Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for флэйс

Channel

флэйс

@yaflace

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

30,907subscribers

+13,679 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002003343446
TypeChannel
Username@yaflace
Descriptionсотрудничество/реклама: @timur_hbk почта: менеджеры: @dafer198 № 7004281576
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/yaflace

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

22,000 average views per post against 30,907 subscribers — an engagement rate of 71.1%. Across the 19,800 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,614 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 4.94% and 18.5%, with a median of 9.67%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (21 August 2026 20 September 2026)
Posts measured14 of 15 published in the window (0 exact, 14 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled307,500
Mature posts only71.1% over 14 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers30,907 measured 18 September 2026
Cohortb10000:rus · 19,800 channels · p10 2.55% · p25 4.94% · p50 9.67% · p75 18.5% · p90 31.1%
Position in cohort99.131th percentile · 7.3× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.035% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 20 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

16,58030,90723,743.57 August 2026 — 17,228 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,228 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,220 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,179 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,133 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,119 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,104 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,091 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,065 subscribers15 August 2026 — 17,047 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,986 subscribers18 August 2026 — 16,960 subscribers19 August 2026 — 16,951 subscribers20 August 2026 — 16,924 subscribers21 August 2026 — 16,905 subscribers22 August 2026 — 16,890 subscribers24 August 2026 — 16,861 subscribers25 August 2026 — 16,809 subscribers26 August 2026 — 16,793 subscribers27 August 2026 — 16,769 subscribers28 August 2026 — 16,755 subscribers29 August 2026 — 16,728 subscribers30 August 2026 — 16,734 subscribers31 August 2026 — 16,725 subscribers1 September 2026 — 16,711 subscribers2 September 2026 — 16,702 subscribers3 September 2026 — 16,683 subscribers5 September 2026 — 16,653 subscribers8 September 2026 — 16,580 subscribers11 September 2026 — 20,127 subscribers13 September 2026 — 25,662 subscribers14 September 2026 — 27,251 subscribers16 September 2026 — 29,408 subscribers18 September 2026 — 30,907 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 42 days, net +13,679. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,431–33,056 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 18:5530,907+1,499
16 Sept 2026, 11:4129,408+2,157
14 Sept 2026, 17:3627,251+1,589
13 Sept 2026, 05:3925,662+5,535
11 Sept 2026, 07:5820,127+3,547
8 Sept 2026, 09:5916,580-73
5 Sept 2026, 05:3616,653-30
3 Sept 2026, 13:4116,683-19
2 Sept 2026, 08:1716,702-9
1 Sept 2026, 09:2616,711-14
31 Aug 2026, 10:5316,725-9
30 Aug 2026, 11:5716,734+6
29 Aug 2026, 11:4816,728-27
28 Aug 2026, 09:3316,755-14
27 Aug 2026, 13:0416,769-24
26 Aug 2026, 11:5616,793-16
25 Aug 2026, 13:5616,809-52
24 Aug 2026, 13:0616,861-29
22 Aug 2026, 17:2316,890-15
21 Aug 2026, 11:2716,905first reading

Engagement

39 posts held, back to 22 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
71.7%
avg views ÷ 30,907 subscribers
Avg views / post
22,200
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.02%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 39 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 September 2026
Posts held39 (22 June 202618 September 2026)
Views total310,100
Reactions total15,572
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Sept 2026, 05:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
316
Videos
62
Links
102

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 38s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

34,680 reactions across 38 posts, in 47 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
23,18566.9%
❤‍🔥3,64610.5%
💘2,4467.05%
🔥1,3994.03%
🥰8162.35%
🐳8062.32%
💋5541.60%
👍5141.48%
🍓3791.09%
🦄1450.418%
💯1050.303%
🙏960.277%
💔880.254%
🎉640.185%
😍460.133%
🕊410.118%
🤨390.112%
👎290.084%
😁270.078%
🎅260.075%
27 further kinds2290.66%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34,680 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 18 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
160
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 38 we hold a reading for · 39%
Most on one post
81
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yaflace. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 39 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 June 2026 to 18 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

