境得分】:9 【过程描述】:文笔不太行,颜值真的超级高,对于我这种颜控,真是太值得了,星玥妹纸非常的嫩,身材很好,特别瘦,一点赘肉都没有,胸很软,屁股很有弹性,妹纸胸前有符文,不过不要紧。跟妹纸约课的时候,能感觉到妹纸非常的温柔体贴,这次换了各种姿势,妹纸都非常配合,没有一点不愿意。全程没有冷场。文笔不行,总之,颜控无脑冲。 【上课证明】:未上传 【群组信息】:河南郑州学生会

Channel
星玥小屋
@xingyuejia
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,188subscribers
+172 since we began measuring on 31 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004482074639 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xingyuejia |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 23 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 31 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xingyuejia |
Topic
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 08:01 | 1,188 | +23 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 09:22 | 1,165 | +30 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 09:57 | 1,135 | +37 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 12:40 | 1,098 | +76 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:25 | 1,022 | +6 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:00 | 1,016 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 23 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 56.2%
- avg views ÷ 1,188 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 668
- 12 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 12
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (23 August 2026 – 31 August 2026) |
| Views total | 8,010 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 31 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 8s
- Average length
- 8s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
开课了哥哥们,可以约了😘
下课了哥哥们,明天见
开课了哥哥们,可以预约了
下课了哥哥
谢谢哥哥支持🥰
谢谢哥哥短评
开课了哥哥们,可以约了
今天满了,哥哥们明天约🙈
💯 车评系统 | 评价模版 当前模版 郑州学生会报告模板 【妹子花名】:星玥 【验证留名】:匿名 【人照得分】: 10 【颜值得分】: 10 【身材得分】: 9 【服务得分】: 9 【态度得分】: 9 【环境得分】: 9 【综合得分】: 9.33 【验证时间】:2026-08-27 【过程描述】:老师服务态度非常好,无缺点。课室在小区,进出方便,私密性较好,课室干净空间大。 老师人照基本合一,身材小巧玲珑,整体很协调,屁股很软,后入起来很爽。 进门后和老师先聊了一会,休息完后先一起入浴,洗完后老师帮忙一起擦拭身体,期间老师夸我的肉很结实,而且臀部很翘,能不能多捏几下。出浴后老师让我先躺着,亲咪咪,然后一路向下,老师的口活技术很厉害。 前戏完事后带上tt先从女上开始,后面换了传教式还有后入,后入驾驶的时候可以体验老师软软的屁股,老师还会反手握住我的手腕一起配合,最后换成传教式一起冲刺。结束后洗了下和老师聊了会…
差一步就见面了哥哥
开课啦哥哥们
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @xingyuejia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“星玥小屋” (@xingyuejia), 1,188 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xingyuejia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.