Channel
@xinwen186
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,094subscribers
-40 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001974255746 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xinwen186 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xinwen186 |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 3 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @xw186/173066 Aug 2026, 10:17 UTC | @xinwen186/65089 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @xw186/173076 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC | @xinwen186/65091 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @xw186/173086 Aug 2026, 13:30 UTC | @xinwen186/65092 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @xw186/173096 Aug 2026, 13:30 UTC | @xinwen186/65093 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @xw186/173106 Aug 2026, 13:30 UTC | @xinwen186/65094 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @xw186/173156 Aug 2026, 13:30 UTC | @xinwen186/65099 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @xw186 | 11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @xw186 (11–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 13 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 6 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @xw186. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 09:20 | 1,094 | -8 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 17:57 | 1,102 | -7 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 19:59 | 1,109 | -13 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 13:42 | 1,122 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:38 | 1,123 | -7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:59 | 1,130 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 09:35 | 1,131 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:55 | 1,130 | -4 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:47 | 1,134 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:51 | 1,137 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:57 | 1,135 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:46 | 1,134 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
#斯里兰卡：商务签突然变难 中国申请人审批全面放慢 近期，不少计划前往斯里兰卡进行商务交流的中国申请人发现，商务签证审批明显变慢，甚至出现长时间没有结果的情况。 据了解，斯里兰卡移民部门近期收紧商务签审核，取消此前较快的自动审批模式，改为人工逐一审核。主要原因是近期出现部分外国人借商务名义入境后违规滞留、非法工作等问题，当局因此加强入境管理。 目前商务签流程变为：材料人工审核 → 移民局录入系统 → 批量缴费 → 统一出签。由于申请量增加，加上审核积压，导致整体办理周期延长。 申请商务签时，需准备真实有效材料，包括护照、往返机票、当地企业邀请函、邀请公司资料以及联系人信息等。虚假邀请或不完整材料，可能导致拒签或长期等待。 业内提醒，近期计划赴斯里兰卡的人员应提前申请，不要临近出行才提交。 如果只是短期商务拜访、考察交流，部分符合条件的人员也可考虑申请旅游ETA入境，但需确保行程符合相关规定。目前斯里兰卡并未停止办理商…
缅甸军方突查纳散镇中国电诈团伙，知情人士透露实为“摆拍作秀” 8月5日：据报道，缅甸军政府军队在南部掸邦纳散镇纳扬村（Nar Yine）附近地区，对一处中国电信诈骗团伙的大本营展开了突击搜查，该区域处于纳扬民兵团的控制之下。 军方资讯显示，此次行动共抓获了38名与电诈团伙相关的中国籍人员以及43名劳工，并缴获了1栋建筑物、多支枪支、67部手机、电脑、6套星链装置及相关运营工具。 然而，接近纳散镇军方的知情人士透露，由于网路幕后老板拒绝支付被索要的利益分成，此次行动仅仅是一次象征性的“走过场”。被捕人员大多只是普通劳工，而真正的幕后老板并未落网。 知情人士还补充称，该电诈据点自2025年初开始运营，当地军方及民兵武装对其实际存在一直心知肚明。 自“1027行动”后，曾盘踞在掸邦北部的中国电诈网路已分散至掸邦各地，并至今仍在许多区域继续活动。 #5G吃瓜 搞笑视频 😂 导航联盟 🧭 东南亚风景 🇲🇲
