#频道互推 #相似推荐 ------------------------------ 📢 西安艺妓 📢 东南亚大事件|华人新闻|热点爆料 📢 中国大事件/中文日记 📢 东南亚大事件 「新闻曝光」 📢 初冬小远OVO 📢 Telegram-环球新闻时讯 📢 全球:国际新闻、曝光 📢 全球新闻事件 📢 东南亚华人新闻| 吃瓜|爆料 📢 头条曝光 ------------------------------ 🤝 加入互推 · 获得曝光,赚邀请奖励

Channel
【新事件】东南亚曝光l新闻l吃瓜🅥
@xinshijian
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
24,254subscribers
+844 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001269639058 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xinshijian |
| Description | 新事件 @xinshijian 专注收集各种博彩行业最新资讯推送/海外安全/安危事件/狗推交流群/博彩资讯/吃瓜爆料/社会热点推送/权威分享东南亚最新实时动态 头条事件导航: @xintoutiao ☎️ 爆料投稿: @baoguang1bot ✅ 广告招商: @shenshen ⭐️strictly comply with Telegram's Terms of Service,ZERO false rumors #东南亚 #柬埔寨 #菲律宾 #缅甸 #泰国 #迪拜 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xinshijian |
Topic
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Oct 2026, 15:21 | 24,254 | -275 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 20:22 | 24,529 | +14,056 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 23:18 | 10,473 | -181 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 21:39 | 10,654 | -593 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 02:19 | 11,247 | -450 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:02 | 11,697 | -875 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 06:58 | 12,572 | -458 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 03:59 | 13,030 | -230 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 08:40 | 13,260 | -203 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:58 | 13,463 | -448 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 19:15 | 13,911 | -603 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 14,514 | -293 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:34 | 14,807 | -206 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 14:33 | 15,013 | -438 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:57 | 15,451 | -316 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 10:47 | 15,767 | -32 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:36 | 15,799 | -88 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 12:35 | 15,887 | -307 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 10:56 | 16,194 | -433 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 19:44 | 16,627 | first reading |
Engagement
750 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 67 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 8.53%
- avg views ÷ 24,254 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,070
