Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 42 days, net -313. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,419–14,826 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 05:57
14,466
-16
15 Sept 2026, 07:38
14,482
-12
13 Sept 2026, 17:22
14,494
-14
12 Sept 2026, 02:00
14,508
-22
9 Sept 2026, 20:40
14,530
-28
6 Sept 2026, 12:20
14,558
-15
4 Sept 2026, 04:58
14,573
-29
2 Sept 2026, 16:29
14,602
-19
1 Sept 2026, 11:54
14,621
-12
31 Aug 2026, 12:55
14,633
-13
30 Aug 2026, 10:13
14,646
-6
29 Aug 2026, 07:27
14,652
-7
28 Aug 2026, 06:16
14,659
-2
27 Aug 2026, 04:13
14,661
-4
26 Aug 2026, 04:38
14,665
-9
25 Aug 2026, 03:58
14,674
-9
23 Aug 2026, 22:05
14,683
-16
22 Aug 2026, 05:36
14,699
-3
20 Aug 2026, 20:47
14,702
-12
19 Aug 2026, 20:34
14,714
first reading
Engagement
86 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.44%
avg views ÷ 14,466 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,220
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.19%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 86 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
86 (29 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
31,728
Reactions total
1,013
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 18:27 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
19m 27s
Average length
2m 26s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,609 reactions across 86 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
1,478
41.0%
👍
738
20.4%
custom 5386372293263892965
692
19.2%
custom 5449692618151695997
687
19.0%
😁
14
0.388%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 86 of the 86 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,609 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 86 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 86 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
8
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @xpiratovich. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 86 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🪖 Биткоин, сомкнуть щиты!
Как я и писал в этом прогнозе (тык) – если месяц мы закроем выше 73.000$ – план с походом на 49.000$ отменяется.
И так – $BTC закрепился выше 73.000$. А что это значит? Мы пойдем домой выше, Уолтер…
Но, никто не отменяет коррекций на пути к следующей вершине.
Вот мой план работы с BTC:
Перед тем, как мы пойдем штурмовать новые вершины – жду небольшую коррекцию, что является нормой, после…
Доллар уже 87.24. Самое время отметить в реплае прогноз Макса, где он говорил про цель в 78-92₽
Пруфы в реплае. Пруфы в реплае.
В обменниках, кстати, курс уже 88 - 89₽ за 1 USDT. Жирно? Да 🤤
На всякий случай дам мини-ликбез: красные стрелочки – это вход в сделку, а синие – это тейк профиты (частичная фиксация сделки) в прибыль.
Сделка по направлению в шорт – т.е. наша сделка на падение цены 😁
Я знаю, есть разного уровня подготовки люди, но внутри группы все равно все разжевывается как младенцу.
Так что не ссыте.
🏄♂️ Иху! Иди сюда, родная!
Оседлали и прокатились на такой вот кобылке волне в начале дня.
Как понять, что день пройдет на драйве? В копилочку падает +3718$ с парочки сделок ☕️
Сегодня 100% еще будут сделки. Чтобы попасть в группу – пиши в личку Максу @fx_maxim и он добавит тебя бесплатно.
Возьмем сегодня 2-3 человека.
А ниже дам апдейт по BTC.
Вы вообще видите это? 🤣
Со вчерашнего подкаста, где Макс давал $USELESS +60% роста.
Слушали же голосовое от Макса?
Надеюсь, что да. Иначе, вы пропустили ракетку на 60%…
☝🏽 Но не переживайте. Для всех участников торговой группы – мы дропнем стрим, где Макс будет искать такие же активы с ростом на 20%-100%. Даст конкретные точки входа и точки фиксации (от нашей точки входа $USELESS, например, сделал 129% на споте)
…
🎓 Видимо сегодня школьники вместо тетрадок, ручек, линеек и дневников – загрузили портфели отборными щиткоинами…
Иначе, я не могу объяснить, почему наш спекулятивный портфельчик альтов, который брали с ребятами в комьюнити будто стартанул в стратосферу.
Но погодите удивляться.
Мы еще считаем статистику по торговой группе. Как только я ее вам покажу – у вас глаза на лоб полезут. Вы просто не поверите.
Готовьтесь,…
К сожалению (нет) с сегодняшнего дня на просторах Telegram и YouTube станет намного меньше крипто, политической и геополитической аналитики.
Причину вы и так, думаю, все знаете – тяжело совмещать ресерч и контента с уроками в школе и домашкой.
Не расстраивайтесь.
🖤 Зато ваш любимый канал Шеф Пиратович работает в прежнем режиме.
Мне и Максу в школу не надо
(к счастью или к сожалению) 🤣
Так что, кто еще не включил…
Доброе утро всем, кто слушал вчерашний #обзоррынка 🌞
$USELESS из вчерашнего голосового Макса дал за сутки около ~ 35% взрывного роста.
У нас с комьюнити пл спотовой позе +70% (первый скрин), а по фьючу +2534% (второй скрин).
Кто до сих пор не слушал обзор – газ. А если по какой-то причине у вас не включены оповещения о новых постах – бегом включать.
🎙️ – Слушай один такой обзор рынка в день и кошелек болеть не будет…
Ловите, парни, #обзоррынка
Что узнаешь внутри?
• План работы с Биткоином: зоны, откуда брать лонг и зона, от куда берем шорт.
• Чего ТОЧНО НЕЛЬЗЯ сейчас делать?
• Монеты, которые ведут себя сильнее рынка. По какой цене можно прикупить и где фиксировать прибыль?
• Сценарий по эфириуму
• Что-то готовится в мире? Будут какие-то новости? (Индексы кор…
Теперь к хорошим новостям:
🤯 2.5 икса за день – это, бл*ть, новый рекорд в торговой группе
Сразу заткну хейтеров, которые любят оправдывать свою лень и беспомощность через «но это же лудка! Ты же против лудки!!!»
Смотрите, мое мнение:
1. Когда человек вложил свои последние деньги / украл бабкину пенсию и несмотря на все рекомендации завысил сильно риски, дабы жадность сыграла роль и человек хотел «быстрых результат…
Showing the 12 most recent of 86 posts we hold for @xpiratovich. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Фомо. Чешутся руки и хочу купить. Жалею, что не купил.31%
Верю, что это очередная наёбка. Жду падения, чтобы закупиться ниже.69%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 86 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Шеф Пиратович” (@xpiratovich), 14,466 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xpiratovich.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.