#网友投稿 ：瓦雷度假村金耀集团的后勤 和尚，又叫黑龙，住度假村七栋105房间 敲诈勒索，跟我家里要40万人民币才放我回来，我真的能有那么多赔付吗？公司让我赔付多少你以为我不知道吗？这简直就是天价赔付，我问了很多人就没有见过那么高的赔付，黑公司我认识在三佛塔也就3万美金， 而且整天在公司也是无所事事，什么事都不做，仗着老板对他的信任老板不在他黑公司多少钱都不知道，在办公室连最基本的生活保障都没有， 不说什么就最基本的办公室连水都没有得喝，我已经在国内报警了，你等着被收拾吧。人不做做畜生。 员工想赔付回家，直接遭到恐吓和威胁。 公司长期限制人身自由，要求员工上交私人手机，实施强迫劳动，工作时间普遍长达16小时。丝毫没有休息时间。 公司整天在做国盘军包，公司内还有50个被困人员，都是被骗贩卖过来的，而且还在卖人。 我已经在国内报警了，而且我已经联系了好几个被你敲诈的人，我们会一起联名报警，你就等着吧。 谷歌地图坐标：…
🤣😂🤣😁东方汇国际娱乐赌场🙄 🤣😂🤣😁有国家政府批准合法合规注册经营许可证的大型国际赌场🙄 ➡️首存赠送🤨♠️♠️🎲，最高🕉♐️♐️♐️元 🎲🎲🎲存款有礼 ，返利 🎲🎲 现金存款有礼 最高可送🕉🎲 😳主营：AG视讯，PG电子，JDB电子，CQ9电子，PNG电子，PP电子，MG电子😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳 ➡️充值提现支持：😟😉😞😊微信、支付宝、网银转账、🎲🎲🎲，多种支付快捷方式 😳官方游戏下载注册网址：https://web.877798.com:3306/login/?&pid=52514011 😳游戏上下分群：https://t.me/+pSjLGTcVNHY4YTdl 😳下载注册教程：https://t.me/DFHYL18/31 😳更多福利尽在东方汇📴 传送门 ➡️🙄 东方汇娱乐简介🙄 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀
#曼谷 联合国办事处前 缅民众抗议敏昂莱访泰 8月6日，一批缅甸民众聚集在曼谷联合国办事处前，抗议缅甸军政府领导人敏昂莱访问泰国。 抗议者谴责军政府的暴力行径，并主要呼吁泰国政府不应给予敏昂莱官方认可，同时要求联合国等国际社会明确站在缅甸人民一边。 #5G吃瓜 搞笑视频 😂 导航联盟 🧭 东南亚风景 🇲🇲
#网友投稿 ：缅甸老军营九栋一路发公司压榨员，早上七点上班，凌晨1-2下班，每天上班莫名其妙的罚款。 别人家一个月才拿千把块美金，每天罚个四五千泰铢。听里面跟监狱一样，进出的很麻烦，建议大家不要去这个公司。 PS：进了这种公司 人立马变成牛马 #5G吃瓜 搞笑视频 😂 导航联盟 🧭 东南亚风景 🇲🇲
#网友投稿 ：#越南 大网红凯先生疑似和柬埔寨灰产行业有瓜葛，目前越南警方已经对其逮捕。 #5G吃瓜 搞笑视频 😂 导航联盟 🧭 东南亚风景 🇲🇲
#网友投稿：昨晚，澳门银河门口死了3个人，换汇的起了贪恋，收了人家的钱不办事，被人家追到银河赌场门口直接剁了。 #5G吃瓜 搞笑视频 😂 导航联盟 🧭 东南亚风景 🇲🇲
#泰国 新闻：坐飞机要小心了 你的行李箱，可能在你毫不知情的情况下被打开！ 泰国机场新规正式公布！ 从2026年10月16日起，只要安检系统判定你的托运行李“可疑”，工作人员无需通知你到场，就能直接开箱检查！ ❗️如果打不开怎么办？ 答案是：直接剪锁！甚至破坏行李锁具！ 更让网友炸锅的是 如果最后证明只是误判，箱子里根本没有任何违禁品，行李锁坏了、物品损坏甚至丢失，谁来赔？ 目前公布的新规中，并没有明确说明旅客损失由谁承担！ 消息曝光后，大批网友热议： 🗣“安全重要，但旅客权益呢？” 🗣“要是名牌行李箱被剪坏怎么办？” 🗣“以后还敢锁行李吗？” 🗣“东西少了，又该找谁负责？” 有人支持新规，认为这是国际惯例，有助于防止危险物品登机；也有人认为，赋予检查权的同时，更应该建立完善的赔偿机制，不能让旅客独自承担损失。 #5G吃瓜 搞笑视频 😂 导航联盟 🧭 东南亚风景 🇲🇲
#斯威士兰：一批 中国公民 因涉嫌非法网络赌博被捕后，等待遣返期间引发争议。 据当地媒体报道，这批中国人今年3月因警方突查涉嫌网赌窝点 被抓，随后因违反移民法规被判处罚款。 近日，他们向法院申请离开拘留场所，在警方看守下入住酒店，并表示住宿、交通及安保费用全部自费承担。 但法院现场质疑：既然有能力支付酒店和看守费用，为何不直接用这笔钱安排离境返回中国？目前，这批人员仍在等待遣返 处理。 #5G吃瓜 搞笑视频 😂 导航联盟 🧭 东南亚风景 🇲🇲
#西港 警方抓获3名连环持枪抢劫嫌疑犯 8月4日，西港省警察局刑警队联合西港市警局迅速出击，成功破获近期发生在西港市第3分区及第4分区的两起加重盗窃（抢劫）案。 调查显示，这两起抢劫案系同一犯罪团伙所为。行动中，警方成功逮捕3名越南籍犯罪嫌疑人，并对2处藏匿窝点展开搜查，当场查获手枪1支、子弹、涉嫌毒品的物质以及大量作案工具和涉案财物。 目前，3名犯罪嫌疑人正在接受深入讯问，警方正依法整理案卷，以便移交司法机关作进一步审理。 PS：西港的越南人真的暴躁～～ #5G吃瓜 搞笑视频 😂 导航联盟 🧭 东南亚风景 🇲🇲
#国内新闻：林某等8人跨境电信网络诈骗案一审宣判 江苏广电8月5日报道：近日，江苏省淮安市清江浦区人民法院对林某等8人跨境电信网络诈骗案件一审宣判。 经审理查明：2023年3月，林某等8名被告人看到境外高薪招工信息，明知岗位涉嫌违法，仍以旅游为名弄虚作假办理护照，前往东南亚某诈骗窝点。该案系刘某、洪某（现在逃）操控的犯罪集团，通过社交软件虚构人设，诱导境内受害人在虚假资金盘投资实施诈骗。8名被告人在窝点负责账号养号、话术聊天，参与诈骗活动。被告人回国后陆续被公安机关抓获。 法院认为：8名被告人明知他人实施电信网络诈骗，仍赴境外加入犯罪集团，行为均构成诈骗罪；弄虚作假骗取护照出境，同时构成偷越国（边）境罪，依法数罪并罚。综合犯罪情节、认罪认罚、退赃等情况，分别判处八人有期徒刑一年二个月至二年不等，并处罚金。 #5G吃瓜 搞笑视频 😂 导航联盟 🧭 东南亚风景 🇲🇲
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @xinwen186. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“缅甸新闻|东南亚新闻|头条新闻|华人新闻|吃瓜爆料” (@xinwen186), 1,094 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xinwen186.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.