Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net -164. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,855–26,070 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 13:40
25,880
-17
15 Sept 2026, 12:37
25,897
-17
13 Sept 2026, 19:01
25,914
-15
12 Sept 2026, 02:15
25,929
-36
9 Sept 2026, 14:37
25,965
-53
6 Sept 2026, 06:15
26,018
-8
3 Sept 2026, 20:57
26,026
-13
2 Sept 2026, 14:19
26,039
-6
1 Sept 2026, 11:16
26,045
+29
31 Aug 2026, 08:44
26,016
+66
30 Aug 2026, 09:15
25,950
+15
29 Aug 2026, 10:14
25,935
-4
28 Aug 2026, 09:04
25,939
-2
27 Aug 2026, 11:25
25,941
-2
26 Aug 2026, 09:58
25,943
-16
25 Aug 2026, 07:52
25,959
-5
24 Aug 2026, 04:38
25,964
-23
22 Aug 2026, 16:06
25,987
-19
21 Aug 2026, 03:16
26,006
-1
20 Aug 2026, 05:05
26,007
first reading
Engagement
93 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.7%
avg views ÷ 25,880 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,040
47 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.87%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
47
of 93 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held
93 (28 July 2026 – 22 September 2026)
Views total
142,656
Reactions total
12,651
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
23 Sept 2026, 05:52 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈8,710
Videos
≈12,100
Links
≈410
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3h 01m
Average length
4m 13s
Measured directly from 43 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
26,576 reactions across 93 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
13,966
52.6%
💯
4,155
15.6%
🫡
2,941
11.1%
😭
1,835
6.90%
💔
1,337
5.03%
🤬
888
3.34%
👏
734
2.76%
🔥
279
1.05%
👌
127
0.478%
🤣
121
0.455%
😍
74
0.278%
🙏
50
0.188%
🏆
35
0.132%
😱
20
0.075%
🤪
8
0.03%
💊
6
0.023%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 93 of the 93 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26,576 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 93 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
45
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 93 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
32
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yahyanawzarjaf. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 93 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 22 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🔻✔️🔻وانەی عەقیدە و ئیمان و تەوحید و جیهاد و صەبر و اخلاص و مەبدەئ و … تەنها لە ژن و منداڵ و پیاوی غەززە وەرگرن نەک لە دیکۆر و دکتۆری فەیک و کەوی ڕاو و ….
🚨سوپای زایۆنی خەیمەی بەڕێوەبەری گشتی تەندروستی کردووەتە ئامانج و کوڕەکەی شەهید بووە و خۆی ڕزگاری بووە کەلە خەیمەکەی خۆی چارەسەری وەرگرتووە بەهۆی خراپی باری تەندروستیەوە
💥دەڵێت خۆڕاگرین لەسەر زەوی خۆمان ، نائومێد نابین و منداڵ و خۆشەویستەکانمان پێشکەش دەکەین
💔156😭75🤬24🫡11❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 93 posts we hold for @yahyanawzarjaf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@yahyanawzarjaf edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
FIND JOB IN KURDISTAN(FJK)هەلی کار بدۆزەرەوە لە کوردستان @fjkurdistan10 · 112,912#68
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
«خۆشترین فیلمەکان» 🎬 @xoshtrenfilmkan · 37,016 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 17 here — alongside 16 others — read 13 September 2026
Shex shamann @shexshaman1 · 34,557 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 3 September 2026
kurdiu @kurdiu_org · 25,454 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 14 September 2026
پەرتووکی دەنگی @partukidangi · 25,724 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 13 September 2026
مامۆستایانی بە ئەزموون @mamostaya · 33,567 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 4 September 2026
Hawrê Sardar🔥 @Hawre_Sardar · 45,818 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 27 August 2026
💰نرخی دولار nrxi dolar💰 @nrxidolar · 67,900 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 20 August 2026
بازاڕی دۆلارەكە @bazari_dolaraka · 126,487 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“یحیی نەوزەر جاف” (@yahyanawzarjaf), 25,880 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yahyanawzarjaf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
