Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for XSwap Announcements

Channel

XSwap Announcements

@xswap_link

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,764subscribers

-123 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002070262258
TypeChannel
Username@xswap_link
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/xswap_link

Growth

4,7644,8874,825.57 August 2026 — 4,887 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,887 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,870 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,853 subscribers17 August 2026 — 4,846 subscribers20 August 2026 — 4,835 subscribers23 August 2026 — 4,827 subscribers26 August 2026 — 4,815 subscribers28 August 2026 — 4,809 subscribers31 August 2026 — 4,797 subscribers4 September 2026 — 4,781 subscribers9 September 2026 — 4,764 subscribers7 August 20269 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 33 days, net -123. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,746–4,905 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 11:174,764-17
4 Sept 2026, 03:394,781-16
31 Aug 2026, 14:164,797-12
28 Aug 2026, 23:134,809-6
26 Aug 2026, 00:424,815-12
23 Aug 2026, 05:454,827-8
20 Aug 2026, 02:444,835-11
17 Aug 2026, 13:174,846-7
13 Aug 2026, 23:154,853-17
10 Aug 2026, 14:374,870-17
7 Aug 2026, 19:374,887no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:174,887first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 14 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.588%
avg views ÷ 4,764 subscribers
Avg views / post
28.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
10.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held22 (14 May 202611 August 2026)
Views total28
Reactions total3
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 05:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
32s
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

103 reactions across 21 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥5553.4%
3735.9%
👏54.85%
👍43.88%
😍21.94%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 103 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 19:53 UTC28 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Moving assets to Base takes just a few steps on XSwap. Choose the source chain and supported asset, set Base as the destination, and confirm. XSwap Bridge keeps the transfer easy, powered by @Chainlink CCIP. Bridge to @base → xswap.link/bridge 🔁 Like, Retweet: https://x.com/xswap_link/status/2087265848800993424?s=20 Twitter | Website | Community Telegram

2🔥1

9 Aug 2026, 11:18 UTC129 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Enjoy the Sunday, Marines 🔁 Like, Retweet: https://x.com/xswap_link/status/2086411549594312754 Twitter | Website | Community Telegram

3👏1

4 Aug 2026, 19:29 UTC338 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Choose the chain → Find the token → Swap The new XSwap token picker brings @Chainlink CCIP-supported networks and token search into one cleaner flow. Now live on xswap.link/swap 🔁 Like, Retweet: https://x.com/xswap_link/status/2084722943485940083?s=20 Twitter | Website | Community Telegram

🔥3

2 Aug 2026, 17:22 UTC384 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

40+ chains. One security standard. Powered by @Chainlink CCIP. 🔁 Like, Retweet: https://x.com/xswap_link/status/2083966401602027760?s=20 Twitter | Website | Community Telegram

🔥3

29 Jul 2026, 18:36 UTC478 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Secure rails should lead to simple movement. Built on @chainlink CCIP, XLine connects routes across the network through one infrastructure layer. One path from source to destination. 🔁 Like, Retweet: https://x.com/xswap_link/status/2082535651845571057?s=20 Twitter | Website | Community Telegram

2🔥2

23 Jul 2026, 19:25 UTC615 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Cross-chain DeFi is no longer optional. Users move assets across networks to access liquidity, yield, stablecoins, and new ecosystems. Builders want their products to reach users beyond one chain. Chains want liquidity to move in, not remain locked somewhere else. But once value moves between chains, the infrastructure underneath becomes the most important part of the experience. 🔁 Read the full article, Like, Ret

🔥3

21 Jul 2026, 16:38 UTC583 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Same dollar. Same value. USDC should not lose that promise across chains, but that is still not the default. That’s why XSwap is building infrastructure for cross-chain stablecoin movement. A model where value stays intact, from source to destination. 🔁 Like, Retweet: https://x.com/xswap_link/status/2079606845690277954?s=20 Twitter | Website | Community Telegram

🔥5

16 Jul 2026, 16:03 UTC655 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Every chain. Connected. 🔁 Like, Retweet: https://x.com/xswap_link/status/2077786020892844386?s=20 Twitter | Website | Community Telegram

🔥4

14 Jul 2026, 17:51 UTC591 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Cross-chain DeFi does not need more isolated bridges. It needs infrastructure that can make separate ecosystems work together without adding more decisions for users. Built on @chainlink CCIP, XSwap is building toward a model where chains do not need to be connected one by one for users and protocols to move across them. The goal is simple: make DeFi feel connected by default. 🔁 Like, Retweet: https://x.com/xswap

🔥43

10 Jul 2026, 09:43 UTC555 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

New look. Same mission. → xswap.link 🔁 Like, Retweet: https://x.com/xswap_link/status/2075312758392857041 Twitter | Website | Community Telegram

🔥4

8 Jul 2026, 12:29 UTC529 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

For users, the important part is continuity. Legacy bridged USDC can move into a version with a defined path toward native USDC. XLine executes the CCIP routing behind it. 🔁 Like, Retweet: https://x.com/xswap_link/status/2074827466439311518 Twitter | Website | Community Telegram

7 Jul 2026, 18:18 UTC419 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Stablecoin infrastructure matters most when it leads to usage. USDC moves into @AstarNetwork through connected infrastructure, then goes straight into DeFi activity. Made possible by XLine. 🔁 Like, Retweet: https://x.com/xswap_link/status/2074540626838765611 Twitter | Website | Community Telegram

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @xswap_link. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ZNS Connect Name Service
@znsconnect · 45,486
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“XSwap Announcements” (@xswap_link), 4,764 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xswap_link.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.