- 184 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.047%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 184
- of 750 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 184 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 750 (7 August 2026 – 5 October 2026) |
| Views total | 380,501 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Oct 2026, 22:24 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈37,300
- Videos
- ≈7,600
- Links
- ≈17,600
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1h 28m
- Average length
- 27s
Measured directly from 196 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 60.0% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 40.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 750 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 750 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 5 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🇨🇳 从柬埔寨逃到斯里兰卡!电诈兄弟大楼上班2月,直呼“太爽了” 有网友投稿称,他和兄弟从柬埔寨组队绕道日韩新加坡后顺利入境斯里兰卡,英文不好靠手机翻译也丝滑过关。抵达科伦坡后,公司安排在大楼里上班,这让他俩直呼“恐慌”——毕竟在柬埔寨时都是在公寓或民房打野。但科伦坡大楼里人满为患,日韩泰马越等各国面孔不少,中国人反而不算多。硬着头皮干了2个多月,发现这边根本没有像柬埔寨那样突袭检查或随机抓外国人查护照的事。同事说,有人待了1年多从没遇到过警察移民局来查。对比2026年上半年还在柬埔寨提心吊胆的日子,简直爽到飞起。现在他们每天敲键盘下班后逛商城、买菜做饭,活得像个正常白领,不再战战兢兢疑神疑鬼了。 #斯里兰卡 #科伦坡 #电诈 #柬埔寨 #海外打工
🇺🇳 曾经多辉煌现在多凄凉 人间正道是沧桑 曾经多辉煌现在多凄凉,人间正道是沧桑。这句话道出了东南亚地区许多国家的历史沉浮。从吴哥王朝的壮丽庙宇到马六甲海峡的商贸繁荣,往昔的荣光如今只剩残垣断壁。殖民统治、内战动荡、经济起伏,让不少昔日明珠蒙上尘埃。人间正道是沧桑,历史车轮从不留情。东南亚无小事,每一个细微的投稿与澄清爆料,都可能揭开一段被遗忘的真相。从政治丑闻到经济骗局,从文化保护到民生疾苦,沧桑背后是普通人的血泪与尊严。只有直面这些疮疤,才能真正走向重生。 #东南亚 #历史沧桑 #人间正道 #投稿爆料 #社会变迁
🇺🇳 波贝30层大楼突查587人,官方改口:查的是网络博彩,非电诈窝点 柬内政部10月5日就波贝587人案作出更正说明,称10月4日突击搜查的30层建筑实际涉及网络游戏博彩业务,并非此前外界传言的电诈窝点。据悉,10月4日柬埔寨国家警察联合班迭棉吉省执法力量,对该大楼展开行动,共控制587人,其中105名为女性。被控制人员以印尼籍为主,达518人,其余包括泰籍和柬籍人员。内政部副发言人杜速卡回应,早前媒体报道在案件性质描述上存在混淆,本次行动系针对网络游戏博彩,不属网络诈骗科技犯罪范畴。官方此番澄清,旨在厘清案件真实属性,避免误判。目前,相关调查仍在进行中。 #柬埔寨 #波贝 #网络博彩 #突查 #官方澄清
🇨🇳 波贝突查三处住所:22名外籍人员证件齐全,均与网诈无关 班迭棉吉省波贝市当局于10月5日联合多部门开展行政检查,在波贝分区和中央市场分区共排查三处住所,发现22名外籍人员居住,但经核实均未涉及网络诈骗活动。此次行动由省长温拉特里直接下令,省初级法院检察官代表协调,副市长本西拉带队执行。其中,波贝分区一处住所查获16名印尼籍人员(含2名女性),全部证件齐全;中央市场分区两处住所查获6名中国籍人员(含3名女性),同样证件合规,与网络诈骗无关。当局强调检查系常规行政动作,未发现异常情况。PS:真没有了~~🤣 #柬埔寨资讯 #波贝 #行政检查 #外籍人员 #网络诈骗
🇨🇳 缅北电诈幸存者惊险逃亡:从腊戌到老街,最终靠中国边防自首求生 上个月,缅甸老街一家小店里,一个外表沧桑却只有25岁的年轻人引起了我注意。他看起来像三十多岁,实际是因为被人骗到缅甸后遭绑架,被迫做了八个多月的电诈。最初,他被关在当阳的房子里,每天被拷打逼着干诈骗,四个月后又被武装押运到腊戌。押运路上,公司少了几个员工——要么被卖了要么逃了,生死未卜。到了腊戌,他发现关押监视力度明显减弱,公司高层也换了人,局面混乱,这或许与缅甸政府加强打击电诈有关。他觉得机会来了,计划了一两个月,终于在九月二十六号逃出来。他花了两天跑到老街,躲在小民宿里,身上没证件,但联系上家人商量后,决定去口岸找中国边防军自首。他每天来我店里吃饭,我见他可怜,经常免费多加点饭菜,一来二去就熟了。十月三号国庆节那天,我介绍了个会说中文的本地人带他去入境口岸找边防公安站。本地人回来说,亲眼看他走了进去,我才彻底松了口气。 #缅甸 #电诈 #逃亡 #自首 #…