18 Sept 2026, 13:39 UTC≈10,600 views864 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

ребят у моего друга нео из матрицы (или саши белого из бригады) сегодня день рождение!!!! поздравьте подписочкой на телеграм канал: https://t.me/prkljj p.s это мой друг илюха прикольный кто не понял

682💘90🎉55❤‍🔥8🦄8🍓7🍾5👎3

17 Sept 2026, 13:37 UTC≈12,600 views1,062 reactions3 Starsread 20 September 2026
Video

ребят кто может упустил, но у меня там влог вышел🥱 https://youtu.be/2DOuCuQRHM4 поддержите лайком, комментарием(я все лайкаю!!) p.s мне очень нравится эта анимация к ТРЕКУ, но я оч его стесняюсь реально ахахаахах

845❤‍🔥118🍓66💘14👍7🐳5🌭4👾3

15 Sept 2026, 15:08 UTC≈16,200 views1,447 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

ВЫИГРАЛ В КУБАХ У ЭКСАЙЛА? https://youtu.be/2DOuCuQRHM4 а еще трек записал прикиньте😳 p.s дико извиняюсь за такую задержку, оч надеюсь на вашу поддержку!!!

1,090💋170❤‍🔥111💘29🔥11🐳10💯9🤡5

15 Sept 2026, 10:37 UTC≈17,200 views1,287 reactions6 Starsread 20 September 2026

сегодня влог! ждете?

🐳791❤‍🔥265🙏9672👎18💩12🤮9🤷‍♀8

9 Sept 2026, 15:45 UTC≈91,000 views3,568 reactions81 Starsread 20 September 2026
Photo

РОЗЫГРЫШ Айфона Из КУБОВ ЭКСАЙЛА Урааа, я выиграл айфон 17 про и конечно хочу подарить его вам (народный) Условия: 1) Подписка на мой тг канал Всё мега просто, без кучи подписок итд Он правда лежал у меня 5 месяцев, я очень хотел рассказать, но не мог(

2,430❤‍🔥532👍311💘59🍓48🔥43🕊36😍29

Signed Best Random Bot 🎁 [Конкурсный бот для розыгрышей | Рандомайзер]

9 Sept 2026, 11:13 UTC≈25,000 views1,087 reactions4 Starsread 20 September 2026
Photo

не вырезали с обложки йоооооу https://youtu.be/33G7m_gwpIw

860💘124🍓61❤‍🔥14🔥11👍7🌚3👎3

6 Sept 2026, 13:10 UTC≈20,800 views962 reactions1 Starread 20 September 2026

ребят, вижу что пишите про влог…. не можем его выложить так как вторая часть кубов задерживается( у нас то все давно готово

731❤‍🔥105💯66💘23🍓8😭7😱7💋5

1 Sept 2026, 07:09 UTC≈22,600 views1,375 reactions4 Starsread 20 September 2026
Photo

эксайл уволил пришлось в школу вернуться #даздраствует8класс

1,130🔥124💘91❤‍🔥8👾8👏6🍓3🤩3

28 Aug 2026, 17:47 UTC≈19,300 views606 reactions1 Starread 20 September 2026

бекстейдж с кубов в следующем влоге!!!

🔥445102❤‍🔥44💘10🦄3🍓2

28 Aug 2026, 17:47 UTC≈17,800 views677 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

йоу ребят кубы вышли https://youtu.be/CxB6kZGIZaM?si=I9HiPDbFOaJQU3o7 да меня нет на обложке, но я правда там есть…..

540🦄69🤨35💘13❤‍🔥8🔥82🍓2

25 Aug 2026, 11:09 UTC≈16,600 views447 reactionsread 20 September 2026

это правда…. во влоге все увидите

337💘50❤‍🔥39💋7🔥6🍓5🦄3

Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @yaflace. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Jul 2026, 17:13 UTCAnonymous Poll1,920 voters approx.

Какие влоги вам больше зайдут?

  1. Длинные, но реже38%
  2. Такие как щас, но часто77%

The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 18 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“флэйс” (@yaflace), 30,907 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yaflace.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.