Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 灰狼相伴,四海同心

Channel

灰狼相伴,四海同心

@xxhh888

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

383subscribers

-49 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002444009633
TypeChannel
Username@xxhh888
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/xxhh888

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

383436409.57 August 2026 — 432 subscribers8 August 2026 — 432 subscribers8 August 2026 — 436 subscribers16 August 2026 — 426 subscribers24 August 2026 — 418 subscribers31 August 2026 — 410 subscribers10 September 2026 — 392 subscribers18 September 2026 — 383 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 42 days, net -49. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 375–444 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 14:40383-9
10 Sept 2026, 01:40392-18
31 Aug 2026, 09:28410-8
24 Aug 2026, 14:33418-8
16 Aug 2026, 17:55426-10
8 Aug 2026, 06:32436+4
8 Aug 2026, 05:18432no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:29432first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 2 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

59 reactions across 6 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🎉1220.3%
👍915.3%
💯813.6%
👏610.2%
🕊58.47%
🔥46.78%
35.08%
35.08%
😎35.08%
🌚23.39%
💩11.69%
😁11.69%
🤔11.69%
🥰11.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 April 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 03:19 UTC41 viewsread 8 August 2026

api群发 官方通道 巴西效果w150-300 当天发送 按钮超链 全球可发

5 Aug 2026, 08:42 UTC137 viewsread 8 August 2026

巴西🇧🇷BC图文超链 落地高 免排队 还有位置 效果嘎嘎好 巴西BC🇧🇷WS拉群 包拉包炸 效果万120+

14 Jul 2026, 10:12 UTC133 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📣效果不会骗人,巴西🇧🇷图文超链还有位置

1👍1💩1

29 Jun 2026, 10:22 UTC138 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

巴西🇧🇷Bc图文超链量 昨晚测试单 效果反馈不错 充值高 可出量5-10雷台子 欢迎老板测试🔏

27 Jun 2026, 09:26 UTC215 viewsread 8 August 2026

WhatsAPP普群,200-300人稳定在拉,优先哥伦比亚,墨西哥,价格冰点,来单就秒,不封群不封群!

22 Jun 2026, 01:42 UTC127 viewsread 8 August 2026

多年后你的儿子开着宾利上大学, 暑假练开飞机, 小三偷偷怀孕闹着你要跟你结婚, 40多度的夏天, 你的别墅宽敞而凉爽, 每餐都要小酌一杯50年以前的飞天茅台 , 经常约新的嫩模累到一个人半夜躲在阳台抽烟。 而造成这一切的原因, 仅仅是因为你 找灰狼拉了点群 发了点群发,从而登临人生巅峰。

21 Jun 2026, 07:31 UTC200 viewsread 8 August 2026

WS300人不封群,群依旧稳定,支持测试,依旧保开

18 Jun 2026, 21:52 UTC208 viewsread 8 August 2026

TG群发私信,通道送达稳定,落地%100 图片+文字+按钮(按钮可改名字,数量不限) 用户名/手机号,全球可发,精准打击覆盖! 文案内容无限制,可附带采集群用户名

18 Jun 2026, 15:49 UTC193 viewsread 8 August 2026

好消息 好消息 WS封控放松一丢丢 能接受封群得来 保前2条消息

8 Jun 2026, 23:42 UTC221 viewsread 8 August 2026

TG直拉 印度100人 阿根廷100人 孟加拉100人 厄瓜多尔100人 HK 100人 玻利维亚100人 洪都拉斯100人 墨西哥50-100人 伊拉克50人 更多国家欢迎咨询,全程可配合测试调整

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @xxhh888. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“灰狼相伴,四海同心” (@xxhh888), 383 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xxhh888.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.