Video, posted without a caption

Channel
...
@xthewayiseeitx
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
17subscribers
-8,174 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001300611905 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xthewayiseeitx |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xthewayiseeitx |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 03:19 | 17 | -9,401 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 00:00 | 9,418 | +64 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 03:18 | 9,354 | +53 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 18:19 | 9,301 | -160 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 17:12 | 9,461 | -189 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:26 | 9,650 | +431 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:34 | 9,219 | +145 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:33 | 9,074 | +138 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:59 | 8,936 | +329 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:26 | 8,607 | +477 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:56 | 8,130 | -52 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:26 | 8,182 | +22 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:21 | 8,160 | -31 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:18 | 8,191 | first reading |
Engagement
255 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1927.6%
- avg views ÷ 17 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 328
- 51 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 3.78%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 51
- of 255 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 48 of 51 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 255 (5 August 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 16,712 |
| Reactions total | 601 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 07:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 53m 08s
- Average length
- 29s
Measured directly from 109 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,305 reactions across 226 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 667 | 28.9% | |
| 😭 | 577 | 25.0% | |
| 💘 | 297 | 12.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 247 | 10.7% | |
| 🤣 | 215 | 9.33% | |
| 🍓 | 67 | 2.91% | |
| 🌚 | 45 | 1.95% | |
| 🔥 | 41 | 1.78% | |
| 🥰 | 39 | 1.69% | |
| 💔 | 32 | 1.39% | |
| 🤗 | 20 | 0.868% | |
| 💅 | 19 | 0.824% | |
| 🤝 | 12 | 0.521% | |
| 💋 | 10 | 0.434% | |
| 😇 | 10 | 0.434% | |
| 🦄 | 4 | 0.174% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 0.043% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.043% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 0.043% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 238 of the 255 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,377 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 255 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
ⓘ thv aegi collection ⭐️🧸💘
❤4
لازم نیست خودتو چیزی که نیستی نشون بدی؛خودت باش. برام مهم نیست چقدر پول در میاری، با چه دخترایی میگردی یا تو چه دعواهایی بودی. همهمون با دخترا سر و کار داشتیم. همهمون تو موقعیتهایی قرار گرفتیم که مجبور شدیم محکم باشیم. ولی شما زیادی نقش بازی میکنید؛ اینهمه پز دادن و خودنمایی لازم نیست. آدم واقعی میدونه سکوت طلاست و بهتره بیسروصدا کارتو جلو ببری. پولتو دربیار، خونسرد باش؛ لازم نیست دائم چیزی برای ثابت کردن داشته…
❤3
whose omega is this 😭
