Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 40 days, net -54. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,571–5,730 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 08:58
5,658
+69
12 Sept 2026, 20:17
5,589
-22
8 Sept 2026, 19:21
5,611
-64
3 Sept 2026, 06:26
5,675
-3
30 Aug 2026, 15:54
5,678
-5
27 Aug 2026, 11:47
5,683
-4
24 Aug 2026, 22:13
5,687
-2
21 Aug 2026, 10:25
5,689
-7
18 Aug 2026, 17:22
5,696
-6
16 Aug 2026, 03:33
5,702
-2
12 Aug 2026, 23:23
5,704
-1
10 Aug 2026, 03:21
5,705
-7
7 Aug 2026, 09:30
5,712
no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:20
5,712
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 26 October 2025 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
1,097 reactions across 10 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
861
78.5%
🐳
160
14.6%
🍓
76
6.93%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,097 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 26 October 2025 to 8 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
74
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 10 we hold a reading for · 50%
Most on one post
57
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @xorespebp. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 October 2025 to 8 December 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🧟React2Shell CVE-2025-55182 с оценкой 10 уже в арсенале китайских APT
Критическая уязвимость в React Server Components уже ушла "в поле". Китайские группировки Earth Lamia и Jackpot Panda начали эксплуатировать баг CVE-2025-55182, получивший неофициальное имя React2Shell. Уязвимость с оценкой 10 по CVSS позволяет удаленно выполнять произвольный код без аутентификации на сервере, если проект еще не обновлен до React …
интернету пизда
видимо грядет новая эпидемия, как было во времена eternal blue
пока публичного рабочего poc нет, но думаю сейчас начнутся прям массовые взломы 🥹
кто хотел ai ассистента без цензуры и ограничений
реально часто спрашивали, это не реклама, просто делюсь
digdig2nugjpszzmqe5ep2bk7lqfpdlyrkojsx2j6kzalnrqtwedr3id.onion
вообще такая интересная тема, есть ряд тем о которых вроде хочется рассказать и думаю в очередной раз видос наберет миллионы просмотров, но когда сам начинаешь использовать техники и какие-то технические фишки в работе больше палить их не сильно хочется, но в тоже время понимаешь что всем будет интересно....
похоже на желание выложить фотки с какого-то крутого объекта, ценой запала актуальности залаза
последнее вре…
все больше стал склоняться к тому что одновременный рост в технической сфере и постоянный постинг в медиа невозможны, как только начинаешь много постить - уходишь в это, и на техническое развитие вне контекста постов времени не остается
а когда начинаешь реальные задачи решать так же начинаешь уходить в это и на посты просто не остается времени
что б РЕАЛЬНО делать это все одновременно надо быть просто ебнутым
по факту я практически в лайве это все писал, были естественно ошибки, и написана лишь маленькая часть проекта, хоть видос и на 2 часа
в описании к видосу ссылка на репозиторий, там уже финальная версия на конец видоса
мой код скорее всего уебщиный, конечно я не могу с пол пинка написать идеальный rest api бэк на С, но думаю что только так научусь чистый код хороший писать, а вы можете заценить видос и тоже попробо…
на днях решил ебануться и устроить небольшой челлендж,
начал писать интернет магазин на почти чистом С (там используется лишь драйвер для pg и libuv.h)
пишу в vim без подсветки синтаксиса
первый видос уже отснят, там будет создание соединения и миграции бд, видео вышло достаточно долгим, естественно было ебанутое количество ошибок компиляции, и все это исправление тоже попало на видос
это просто интеллектуальный ч…
привет всем...
хотел бы начать всё заново, наверное это немного грустно, но иногда нужно не бояться проститься с прошлым, что бы идти в будущее.
теперь тут будет более большой канал, про urban exploration, хакинг, безопасность и деанон, а не просто рандомные посты из моей жизни.
относительно недавно я нашел своё истинное призвание.
потихоньку стал заниматься расследованиями инцидентов. да, пока ни одна история о…
❤305🍓37🐳32
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @xorespebp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“xor” (@xorespebp), 5,658 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xorespebp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.