🇺🇳 金界前三季度博彩收入暴跌21.5%,柬埔寨赌业龙头遭遇寒流 金界控股最新财报显示,截至2026年9月30日的九个月内,这家柬埔寨博彩巨头交出了一份惨淡成绩单:博彩总收入仅4.18亿美元,同比缩水21.5%;博彩净收入也降至3.89亿美元,同比减少16.7%。要知道,金界手握政府1995年授予的70年独家赌场经营牌照,是名副其实的柬埔寨博彩一哥。但即便有如此硬核背书,也挡不住行业整体下行的趋势。今年上半年,公司就已露出疲态——博彩总收入3.037亿美元,同比下滑8.6%;纯利1.44亿美元,同比减少3.2%。一荣俱荣,一损俱损,博彩业的冷暖在金界身上体现得淋漓尽致。随着东南亚博彩竞争加剧及全球消费疲软,金界这个老牌玩家还能否守住阵地?市场正用脚投票。 #金界控股 #柬埔寨博彩 #博彩收入下滑 #金界财报 #赌场经营牌照
🇨🇳 缅甸和榜镇突查:87名涉诈涉赌人员落网,75人来自中国 据缅甸官方消息,10月5日上午,掸邦南部巴欧自治区和榜镇(Hopong Township)开展联合执法行动,成功摧毁一处电信网络诈骗及赌博窝点,当场抓获87名涉案人员,并缴获大量涉案物品。行动由当地人民民兵部队(People's Militia)执行,他们在瑙莱穆菲村行政区(Naung Lai Mu Fit Village Tract)纳隆村(Na-Lone Village)附近巡逻警戒时,发现一处可疑场所,经突击检查确认为诈骗赌博活动据点。现场共抓获87人,包括75名中国籍人员和12名缅甸籍人员,同时查获星链(Starlink)设备、多部手机及相关作案工具。目前,所有涉案人员及物资已移交和榜镇警察局,当地有关部门正展开进一步调查,依法追究相关责任。这一行动展示了缅甸执法部门对跨境犯罪的高压态势。 #缅甸 #电信诈骗 #和榜镇 #星链 #打击犯罪
🇺🇳 曼谷机场大案!行李箱暗藏170万美元未申报,两外籍旅客当场被扣 据泰国媒体10月5日报道,曼谷素万那普国际机场上演惊人一幕:警方与海关人员在两名从印尼雅加达飞抵的外籍旅客行李箱中,查获隐藏的约170万美元巨额现金,折合泰铢超过6000万。根据泰国法律规定,入境旅客携带外币现钞超过2万美元必须向海关申报。由于二人明显违反规定,未依法申报,警方当场扣押了全部涉案资金,并拘捕两名嫌疑人。目前,海关及警方尚未公开两名外籍人员的具体身份及确切查扣金额,相关调查仍在进行中。此案引发外界对跨国洗钱及非法资金流动的关注,泰国当局正深挖资金来源与去向。 #曼谷机场 #未申报现金 #170万美元 #素万那普 #泰国海关
🇺🇳 越南女子疑遭非法拘禁后遗弃金边街头 据网友投稿,一名神志不清的越南女子近日被人强行带到柬埔寨金边水净华区水净华分区后丢弃。目击者称该女子状态异常,语言混乱,明显无法正常交流,疑似遭受过精神或药物控制。目前当地警方尚未公布案件进展,但网友呼吁尽快核实女子身份并追查幕后团伙。此类跨境人口拐卖事件在东南亚边境地区屡有发生,受害者常因语言不通、证件缺失而难以获得及时救助。柬埔寨内政部应协调越南使领馆启动领事保护程序,同时加强对无良中介及黑心雇主的监管力度。金边作为柬埔寨首都,治安管理尤需警惕此类针对外籍弱势群体的恶性犯罪。 #越南女子 #金边 #人口拐卖 #柬埔寨治安 #网友求助
🇨🇳 铁证如山!中国民警冒死深入缅北电诈园区,带回1020命案关键物证 据央视新闻报道,在缅北果敢老街持续战事的阴影下,中国公安民警仍毅然深入一线,冒险进入当地电诈园区调查取证。面对枪林弹雨和复杂局势,民警不顾个人安危,誓言“哪怕尸体带不回,也要把生物检材带回来”,最终成功获取了涉及明家1020命案及赌诈犯罪的核心物证。这些物证不仅是破案的关键,更是对跨境犯罪链条的铁血拷问。报道指出,此次行动充分展现了中国警方打击跨国犯罪、维护公民生命财产安全的坚定决心,也向国际社会揭露了缅北地区电诈团伙的残忍与猖獗。 #央视新闻 #缅北果敢老街 #明家1020命案 #跨境犯罪 #中国警方
🇨🇳 柬埔寨10天驱逐494名非法外国人,涉及28个国籍,打击网络诈骗不手软 根据柬埔寨移民总局10月5日发布的消息,2026年9月21日至30日期间,当局共驱逐了494名非法居留的外国人,包括52名女性,涉及28个国籍。此次行动是在柬埔寨副总理兼内政部长苏速卡的指示下开展的,由移民总局局长Sok Veasna部署,要求相关执法部门持续依法打击非法居留行为,并推进遣返工作。被驱逐人员来自喀麦隆、科特迪瓦、中国、日本、越南、泰国、俄罗斯、英国、美国等多个国家。其中,23名越南籍人员(含5名女性)涉嫌参与网络诈骗,已通过专机及边境口岸被遣返回国。其余人员涉及非法越境、伪造文件、绑架勒索、毒品犯罪等。移民总局强调,这是落实首相洪玛奈关于打击非法外国人及网络犯罪指示的一部分,柬埔寨绝不允许犯罪分子利用其领土从事诈骗及其他违法活动。目前相关部门正持续加大清剿力度,追查幕后主犯并协助受骗人员安全返回原籍国。 #柬埔寨 #非法驱逐 #网络…
Showing the 12 most recent of 750 posts we hold for @xinshijian. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@xinshijian edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 24 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 24 August 2026
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“【新事件】东南亚曝光l新闻l吃瓜🅥” (@xinshijian), 24,254 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xinshijian.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.