Channel
@xizinb000
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,599subscribers
+4,529 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004409847575 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xizinb000 |
| Created | 1 July 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xizinb000 |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 37% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
@xizinb000 was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 09:21 | 5,599 | -51 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 09:40 | 5,650 | -6,722 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 17:39 | 12,372 | +9,994 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 00:20 | 2,378 | -13 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 13:00 | 2,391 | +2,383 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 8 | -2,460 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 2,468 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 12:24 | 2,471 | -5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 2,476 | +2,469 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:07 | 7 | -2,446 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 18:32 | 2,453 | +2,447 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:07 | 6 | -2,223 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:04 | 2,229 | +27 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 09:45 | 2,202 | +1,130 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:35 | 1,072 | +2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:30 | 1,070 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 1 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
8 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 62.5% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 37.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
新项目王者戏子纯算法 ----------------------------- 🔥🔥无视账号强标 无视卡框闪框 不动任何内存 无视三方网络波动 无视客户端异常 流畅稳定144帧 月底无视系统外挂180 主打一个稳定 加入频道 https://t.me/xizinb000 反馈联系 @xizinb6 免手续主卡网：http://103.186.214.206//links/5495C7B4 有手续备用卡网 https://shop.368fk.cn/shop/NFJ0904O
Photo, posted without a caption
👍1
反馈加时 @mqnb88
👍1
野鸡 pinned a photo
外部QQ群301250714
王者野鸡内部 ----------------------------- 🔥🔥8月9日反馈 无视账号强标 无视卡框闪框 不动任何内存 无视三方网络波动 无视客户端异常 流畅稳定144帧 无视系统外挂180 主打一个稳定，这赛季不会再更新了，稳到不用更新，无视游戏小更新和月底检测 加入频道 https://t.me/yejinb000 外部QQ3群301250714 客服 @mqnb88 免手续主卡网：http://103.186.214.206//links/621BA855 有手续备用卡网https://shop.368fk.cn/shop/NFJ0904O
❤3
已上传一键隐藏教程
👍1
93871 70948 93520 95746 19537 60127 97312 68405 51742 70248
8分钟后发卡
❤2
Channel name was changed to «野鸡（凌晨12点继续送天卡多多帮我宣传吧）»
现在想玩的都玩上了
02716 53461 56201 42751 07426 65497 01589 63750 02574 80693
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @xizinb000. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“戏子王者算法解密” (@xizinb000), 5,599 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xizinb000.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.