#网友投稿:我来说明一下吧。宝威跟天行,高层想要收割,代理已经跑路很多人了。 将心比心,如果公司很好的话,有人会走吗?给公司创造利益,你代理会员输线钱多了,公司就回收。已经不只是第一次这样了,已经是属于忍无可忍。我只是个底层,想跟公司同进退,没想到是这样的鸟公司。入职千万不要去天行跟宝威,兄弟们,不要到时候收割到自己身上。 也跟还在天行跟宝威的兄弟警告一下:今天的我们,就是明天的你们。我本人就是做宝威代理线,被公司收回去的,提成一分钱没看见。今天又看见,离职的兄弟 E 换被冻结了。早就听闻公司的 E 换号,高层可以看见你转账了多少钱出去。 看来公司出的这个易换,也是能操控的。天行跟宝威是活不起了吗?就这样的公司,集团不管管吗?麻烦有在频道的警察,测查一下凯旋 2 楼,直接给这群 B 养的给扫了。草你妈的。 天行的公关也没必要出来解释。你们宝威跟天行做的那些 B 事,哪个体育平台不知道?试问,你部门 1000 万负盈利,公…

Channel
东南亚大事件🔥
@xw58888
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
14,201subscribers
-1,666 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003892813192 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xw58888 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 21 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xw58888 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 17:37 | 14,201 | -97 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 17:39 | 14,298 | -94 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 02:37 | 14,392 | -116 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 09:21 | 14,508 | -165 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 06:01 | 14,673 | -134 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 21:18 | 14,807 | -71 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 07:19 | 14,878 | -60 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 18:46 | 14,938 | -46 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 14:18 | 14,984 | -42 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:36 | 15,026 | -29 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:05 | 15,055 | -32 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:15 | 15,087 | -94 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:48 | 15,181 | -33 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:34 | 15,214 | -10 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 08:29 | 15,224 | -20 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 07:44 | 15,244 | -19 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:15 | 15,263 | -53 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:33 | 15,316 | -78 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 09:23 | 15,394 | -19 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 07:22 | 15,413 | first reading |
Engagement
33 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.29%
- avg views ÷ 14,201 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 184
- 8 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 8
- of 33 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 33 (21 July 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,468 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 11:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 16m 26s
- Average length
- 1m 22s
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
#群友反馈:海之港国际酒店一楼都是宪兵,抓了几十号人,有打野,签证逾期,没护照那些,现在一楼都是宪兵,不给进出。 关注导航频道➡ @dh555 投稿 @YT858
