Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for xʏᴛʀᴏɴ

Channel

xʏᴛʀᴏɴ

@xytron18

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,548subscribers

-44 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001484999120
TypeChannel
Username@xytron18
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/xytron18

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,5481,5981,5737 August 2026 — 1,592 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,592 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,594 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,598 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,594 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,590 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,593 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,588 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,587 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,583 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,580 subscribers6 September 2026 — 1,571 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,564 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,557 subscribers19 September 2026 — 1,548 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 43 days, net -44. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,541–1,606 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 15:591,548-9
14 Sept 2026, 21:411,557-7
11 Sept 2026, 15:591,564-7
6 Sept 2026, 18:371,571-9
2 Sept 2026, 04:171,580-3
30 Aug 2026, 08:441,583-4
27 Aug 2026, 07:441,587-1
24 Aug 2026, 09:451,588-5
21 Aug 2026, 03:251,593+3
18 Aug 2026, 00:531,590-4
14 Aug 2026, 14:281,594-4
11 Aug 2026, 00:321,598+4
7 Aug 2026, 20:121,594+2
7 Aug 2026, 10:021,592no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:571,592first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 21 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 47s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

144 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9465.3%
💔2517.4%
🥰128.33%
😢42.78%
💯32.08%
❤‍🔥21.39%
🎉21.39%
🖕10.694%
🤔10.694%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 144 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 21 May 2025 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Dec 2025, 18:53 UTC≈4,360 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Bhai idk why I haven't said this before ig but I think 2026 gonna be bigger than 2016 for Kohli the last and the greatest peak incoming idk why m saying this 🥶 XD

17🎉1

23 Jun 2025, 17:14 UTC≈7,300 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Test cricket will be played again tomorrow, But the heart of test cricket will never be playing it again, Good night 🤗💔

💔256🖕1

31 May 2025, 19:30 UTC≈3,760 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Which of the following is the most scariest!

  1. Being caught watching porn by parents29%
  2. RCB loosing 2025 IPL final14%
  3. Virat Kohli taking retirement from all forms of cricket (IPL+ODIs as well)46%
  4. Being caught browsing phone at late night when everyone is asleep.4%
  5. Lafda with @krampus_editz7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1🎉1

31 May 2025, 19:11 UTC≈2,550 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

RCB: Started off humongously well in the first few matches but fumbled in their first home game at Chinnaswamy—mainly due to their batting intent! The same pattern continued in their 2nd and 3rd losses as well. The 4th loss can be attributed to our bowlers, inexperienced captaincy, and a batting collapse despite a ballistic start. Strengths: 1. Underdogs chipping in at the right time 2. Ability to accelerate from

3

31 May 2025, 14:11 UTC≈2,770 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

As we all know, the IPL Final is set for Tuesday, 3rd June. As a devoted RCB fan, I urge everyone to observe a fast and recite the Hanuman Chalisa once before the match begins. For one last time this season, let’s unite in spirit and give it everything we can from our end—through prayers, positivity, and unwavering belief. Let’s manifest victory for our team together! . I beg all my followers to follow up on this as

16🥰1

31 May 2025, 10:39 UTC≈1,780 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

RCB team bus otw to the stadium! (Visuals from LSG v RCB match)

1🤔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @xytron18. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

31 May 2025, 19:30 UTCAnonymous Poll153 voters

Which of the following is the most scariest!

  1. Being caught watching porn by parents29%
  2. RCB loosing 2025 IPL final14%
  3. Virat Kohli taking retirement from all forms of cricket (IPL+ODIs as well)46%
  4. Being caught browsing phone at late night when everyone is asleep.4%
  5. Lafda with @krampus_editz7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 21 May 2025 to 17 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

DRIVEXPULL
@drivexpull · 60,895
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 22 August 2026
S TECHZ
@stechzyt · 85,190
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“xʏᴛʀᴏɴ” (@xytron18), 1,548 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xytron18.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.