Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 淑芬(健身)

Channel

淑芬(健身)

@xmsf000

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,313subscribers

+173 since we began measuring on 25 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003747745909
TypeChannel
Username@xmsf000
Created24 May 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded25 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/xmsf000

Growth

1,1401,3131,226.525 August 2026 — 1,140 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,140 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,180 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,241 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,313 subscribers25 August 20261 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +173. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,114–1,339 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 04:341,313+72
28 Aug 2026, 23:141,241+61
26 Aug 2026, 07:031,180+40
25 Aug 2026, 09:001,140no change
25 Aug 2026, 08:451,140first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 24 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
102.5%
avg views ÷ 1,313 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,350
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.076%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026
Posts held18 (24 May 202625 August 2026)
Views total21,529
Reactions total10
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
51s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

10 reactions across 5 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Aug 2026, 06:20 UTC195 viewsread 25 August 2026

小分队老师报告模板 【验证日期】:6.12 【验证老师】:淑芬 【地 区】:万达 【服务价格】:900pp 【人照几分】:8 【胸部状况】:34c 【优点缺点】:漂亮,身材好,反应真实 验证过程及感受: 第一感觉就是细腻,从约课到前往课室老师一直很耐心,到了课室以后看到老师的笑脸觉得刚刚赶路的30分钟已经值了,进入浴室后脑子里都是那双晃晃悠悠的美腿,简单洗漱过后进入课程,在一番番眼神的扫过和脚尖的触碰,耳边的情绪和玉手的轻抚过后,情欲被挑逗到了巅峰,这和平时课程不一样的点就是不会第一时间触碰你,而是把你的感觉全都吊起来,再一点一点喂饱你,确实需要时间搭建,但是试过之后就知道是真的很满足,然后轻轻松松释放两次,现在摸摸脸颊还感觉老师在课上触摸留下了烙印,非常满足,课程设计很精心,老师综合能力也很好,重点是jio jio很好看,值得推荐! 联系方式:@xmsc520

25 Aug 2026, 06:17 UTC201 viewsread 25 August 2026

凯撒宫出击报告 验证留名:李家 验证时间:5.25 老师花名:#淑芬 城市坐标:#大唐五缘 花费:500 颜值身材:9 服务内容:洗,调情 ,胸推,舔a面,冰火 优点: 很骚,而且老师天天健身,身材很可以 体验细节: 下午看到上榜,在我上班附近,果断出击。楼下就有两家银行取钱还是很方便的,根据指引进门,一个性感美丽的小姐姐映入眼帘,并没有着急让你洗澡上床,拉着你聊几句,再是去洗澡,洗完贴心的给你擦身子。然后让你躺床上随后便是感受到一个软乎乎的小舌头在我的鸡鸡和蛋蛋上面游走,小姐姐属于那种温柔的口交,别有一番滋味,让我飘飘欲仙,口到差不多便戴套直奔主题。先是女上,极其顺畅,小穴温润湿滑,日感极佳,差点被秒了,换了好几个姿势,只能说神仙般的享受,小穴水非常多,操起来相当舒服,情绪价值很足,不机车,做爱反馈真实,小姐姐下面水很多 很有感觉 小穴也很紧的 夹着很有感觉。小姐姐很温柔,不催,这个500我觉得花的值! 联系老师:@xmsfj

25 Aug 2026, 06:08 UTC347 views0 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

蓝莓草莓想我了没🥰 需要联系 @xmsfjj

17 Aug 2026, 09:59 UTC≈1,600 viewsread 25 August 2026
Video

红休啦一周后见、等我回来宝宝们😘😘

14 Aug 2026, 06:08 UTC≈1,960 views3 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

白茶清欢无别事,我在等风也在等你🥰开课啦宝宝们

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @xmsf000. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“淑芬(健身)” (@xmsf000), 1,313 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xmsf000.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.