Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 红薯源头通知群

Channel

红薯源头通知群

@xsh888a

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

346subscribers

+273 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003916186000
TypeChannel
Username@xsh888a
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 17 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded19 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/xsh888a

Growth

73346209.519 August 2026 — 73 subscribers19 August 2026 — 73 subscribers20 August 2026 — 77 subscribers28 August 2026 — 235 subscribers4 September 2026 — 346 subscribers19 August 20264 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 16 days, net +273. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32–387 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 15:58346+111
28 Aug 2026, 00:12235+158
20 Aug 2026, 01:5777+4
19 Aug 2026, 09:1573no change
19 Aug 2026, 09:0073first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 17 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
40.5%
avg views ÷ 346 subscribers
Avg views / post
140
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026
Posts held17 (17 August 202618 August 2026)
Views total2,243
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken19 Aug 2026, 09:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

18 Aug 2026, 17:24 UTC119 viewsread 19 August 2026

不来码也可能手机浏览器或者网络节点被拦截,你们自行检查下,换下浏览器或者节点,基本都是秒来的

18 Aug 2026, 16:14 UTC126 viewsread 19 August 2026

号玩法很多,有自热得,有热评的,有私信的,包括登入方法很多都自己测测,遇到问题请大家认真看下频道通知,自己找下自身原因。

18 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC132 viewsread 19 August 2026

如果实在不来码,就拿一个手机挂国外节点。另外一个国内手机要登入的先登入发验证码,如果不来,拿你这个挂国外节点的手机在发送下验证码,来了以后你不要输入到节点手机,直接输入到你国内那个手机上面

18 Aug 2026, 15:54 UTC132 viewsread 19 August 2026

现在美国来码有点封控如果不来码,发码的时候最好挂下美国ip

18 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC128 viewsread 19 August 2026

你们不会玩的自己想想办法吧别人有姿势也不会平白无故说的自己研究吧。🤣

18 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTC138 viewsread 19 August 2026

有个别号会被挤号情况,大家上号想要安全的话就修改密码登入,然后小红书id号也改下,登入设备也踢掉,基本就不会被挤号了

18 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC141 viewsread 19 August 2026

上号想要安全的话就修改密码登入,然后小红书名字也改下,登入设备也踢掉,基本就不会被找回了

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @xsh888a. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“红薯源头通知群” (@xsh888a), 346 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xsh888a.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.