😭9❤🔥1💘1
وقتی پای تهیونگ وسطه یه مدل خاصی ذوق میکنه که خیلی قشنگه 😭
💘12
آر Sugar رو خط زده که بشه Suga 😭💘
❤10😭3💋1
Video, posted without a caption
💘6❤🔥2
my moon, the moon and my man 💙
❤14🌚1
جین و جونگکوک داشتن با یه آرمی خوشبخت قلب درست میکردن که نامجون بهشون ملحق شد با جین قلب درست کرد 🥲❤🩹
❤15😭1
این دوتا میخواستن چیزی بگن؟ و نشد؟ برای همین به هم نگاه کردن خندیدن؟ 🥲
🤣9
jungkook, the OG rapper's girlfriend
😭10
آفرین ادعای مالکیت کن خرگوشک ما پشتتیم 🤛🤜
😭10🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 255 posts we hold for @xthewayiseeitx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@HollywoodiDream · 14,4436 postsکتابخونه؛
@bookxteria · 4,9464 postsMusic Lyrics 🎶
@musiclyricsir · 8,4434 posts°ʚ🎀ɞ°𝙚𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙣𝙖𝙡 𝙛𝙡𝙤𝙬𝙚𝙧°ʚ🎀ɞ
@eternalflowerr · 4,7362 postsآپدیت کیپاپ و بی ال سوج
@kp0psavage · 14,6602 posts՚𝙋𝙖𝙧𝙠𝙃𝙮𝙪𝙣𝙜𝙎𝙞𝙠ᥫ᭡
@parkhyungsik_fans · 3,1212 postsbarbara palvin sprouse 💗
@barbarapalvinDaily · 1,7141 postتهکوک فیکشن|𝑇𝑎𝑒𝑘𝑜𝑜𝑘
@Fiction1taekook1forever · 1,3061 post"𝐈𝐀𝐍 𝐒𝐎𝐌𝐄𝐑𝐇𝐀𝐋𝐃𝐄𝐑"
@iansomerhalder_iran · 2,0441 post𝐐𝐔𝐄𝐑𝐄𝐍𝐂𝐈𝐀🦢༊
@kiddo8283 · 4,3081 postkorean by prmiss
@koreanbyparmiss · 2,7721 post𝑁𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑑 | دنیای کتاب
@landofnovel · 3,4691 postLatin Celebrities
@LatinCelebrities · 2,2701 post🧚♀✨My world ✨🧚
@Meandfairyland · 5,3821 post𝗥𝘆𝗮𝗻 𝗚𝗼𝘀𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴
@RyanGosling_616 · 1,4961 postShakira
@Shakirafans · 3,0991 post𝘿𝙚 𝙋𝙧𝙤𝙛𝙪𝙣𝙙𝙞𝙨
@ShinyStuff · 791 post𝑫𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒎𝒔
@spaec · 4,0211 postقَـروقاطــے 👀
@special_chums · 2,3371 post𝙏𝘼𝙆𝙃𝘼𝙔𝙊𝙇𝘼𝙏𝘼𝙈
@takhayolatm · 4,0281 post𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐎𝐑𝐈𝐆𝐈𝐍𝐀𝐋 𝐅𝐀𝐌𝐈𝐋𝐘
@The_OriginalFamily · 1,5811 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@avrilnation · 1,5992 posts◟˖࣪ 𝐀𝐫𝐨𝐧𝐚 ˖࣪◝
@BFFNotes · 3,1582 posts☾вℓαcк ρℓαүεя❥
@Black_player1 · 2,5232 postsکتابخونه؛
@bookxteria · 4,9462 postsدفترچه نیمهشب🕯️
@Daftarche_Nimehshab · 1,0852 posts°ʚ🎀ɞ°𝙚𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙣𝙖𝙡 𝙛𝙡𝙤𝙬𝙚𝙧°ʚ🎀ɞ
@eternalflowerr · 4,7362 postsFrenweh 🔥♥️
@FernwehDiary · 12 postsتهکوک فیکشن|𝑇𝑎𝑒𝑘𝑜𝑜𝑘
@Fiction1taekook1forever · 1,3062 posts𝐅𝐨𝐨𝐭𝐛𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐂𝐨𝐮𝐩𝐥𝐞𝐬
@footballcouple_ir · 7,3122 posts ִֶָ ⋆ ࣪ 𝑮𝒐𝒍𝒚𝒂𝒓 🤍🖇️
@Golyar_text · 4132 posts﴾ 𝐇𝖺𝐥𝖿 𝐁𝐥𝗈𝗈𝖽 𝐏𝗋𝗂𝗇𝖼𝖾 ﴿
@half_blo0d_Prince · 1,7172 postsHollywoodiDream | هالیوودی دریم
@HollywoodiDream · 14,4432 posts"𝐈𝐀𝐍 𝐒𝐎𝐌𝐄𝐑𝐇𝐀𝐋𝐃𝐄𝐑"
@iansomerhalder_iran · 2,0442 posts.کتابهایی که میخوانیم.
@Ketabaii_Ke_Mikhunam · 1,3292 posts𝐐𝐔𝐄𝐑𝐄𝐍𝐂𝐈𝐀🦢༊
@kiddo8283 · 4,3082 postsKosinews
@Kosinewss · 2,0362 posts🍸
@monacoladies · 4,3202 postsMy Universe ✨
@My_Universez · 1,7442 posts՚𝙋𝙖𝙧𝙠𝙃𝙮𝙪𝙣𝙜𝙎𝙞𝙠ᥫ᭡
@parkhyungsik_fans · 3,1212 postsSakura Learning Lounge🌸🍃
@SakuraLearningLounge · 2,1542 postsسِرتِرالین | Sertralin
@Sertralln · 8,3752 posts⋆ ִ ۫ 𝒔𝒆𝒕𝒔𝒊 𝒘𝒂𝒍𝒍𝒑𝒂𝒑𝒆𝒓 ⋆ ִ ۫ ˑ
@setsiiiwallpaper · 9912 posts𝙏𝘼𝙆𝙃𝘼𝙔𝙊𝙇𝘼𝙏𝘼𝙈
@takhayolatm · 4,0282 posts🎨 Artulos
@ZalNariman · 1,2972 posts
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Dizney_Moviez · 44,793
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 8 September 2026
@HollywoodCloud · 34,689
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“...” (@xthewayiseeitx), 17 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xthewayiseeitx.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.