Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 42 days, net +44. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,060–2,118 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 06:18
2,111
+2
13 Sept 2026, 18:40
2,109
-1
10 Sept 2026, 04:00
2,110
+8
1 Sept 2026, 20:35
2,102
-1
30 Aug 2026, 05:43
2,103
-2
27 Aug 2026, 06:36
2,105
+2
24 Aug 2026, 11:44
2,103
+3
20 Aug 2026, 17:24
2,100
+7
17 Aug 2026, 12:23
2,093
+13
14 Aug 2026, 09:55
2,080
+8
11 Aug 2026, 01:11
2,072
+4
7 Aug 2026, 14:32
2,068
+1
7 Aug 2026, 10:01
2,067
no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:56
2,067
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 8 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
7s
Average length
7s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
484 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
204
42.1%
❤
89
18.4%
👍
69
14.3%
🤣
41
8.47%
🆒
26
5.37%
👨💻
21
4.34%
😱
12
2.48%
🤔
10
2.07%
😢
7
1.45%
🎉
5
1.03%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 484 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 8 November 2025 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 17 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @xsayjix. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 November 2025 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Многие у кого не заходят видео на YouTube, ловят демотивацию.
ТАК-ЖЕ Я В КОНЦЕ 2025: Теряю более 1 млн руб из-за демонеты...
Но нужно знать, что за каждым падением, всегда есть подъем. Вопрос лишь в том, готовы вы перетерпеть это падение, или сдадитесь и так и не увидите подъема 🤷🏻♂️
За последние пол года, я запустил более 30 каналов в разных нишах / направлениях.
Принесли доход: 9
Был хороший буст: 14+
Не пошли: более 15
Вывод: когда один канал не идет, это еще не повод опускать руки…
😡 Делать ИИ vs Делать Анимации!
Привет каждому! Сегодня хочу поговорить на тему Ии-ниш и Анимационных ниш. Рекомендую почитать внимательно, по желанию можете дать обратную связь🍉
🐵 Начну с Ии ниш - заход в такую нишу очень легкий. Почти у любого человека есть возможность купить нейросеть и начать делать видео = конкуренция бешеная, риск демонеты большой и перенасыщаемость ниши быстрая. Затраты на нейросеть, с учето…
Обучение анимации в blender стартовало почти неделю назад. Уже выпущены основные уроки и проведен созвон, где ученики научились базе, а сейчас уже, после основного урока - они выполняют ДЗ.
И пару человек уже его сделали, смотрите что у них получилось, после урока сделать:
Оценку 😎
Народ, напишите свою фатальную ошибку в ютуб, чтобы новички не вляпались..
Я начну… Продал канал, который позже начал набирать очень мощные обороты, но уже не у меня 😬
Я сейчас сделал следующее, чего и вам советую - это проверка себя, проверка своей дисциплины и своего стремления.
- я записал видео себе в 2027г, где рассказал планы, цели, чего хочу добиться.. А в 2027 я пересмотрю это видео или даже выложу сюда, и проверю - смог ли я этого добиться, не сдался ли, не проебал свою возможность…
Это не просто видео в будущее - это проверка себя.
За помощью обратился человек, у которого аж на 3 каналах, сняли монетизацию «по связи» я составил для него план правильной апелляции, с верными редактированием перед ней. Итог: на одном канале уже вернули монету, осталось еще на 2х 💪🏻✊🏻 Вернуть с этими новыми причинами не всегда получается. Но есть и удачные случаи, такие как этот и еще несколько.
👍17❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @xsayjix. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Асан Дедлайн (Все про 🇺🇸Ютуб) @dadlineasan · 59,270 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 22 August 2026
Деньги Есть! 🏆 dengi4444 @dengi4444 · 24,048 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 17 September 2026
Всё для видеомонтажа @dzhmaterials · 34,071 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Таверна SAYJI” (@xsayjix), 2,111 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xsayjix.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.