听风阁(口爆-快餐) 营业时间:19:30-4:30 价格: 95/240(调情,无套口爆) 98/340(调情,口,打炮) 中途🉑换人 🉑加钟 🉑提一切要求。尽量满足一切🎉 频道: @yunlong93 私聊: @yunlong91 双向: @yunlong_92bot 群聊: @yunlong0 本店每天平均在线13+ 演员名单:叶子。娜娜。甜甜。娇娇。依依。小雅。土豆。蓉蓉。小云。金子。满满。嘟嘟 欢迎咨询。

Channel
潇湘阁-全域资源榜
@xxgbd168
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
12,364subscribers
-5,132 since we began measuring on 17 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002573341361 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xxgbd168 |
| Description | 榜单老师均已验证 老板们可放心出击 联系唯一群主 @XXG668 潇湘阁全国交流群 https://t.me/xiaoxiangge58 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 17 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 52 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xxgbd168 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 18:30 | 12,364 | -28 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 20:24 | 12,392 | -5 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 20:11 | 12,397 | +2 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 18:29 | 12,395 | -4 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 19:17 | 12,399 | -9 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 22:39 | 12,408 | -52 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 21:35 | 12,460 | -87 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 01:06 | 12,547 | -247 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 00:46 | 12,794 | -19 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 03:40 | 12,813 | -40 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 22:59 | 12,853 | -117 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 01:10 | 12,970 | -124 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 02:50 | 13,094 | -124 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 04:08 | 13,218 | -140 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 04:49 | 13,358 | -141 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 04:56 | 13,499 | -119 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 02:06 | 13,618 | -143 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 17:16 | 13,761 | -111 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 15:01 | 13,872 | -130 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 14:46 | 14,002 | first reading |
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 12 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 44 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.58%
- avg views ÷ 12,364 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 442
- 6 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 6
- of 23 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 23 (12 August 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 2,653 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 07:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 522
- Videos
- 68
- Links
- 126
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 34s
- Average length
- 9s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 6 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
老师位置: #温州 山东路附近 服务价格:600p 1000pp 联系方式: @Coco4142 老师频道: https://t.me/cocoshous 老师参数:160CM 95 群主已验证 不是中介 诚信约课
老师位置: #常州 #常州武进 服务价格:500 联系方式: @asd660_123 老师频道: https://t.me/tgw2026 老师参数:160CM 44KG 群主已验证 不是中介 诚信约课
老师位置: #上海 服务价格:800P 1500PP 联系方式: @ying061000 老师频道: https://t.me/youyizi888 老师参数:私信老师 群主已验证 不是中介 诚信约课
端州94 高质量技师 端州天庭会所 预约私聊: @Languogui 双向联系: https://t.me/duanzhouyiqing94?direct 频道:https://t.me/+XWSDKYk39jgxNjcx
0️⃣编号:#15 1️⃣名称:澜佳湾SPA会所 2️⃣门店位置: 1. 北辰 北仓47中后门 3️⃣价格和服务: 95项目尽量➕微信或者电话☎️ 5张 60分钟全L口爆 内容:犹豫本店好多狼友争论太多,更新价位项目,花式 每天在岗人数4~6位。主打年轻,南方技师为主。服务可以放心[爱你]。主做服务,回头客,情绪价值必须到位。 服务:60分钟助浴,ABA面,全程制服调情,互动,口爆,过水,漫游,毒龙🐉,👅漫,🐻推,臀推,冰火二冲天,360无死角爱,欢迎大哥监督, 4️⃣营业时间:12:00-2:00 5️⃣联系方式: tg: @lzh6869 微信:jiayu555000 电话:17622358635 6️⃣其他: 无 7️⃣报告编号:
店家位置:#苏州 #苏州女仆 服务价格:599-1299 店家客服: @youmao123 店家频道:@suzhouyoumao92 服务项目:92 私影 群主已认证 资源真实可靠
店家位置: #湖州 #湖州会所 服务价格: 预约价450 店家客服:@am0572888 店家频道:https://t.me/+y1EH_6quw_ljMmE1 服务项目:92-94 群主已认证 资源真实可靠
老师位置: #厦门个人 #厦门老师 服务价格:P500/pp700/包时两个小时1200.夜1800(莞式服务) 联系方式: @yaoyao555111 老师频道: https://t.me/yaoyao555777 老师参数:165CM 🐻C 群主已验证 不是中介 诚信约课
老师位置: #东莞 #东莞抓龙筋 服务价格:398-698 联系方式: @lixin2511 老师频道: https://t.me/xinxincloudy 服务项目:抓龙筋 群主已验证 不是中介 诚信约课
老师位置: #惠州 #惠州个人 服务价格:600P 1200PP 联系方式: @XingXing6850 老师频道: https://t.me/fgifkkmmmk 老师参数:160CM 🐻C 群主已验证 不是中介 诚信约课
老师位置: #惠州 #惠州个人 服务价格:700P 1400PP 联系方式: @LeBao8860 老师频道: https://t.me/LeBaobayp 老师参数:168CM 🐻B 群主已验证 不是中介 诚信约课
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @xxgbd168. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@yunlong93 · 5,1632 posts娇娇
@asdfgwertyi · 1,3101 postCoCo课堂
@cocoshous · 851 post端州天庭94
@duanzhouyiqing94 · 9771 post椰子🌴的小🏠💕
@fgifkkmmmk · 3721 post乐宝💕频道
@LeBaobayp · 7251 post柔柔的朋友圈
@shsue281 · 3171 post苏州YouMao私影陪玩恋爱体验🌸
@suzhouyoumao92 · 6,6671 post叶子的森林
@tgw2026 · 521 post图图的家🏠
@tutu555577 · 1,1711 post杭州拱墅初初
@wrtx999 · 4671 post南城高端私享抓龙筋💋
@xinxincloudy · 1,2191 post西西的小屋
@xixidexiaowu26 · 2651 post瑶瑶的后宫
@yaoyao555777 · 2071 post西安听风阁(95-98)口爆 快餐,分享群
@yunlong0 · 5,5461 post中发白的空间
@zhongfabai8 · 1,0511 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@xxgbd168 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 3 posts, 19 August 2026 – 21 August 2026 · confirmed gone 26 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“潇湘阁-全域资源榜” (@xxgbd168), 12,364 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xxgbd168.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.