金边交警勒索2名外国游客500$罚款引发关注 昨天,两名外籍游客骑租来的摩托车从贡布前往金边,在用餐后因未佩戴头盔骑行被当地交警拦截。交警竟当场索要高达500美元的罚款,由于两人资金不足,最终经交涉支付了138美元。 两名外籍游客表示,交警索要的金额远超法定标准,公开呼吁有关部门介入查处并为其主持公道。 对此,金边市警察局长尊那林表示,目前警方已经介入调查中。 是外国游客,不是中国游客 照样搞钱,因为现在来钱路子少了~~ 关注导航频道➡ @dh555 投稿 @YT858
#网友反馈:西港警察局以及旁边移民局集结大批警力。 移民局四辆红色车牌汽车:凯雷德、丰田海拉克斯皮卡、现代MPV,以及商务接待领导人那种大商务车。警察局门口对面大约6-8辆警车,全部都是丰田海拉克斯皮卡;树林里面有四五个中巴,一些警察在待命。 附近吃饭的小商贩也有许多警察在吃饭。今天不知道突击哪一家,各位今天请保持警戒状态,如有不对,请及时抽身。只是一个提醒,避免紧急情况来了没有准备。各位网友切勿传播紧张情绪。 关注导航频道➡ @dh555 投稿 @YT858
#非洲资讯:卢萨卡警方捣毁一电诈窝点 抓获79名涉诈嫌疑人(含11名中国籍) 据赞比亚媒体报道:8月23日,赞比亚警方联合缉毒委员会、移民局、国家网络安全局开展突击执法行动,对首都卢萨卡新卡萨马区埃瓦纳庄园一处可疑场所实施搜查,共抓获79名涉嫌网络犯罪人员,行动线索来自当地民众举报。 官方通报显示,落网人员来自多个国家,分别为35名乌干达公民、11名中国公民、10名赞比亚公民、8名肯尼亚公民、6名加纳公民、5名利比里亚公民、2名布隆迪公民、1名乍得公民以及1名津巴布韦公民。 执法现场查获大批作案设备,含73台台式电脑、6台笔记本电脑、140部手机、5套星链设备、2块移动硬盘、10张新SIM卡以及75本护照;现场还缴获21490克瓦查、10450美元及其他外币现金。 经安全部门对扣押物证初步研判,该庄园内的场所为一处新近成立、组织严密的网络犯罪窝点。 办案人员同步核查外籍嫌疑人招募、食宿用工情况。初步线索显示,部分人员疑…
#群友爆料:越南岘港皇冠赌场三楼明宇贵宾厅负责人陈前亮、冯书晴夫妻卷款跑路。 越南岘港皇冠赌场三楼明宇贵宾厅主负责人陈前亮,伙同其配偶冯书晴,利用赌场贵宾厅运营便利,恶意侵占本人资金,卷走本人共计2000万USDT(泰达币)后失联跑路。二人现已潜逃境外,下落不明。 二人长期以赌场贵宾厅资金周转、筹码兑换、代存资金为名义,取得本人信任。在完成资金接收后,蓄意转移全部资产,销毁联络方式,彻底失联,属于蓄意侵占他人财产的恶意诈骗行为。 该笔资金为本人合法个人资产,被二人非法侵占后,本人已蒙受巨大经济损失,家庭与个人生活遭受严重冲击。现全网通告二人身份信息,提醒所有在越南经商、务工、旅居的华人同胞警惕该二人,切勿与其产生任何资金往来,避免再次遭受财产损失。 同时,本人已整理全部转账记录、聊天凭证、往来单据,正式向国内公安经侦部门、越南当地警方报案,启动跨境追赃维权程序,必将追究二人全部法律责任,追查资金流向,绝不姑息。 也奉劝…
#网友投稿:金三角特外东鹏村附近这边全是警察,行里已经拉走好几车了,附近的注意 PS:怎么还有头铁的在开工🤣 关注导航频道➡ @dh555 投稿 @YT858
#突发事件:今晚🇱🇦老挝金三角“特外”一号关口附近有一家打野酒店被端,老挝警察直接冲进场地里,一堆皮卡车堵在门口,外围直接封锁了,插翅难飞了! 目前反馈的消息,只抓中国人! 关注导航频道➡ @dh555 投稿 @YT858
#国内资讯:甘肃警方侦破特大荐股诈骗案:82人从柬埔寨押解回国,涉案8600余万元 8月21日,央视披露甘肃“3·10”特大电信网络诈骗案详情。甘肃警方已对这条涉及引流、荐股、虚假投资、技术开发和跑分洗钱的诈骗链条展开全链条打击。 今年2月26日,甘肃嘉峪关于先生被拉入股票投资群。诈骗团伙利用“导师精准荐股”、水军晒盈利截图、冒用真实证券从业人员身份以及高度仿真的虚假投资平台取得其信任。3月3日至7日,于先生累计被骗492万元,并于3月10日报警。 警方调查发现,诈骗团伙分工明确。“打粉”人员在社交平台寻找目标,“炒群”人员一人操控数十个水军账号制造盈利假象,“聊手”负责一对一诱导,还有人员每天根据真实股市涨跌更新诈骗话术。于先生被列为重点目标,团伙原计划诱导其投资1000万元以上。 被骗的492万元随后通过6个层级、96个涉案账户转移,其中对公账户成为洗钱的重要工具。 在公安部统一部署下,甘肃警方联动全国23个省、6…
🇻🇳 5名中国假和尚在越南胡志明被抓 越南胡志明市滨城坊警方近日根据网传线索,在平富坊一酒店内查获5名涉嫌假冒佛教僧侣向游客强卖物品敛财的中国籍人员。 执法人员在现场缴获了僧袍、佛珠、手串及佛牌等物品。经查,5人毒品快检均为阴性。胡志明警方指出,此类行为严重影响城市旅游形象,目前正会同相关部门深入调查。 关注导航频道➡ @dh555 投稿 @YT858
#印尼资讯:7名中国公民走私黄金印尼机场被查,涉案黄金23.7公斤,价值352万美元。将黄金塞入私处和皮燕子! 近日,印尼雅加达苏加诺‑哈达国际机场海关破获两起涉嫌走私案件,查获23.7公斤24K黄金,涉案价值630亿印尼盾(折合352万美元),一共抓获7名中国公民、2名印尼公民,其中一名印尼公民为机场地勤工作人员。 印尼财政部长普尔巴亚·尤迪·萨德瓦在8月13日的新闻发布会上通报此案,他对海关联合机场航空安保部门(Avsec)开展的联合行动予以肯定。相关部门在机场3号航站楼不到24小时内,接连破获两起相互独立的走私案件。 第一起案件的涉案对象为7名中国公民(5女2男),他们计划搭乘国泰航空CX798航班、印尼鹰航GA860航班飞往香港。 海关、机场航空安保以及警方工作人员在查验时,对该团伙的手提行李产生怀疑。经过进一步检查,现场查获41块圆柱形24K黄金,重17.43公斤,价值460亿印尼盾(约257万美元)。 调查…
带个话 请某位盘哥多少讲点江湖道义把你兄弟领回去吧 昨晚,你让他回原住所取行李,结果让房东老板扣了一夜,因为当时你们入住时,房东约法三章 不准搞电脑,结果你们依然搞 导致最终被宪兵端了窝。房东最后解禁房子花费一万刀 房东的意思,你们违约导致他被罚款,这个一万你们要赔偿 今天凌晨,房东松口降价,现在要3000$ 不算过分了 所以,凑凑吧把你们这个推子兄弟领走 不要真让柬埔寨人把他关了,到时候市场价就是3万刀了,反正这推子的家里人是一分不出,就看你盘哥是否出手了 关注导航频道➡ @dh555 投稿 @YT858
Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @xw58888. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚大事件🔥” (@xw58888), 14,201 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xw58888.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.